Swearing and certain comments

president Nawrocki's message was different from that of politicians in Poland. I mean the erstwhile presidents and prime ministers. The president turned out to be a large orator and, above all, individual well-oriented in matters crucial to Poland, presenting a program for repairing what Poland present puts into a state of turbulence, not to say, decay. I guess no of the listeners doubted that the president would execute the signaled projects under his authority. I do not usage the word: promises, due to the fact that it is completely devalued. Is that how the president's speech was understood by Deputy Prime Minister Gawkowski, as well as others from the Coalition on 13 December? Doubtful. The Deputy Prime Minister assured that the government was besides ready to cooperate where possible. But he immediately stated that “Poland is governed by the government, not by the president.” A small besides colloquially added. that "If the president thinks that he will be giving out cards present and he will be managing the state in Poland, he is in a large mistake or he has not read the constitution. We are surely open to cooperation, but wherever the president goes beyond his competence, he will get his hands on it." No 1 with specified a kinder art should talk to the President, especially Gawkowski, who besides believes that the announced amendment of the Constitution leads to a change in the system, i.e. to "soft authoritarianism". Perhaps that's why the Deputy Prime Minister countdowns the days to the end of Nawrock's presidency. All of this together more than another statements by the Coalition people indicates a certain panic in which their message caused them. With that countdown, I remember Tusk counting off president Duda's days. You know how it worked out. As for "soft authoritarianism", Gawkowski, as the full Tusk government, already applies murderism today. due to the fact that what else is violent entry into the media, application of the law according to your own understanding, harassment of people questionable about their legality with committees? Who said anything about taking the Republic's license? Who violates the Constitution and the full strategy of the regulation of law, citing a bubel created by Tusk called “a fighting democracy”? What change of strategy does the Deputy Prime Minister mean in connection with the revision of the Constitution? By virtue of his authority, the president has an work to take initiatives specified as work around the Constitution.

So either Gawkowski does not realize the lawlessness on which the full government he represents stands, or does not realize what president Nawrocki said.

Deputy Prime Minister Kosiniak-Kamish besides spoke from the people who are presently crucial in politics. In short, he recognized the Message as a devastating criticism of ten-year-old government PiSu and president Duda. Naïveness and any disinvolvement in Mr. Kosiniak-Kamish's enunciations does not surprise anyone. We're just utilized to it, but erstwhile he claims that individual of your president has misled you, due to the fact that infrastructure investments "moved during our word of office," But he should explain what he means, due to the fact that the only investments undertaken by the Tusk government are witch hunting. He besides criticised the deficiency of topics related to Polish countryside and agriculture. He thinks "I think it was completely sick thought out." He said that he was amazed by the crushing criticism of 10 years of the presidency of Andrzej Duda and the government of the Law and Justice that Poland is simply a subsidiary of the EU, According to him, Poland is in the vanguard of Europe and is developing rapidly. However, this optimism would be on the ground with respect to governments before 15 X 2023, erstwhile specified dynamism was visible to the bare eye. That's nothing. Kosiniak-Kamysz offered the president a gathering "to explain to him the issues in which he stated he was misled". It is not essential to bother to explain to Kosiniak what the mistake he made erstwhile he claims that Poland is “in the vanguard of Europe and is developing rapidly” during the government of the Coalition. It's just Deputy Prime Minister Tuska has liberated himself by making jokes.

Roman Gierty, as always reaching for the neckless manipulation of the law. In a video, published just before the swearing-in, associate of the civilian Coalition, Roman Gierty presented his annex to the minutes of the Assembly, in which he indicated that he did not support the marshal's decision to accept the oath from Nawrocki. Therefore, the National Assembly has no consensus on this issue, and the act of accepting an oath is simply a violation of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland, as it deprives citizens of the right to be heard by the ultimate Court. All because, as he wishes, the decision of Marshal Holownia "violates the Constitution" due to the fact that "the electoral protest has not ended", and in peculiar "the ultimate Court's ruling on the validity of the elections has not been issued and tens of thousands of citizens' electoral protests have not been recognised". He left out that he himself was the author of most of them. This is the current "liberum veto" and votum separatum Romana Giertych.

Mr Tuska, Mr Waldemar Żurek, in turn, believes that if there is simply a discrepancy with the President, of course I have a plan B. I would like to propose to the president the statutory solutions best for Poles. If the president has a different opinion, he will gotta justify it legally and I think it's going to be the president's hardest. The beetle clearly cannot imagine how hard it will be for him to explain what he is doing now.

Tusk reacts differently. It makes it clear that the president will either give a pricet to his actions or war. He is underpinned, as usual by Kosiniak-Kamish, who was seemingly eager to close a store called PSL, due to the fact that his fagging “Smiled’ It can't end otherwise. She may finish Poland with her "infrastructure investments" until the end of her term, but the consequence of Gawkowski's "deduction" will most likely follow no longer from the Sejm jury. What about PSL? If it is reborn, reaching to its roots, then, as once, it will service Poland. The second comments do not take into account, as the issue which their authors service ends in a dark tunnel, from which Poland and president Nawrocki are coming out.