I solemnly invalidate Donald Tusk's right to disregard the results of the 15.10.2023 referendum!
In elections combined with referendum au 15.10.2023 r attendance was according to the latest data 74% the full eligible, of which the referendum (with the required 50% attendance constitution) took part 41% voters Over 90% voted for 4 x NO - which is equivalent to that at 90% Voters 4 x NO Gives us that 36.9% of the full eligible to vote.
Even if all those who voted in elections and did not participate in the referendum would vote for 4 x YES - It's inactive the number of voters who voted for 4xNIE would represent a majority of more than 50% of all those active in this vote!
How dare anyone not to admit will and voice 36.9% all eligible to vote as binding on the government on the opposition of the Nation to migration policy erstwhile it is o 14.3% higher than the 1 from the 1997 referendum on changing the constitution to the current one?
From what prison anti-Polish minority, who had the chance to vote in a referendum alternatively of his boycott, claim the right not to recognise the vote and will of the majority?
If in the Constitution's evidence - a referendum is valid with the participation of a minimum of 50% of the full eligible to vote and the referendum's consequence is binding at 50% + 1 of this amount, the absolute sum is 25% + 1 The rightful!
If that's consistent with the constitution, then where is the logic that voice and will 39.6% of the right to vote are not binding!
The paradox is that in 1997, with the constitutional request of the 50% referendum on the adoption of the current constitution, only the 42.86% entitled to vote of which only 52,7 % in favour of its adoption, which means number 22,59% all right to vote, and that would have been adequate to consider this referendum crucial and this constitution the highest law! Isn't that another highest of absurdity? Why does the current opposition not usage this fact, ignored by the coalition on 13 December - the voice of many millions of Poles - to effectively block migration madness?
How can 1 win in the referendum of Polish patriots speaking so crucial in 2023 4 x NO for EU (German) relocation policy to agree with the communicative that the result of the referendum as a consequence of apparent manipulation during elections is not binding for non-government D. Tusk?
