I remember gathering more than 4 decades ago. The then unbreakable militant with the communist strategy (about his Stalinist commitment we learned much later)Jacek Kuroń told students looking at him like a picture, for which he was late arrested.
OThat's why he said... smoking organization Committees. True, Kuron said that alternatively of burning them, we should put on our own, but according to the folk authority, it was dangerous to talk about smoking and committees.
Apparently, we have a return to these practices. During the Wednesday conference of the me(r)dial press secretary of the lawyer General Anna Violetta Adamiak (from Jakubaszek) filled with self-satisfaction over the Bodnar institution told about the disclosure A terrible writer in individual b. Minister of National Defence MP Marius Bliss.
The associate is to be punished for
...it acted to the detriment of the public interest and caused highly serious harm to the Republic of Poland, threatening its independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity, global position and cohesion of the North Atlantic Alliance, i.e. the act referred to in Article 231 §2 kk in conjunction with Article 265 §1 kk in conjunction with Article 11 (2) kk in conjunction with Article 12 (1) kk.
PLet us look at these rules.
Article 231(2) kk is the alleged qualifying form authoritative offence, as is popularly called this recipe.
According to the “Bodnarists”, Minister Błaszczak was illegally disclosing materials concerning Poland's defence plans, which were abandoned little than a decade earlier and had nothing to do with the current ones, to do so in order to accomplish individual benefit for the Law and Justice.
In turn, Article 265(1) kk expressly states:
§ 1. Who discloses or contrary to the provisions of the Act uses classified information about the 'secret' or 'close secret' clause,
is sentenced to imprisonment from 3 months to 5 years.
But let us read to the end on the website of the National Prosecutor's Office "the motion to waive the immunity of associate of the Polish Parliament Mariusz Błaszczyk".
Well, in a grueling (unreasonable) way, Mrs Bodnara gives arguments that we are dealing with another “smiled” pre-election hucpa compromise 13 December.
Well:
It is clear from the established facts that Mariusz Błaszczak, wishing to usage certain archived papers concerning strategical operational planning, which were given the "Secret Secret and Secret" clauses, for the election run to the Sejm and the legislature of Poland in October 2023, recommended that those papers be found in the Military Historical Office, and It subsequently took 2 decisions No 224/DOIN of 28 July 2023 and No 225/DOIN of 31 July 2023 abolishing the classification of the persons concerned.
The Carrot concept of “Bodnarists” is based on the alleged disadvantage of the above-mentioned decision, which causes them nullity by law. Minister Błaszczyk was to consult certain persons, including the Head of the HR Staff before issuing the decision.
Only that there is no specified thing in the Polish legal system. There is no nullity of an ex lege decision, but can only be considered based on Article 156 Code of Administrative Procedure. It so requires a separate administrative decision against which the appeal is based.
But this road is not accessible to the Hunwabs of the Ukrainian baldhead.
According to paragraph 2 of that provision:
The decision is not annulled for the reasons set out in paragraph 1, if 10 years have elapsed since the date of service or notice, and erstwhile the decision has produced irreversible legal effects.
There is no uncertainty that decisions No 224/DOIN of 28 July 2023 and No 225/DOIN COMMISSION DECISION of 31 July 2023 abolishing the classification of the revealed plans of the large reiterade prior to Russian aggression caused specified effects.
A We are so faced with a curiosity situation – decisions to declassified published materials be in the legal circulation and there is no way to get free of them, at the same time the “Bodnarists” effort to make Mariusz Błaszczyk a criminal case about which it is to be heard before the elections.
The question arises, isn't it a retortion for a study by the president of the Constitutional Tribunal?
I remind you that ongiś b. president Aleksander Kwasniewski characterizing Tuska said that there is ore and vengeful,
In a average country, a law-abiding country, no prosecutor would have been found that leaning that far. due to the fact that that would mean civilian death to him as a lawyer.
But he's here. Poland, in rule POIska.
Besides, you Anna Violetta Adamiak (from Jakubaszek) is already his age (born 1961), and thus in early 2026 he will go to rest* and will observe the “case” of Błaszczak with pleasance for the next decade.
We remember that prof. Romuald Sheremiet It took more than 12 years to clear the equally absurd charges.
Same Tuska-Bodnar script I want him with Bliss.
Plebs (This is how they specify their constituents!!!) He's expected to be fed a small bit more time.
With populist over any measurement of pre-election promises of parties and couches forming compromise 13 December Nothing left.
POin 1 — POI'm utilizing the PiS.
But it doesn't even work. tusk camandie.
It's just Tusk, Leschina and... just a pile of stones..
6.22 2025
_________________________
* Oh, my God * What's more, at any time for 9 years, he can quit by making a request!
