"Israel's war with Iran does not concern atomic weapons It is and always has been about government change and breaking Axis of Resistance"

grazynarebeca5.blogspot.com 2 weeks ago

Robert Inlakesh is simply a political analyst, writer and documentary filmmaker, presently surviving in London, United Kingdom.He reported events from Palestinian territories and lived in these territories, and presently works for Quds News.Director of the movie "Steal of the Century: Trump's Palestine-Israel Catastrophe".

@falasteen47

A photograph FROM ARCHIVE.© Mostafa Alkharouf / Anadolu via Getty Images

The claim adopted by the United States, Israel and their European partners that the attack on Iran was a "preventive" effort to halt Tehran from gaining atomic weapons is clearly false.It has about the same weight as the charges against Saddam Hussein of Iraq in 2003, and this aggressive war is equally illegal.

For most of the 4 decades Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed Iran was 1 step distant from gaining atomic weapons.However, any effort to conclude an agreement that would introduce greater monitoring and restrictions on Iran's atomic program was systematically dismantled by Israel and its powerful lobbying groups in the western capitals.In order to decently measure Israel's attack on Iran, we request to establish the facts.Israeli leaders claim to have conducted a preventive attack, but have not provided any evidence to support their claims that Iran was 1 step distant from gaining atomic weapons.The very message is not evidence, it is simply a claim akin to how the United States informed the planet of Saddam Hussein's possession of weapons of mass destruction.In March, U.S. National Intelligence manager Tulsi Gabbard testified before the legislature Intelligence Commission that the intelligence community “continues to justice that Iran is not building atomic weapons and the ultimate Leader ajatollah Ali Chamenei did not authorize the atomic weapons program he suspended in 2003.”Iran besides actively participated in indirect negotiations with the United States to accomplish a fresh version of the 2015 atomic Agreement. Donald Trump announced that Washington would unilaterally retreat from the agreement in 2018, alternatively continuing the run of sanctions "maximum pressure" at Israel's request.Despite Netanyahu and Trump's claims that Iran was violating the atomic agreement, the global Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published a study stating that Iran was full respecting the agreement at the time.If you trace all conversation with neoconservatives, Israeli war hawks and Washington think tanks, their opposition to the atomic agreement of the time Obama always ends with a spiral around Iran's ballistic rocket program and its support for regional non-state actors.Israeli officials frequently say that Iran will produce atomic weapons during “years”, “months”, or even “weeks”, has become almost a second nature.However, their main problem has always been the support of Iran for groups specified as Hamas and Hezbollah, which search to make a Palestinian state.

The proof is simple.Israel itself cannot destruct Iran's vast atomic program.It is unclear whether the U.S. can destruct it too, even if they enter the war.An example of U.S. inefficiencies in the penetration of Iranian-style bunkers, built in mountain ranges, as many Iranian atomic objects, is the failure of Americans to destruct rocket bases in Yemen with Bunker-buster ammunition, dropped off B-2 bombers.Almost immediately after the start of the war with Iran Netanyahu sent a message in English to the Iranian people, calling on him to overthrow the government to origin social unrest.The Israeli Prime Minister has since almost announced that his real intention is to change the regime, claiming that the operation "may lead to a change of regime".Israel's own intelligence community and military elite besides expressed their view that their air forces themselves are incapable to destruct the Iranian atomic program.So why start this war erstwhile the alleged reason why it was "preventively" started cannot be achieved?There are 2 possible explanations: The first is that the Israeli Prime Minister began this attack on Iran as a final clash in his "war on the 7 fronts", in which he hopes to end the regional conflict through a deadly exchange of views that will yet harm both parties.In this scenario, the desired consequence would be to end the war by saying that Netanjahu managed to destruct or importantly weaken the Iranian atomic program.He would besides add claims, as we already see, that he is making them, that immense amounts of Iranian missiles and drones have been eliminated.This would besides make Israel's first attack, in which elder commanders of the muslim Revolutionary defender Corps (IRGC) and atomic weapons scientists died, make sense.All of this would be an perfect blend of propaganda to sale a triumph narrative.On the another hand, the presumption would be that Tehran would besides declare victory.Then both sides can show the results to their people, and tensions are dropping for a while.If you read what the Washington think tank, especially The Heritage Foundation, says about the ability to halt the war.The second explanation, which may be an additional bonus, for which Israelis and the US number that it may arise as a consequence of their efforts, is that it is simply a full-size war to change the regime, whose aim is to pull the US in.Israel's military prestige was severely damaged in the Hamas attack on 7 October 2023 and no triumph over any enemy has been made since.Hamas continues to operate in the Gaza Strip and it is said to have as many fighters as Hezbollah received serious blows at the start of the war, but he is inactive very alive while Ansarallah in Yemen only increased his strength.It's a comprehensive, stunning defeat of the Israeli army and an embarrassment to the US.As we know, Iran is simply a regional power that supports everything called the opposition Axis.Without it, groups like Hezbollah and Hamas would be greatly demoted.It is clear that armed opposition against the Israeli business will never end until the occupied people be and live under oppressive governments, but the demolition of Iran would be devastating for a regional alliance against Israel.The most crucial question, however, is whether a change of government is possible at all.There is simply a serious question mark here and it seems far more likely that this will end in a slippery way leading to atomic war.What makes the Israeli-American claim that this war is someway preventive, to which there is no evidence is all the more absurd is that if anything, Iran can now actually rush to gain atomic weapons for defence purposes.If they can't even trust the Israelis that they won't bomb them with US support, while negotiations should take place, how can we even negociate a deal?Even if the U.S. joins and strikes a major hit on Iran's atomic program, this does not mean that Iran will simply quit on it.Instead, Tehran can just rebuild it and get the bomb years later.Another consequence of this war may be a change of government in Israel, which besides seems to be on the table now.