Unwarranted objections to president Andrzej Duda

The first crisis on the line of the Presidential Palace and Novgorod was to happen almost immediately after the election, at least specified were unofficial versions presented in anonymous talks with the media. And although this version repeats itself rather often, the causes of the conflict are different. In 1 variant It was about Smolensk and the soft position of Andrzej Duda, while Jarosław Kaczyński full trusted the version of Antoni Macierewicz. The second option afraid Antoni Macerewicz himself and the war with the president about the authority over the armed forces, although this is precisely what the constitution defines.

There were besides various conspiracy theories and moral scandals, but the origin of the unofficial conflict is known only to the parties and, in addition, most likely each has its own explanation. It is certain that the first authoritative conflict between Andrzej Duda and the Laws on Judicial improvement is veto. This happened in the summertime of 2017 and almost led to a full crisis, but it was yet averted thanks to the visit of Jarosław Kaczyński to the Presidential Palace. Since then, the PiS electorate has been divided into supporters and opponents of Andrzej Duda and a painting of the "soft president" was created.

Then we had another conflicts, mainly with Zbigniew Ziobro, but besides Jack Kurski, there were another vetoes, including the loud veto of the demolition bill, which was to deprive military ranks of communist officers. Faced with the threat of the eventual defeat of Andrzej Duda in the 2020 presidential election, the PiS electorate reunited and thus Rafał Trzaskowski He lost the election. The next 3 years due to the "pandemic" and conflict in Ukraine did not bring major disputes and at most misunderstandings arose. Only the failure of power by the Law and Justice in 2023 caused the tension between Jarosław Kaczyński and Andrzej Duda to return to a advanced level.

The hard core of the PiS accused the president that he would not argue the appointment of Donald Tusk's government and would not respond to breaking the law. This was a alternatively pathetic and childish behavior, due to the fact that the president has no instruments he could usage to effectively block the appointment of a government or incarceration for the purposes of guilty violations of the law. Frustrated by the failure of power, PiS politicians simply shifted work for their own failures and part of the electorate went the same way. However, what happened after the law was signed and the mention to the Constitutional Court was even more surprising. The sharp division of PiS activists and militant voters indicates a complete deficiency of cognition or a tendency to riot.

First of all, it must be stressed that the budget bill is the only bill that the president cannot veto. Yes, the president may not have signed the bill and directed it to the TK, but in practice it would not have changed anything, due to the fact that in specified a case it is adequate to scope for a known solution, which is the budgetary make-up. However, not signing the budget bill would supply political fuel to the ruling coalition, especially Donald Tusk, a specialist in lies, manipulation and propaganda.

It would be adequate for Tusk to address the increases in the budget for the alleged budget, including the teachers, and we would have a large fuss. The solution adopted by the president is optimal and this time Regrets to Andrzej Duda They have no reasonable basis mainly for the fact that Rafal Trzaskowski would besides benefit from the budget disturbance, which is simply a very unreasonable gift to the top opponent at the threshold of the presidential campaign.

We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!