Voting. Elections. NATION beguiled!

Saved in Constitution III RP/PRL BIS.

Article 4.1.Authority in Poland belongs to the Nation. 2. The nation exercises power by its representatives or directly. Article 104.1. Members are representatives of the Nation. They're not bound by the electoral instructions.

Then let each and all 1 of them answer their own questions. If Members do not bind the electoral instructions, what does it tie them to? Who does the MP answer to?

Article 10.1. The strategy of the Republic of Poland is based by division and balance Legislative, executive and judicial authority. 2. Legislative power hold the Sejm and the Senate, executive authorityPresident of the Republic of Poland and Council of Ministersand the judicial authority of courts and tribunals. Article 103.1.Member's mandate cannot be combined with function president of the National Bank of Poland, president of the ultimate Chamber of Control, Ombudsman, Ombudsman and their deputies, associate of the Monetary Policy Council, associate of the National Radio and tv Council, ambassador and with employment in the Chancellery of the Sejm, Chancellery of the Senate, Chancellery of the president of the Republic or with employment in government administration. This prohibition shall not apply to the members of the Council of Ministers and the Secretarys of State in government administration.

Clearly a logical contradiction.Article 10 is writtenthat the strategy of the Polish Republic is based on the division and balance of authorities to this deny in Article 103. For a messenger as a associate Legislative authority may be a associate of the government = executive authority.

25-05-1997. occurred Constitutional referendum.The voters were 28 324 965. The vote took place 12.139.790 what was 42.86% eligible. 52.7% voted in favour a fresh Constitution. Multiplying both numbers (0.4286 x 0.527) = 0.2258722 = 22.58722%. After rounding (28.3 million ≥ 22.6%) = 6.4 million people decided to adopt a fresh Constitution in POLAND.

The ultimate Court in POLANDconsidered the referendum important, although little than half of the eligible members took part. The explanatory memorandum reads.The attendance request of 50% was not mentioned In THE CONSTITUTIONAL Act, and she had the legal order in force at the time greater precedence than average REFERENDATION PROCESS. The Constitutional Act simply referred to the request for a majority of voters to adopt the Constitution. That's what happened. Concluding. The bill's no match. And so it is to this day.

cdn