In “health education” there are content on kid sexualisation

Member of Karina Bosak in Polsat News in a conversation on “health education” which wants to introduce the Ministry of National Education under Barbara Nowacka.

First of all, I believe that this subject should not be mandatory. This is the first thing that should be changed if we are even considering any improvement in the curriculum and the introduction of a fresh subject.

The problem is that in this program of this subject are in addition to content that is good, correct, can be agreed with, there are besides specified content that gives emergence to controversy among many parents, are incompatible with their views, where they may fear that any content they disagree with will be required from their children. Here I mean the content of their sexualization.

For example, it is in the part that is primary, will be required not an optional part, for children who are 10-12 years old, class 4-6, it is written that the student characterizes concepts specified as “sexual health”, “sexuality” and discusses their affirmative dimension in human life. After all, at the age of 10, children wonder whether Santa Claus brings them presents, not about their sexuality. It can besides be said that this is the minute erstwhile girls begin to mature, but boys not yet, they begin to mature a small bit later and, as if at specified an unnatural moment, introducing specified subjects, raising specified curiosity not at this minute what is needed, can have very, actually tragic consequences for their later upbringing, character formation.
It's like I agree with my parents' outrage that it's besides early and that can't be mandatory.

Member @KarinaBosak In @PolsatNewsPL about the risks posed by wellness education

Parents have the eventual word and decision-making in teaching their children, especially in matters not only spiritual but besides moral!

There are studies that indicate that... pic.twitter.com/fSSm0GFb2x

Sexualization is that we contact content that concerns the sexuality of a individual in a very broad way, we do not value it properly, as parents would like. After all, each parent wants to present the kid in an appropriate way, given his appropriate sensitivity, it is only the parent who knows at what point the kid is ready to hear the appropriate content. I think that parents should be the first to help. possibly parents request any aid talking to children.

There's a part of this program that you can agree with that should stay there. But the part that concerns sexual education, which causes specified large controversy, should be discarded from this subject. Or this object should be optional. due to the fact that it besides creates another very large threat to families in general. Look, if there are many parents and there are already protests of parents who disagree on this basis in this respect, they will not want to let their children go to specified compulsory classes, these children will have an uncounted obligatory subject, and this will already be a violation of the school work and then this is simply a court case.
It's not like that. In Germany, it is precisely due to this radical, permissive sexual education that is taught in school, that parents decide on home education and are pursued by the state and sometimes even gotta flee to Poland for example. This is also, let's say, at this phase a far-reaching association, but it cannot be denied that it is simply a logical causality.

The question of human sexuality is not only about facts, but besides about morality, responsibility. specified issues that already fall into specified a unique parental power, which is defended and protected by the constitution, that parents have the eventual word and decision-making just in teaching their children, precisely in matters not only spiritual but besides moral. And it doesn't should be like comparing sex education with religion. After all, you can besides compose your kid out of religion, if parents, even if they are believers, for example, do not agree with the form of conducting these activities, then there is no problem. Therefore, I do not see any problem, why sexual education must, precisely these passages must be on this program and they must be compulsory. I think that's the biggest shame about this show.

There are studies that propose that if a kid learns besides rapidly about specified sexual issues or so makes various attempts at early sexual initiations, it affects his earlier onset of addiction, drugs, alcoholism, aggressive behavior, autoaggressive behavior, depression. This is simply a simple way to make these children's intellectual wellness even worse in this country. And as if this is the most controversial thing and, even though all the things you mention are affirmative and good, and let them stay there and let this subject be obligatory, then let all the issues that are controversial about sexual education be thrown out, due to the fact that that is just what parents do not accept.