From my observations of the election run so far, it seems that Mr Trzaskowski's speeches stand out in the global assessment of the ongoing debate with 3 features: they are charged with artificial emotion (gifts, shouts, sometimes intentional gibberish), ambiguities erstwhile it comes to the presidential program, inextricable, places, rhetoric and large nervousness, it is hard to say whether artificially generated or due to the appeal of the speaker. any conspicuous intelligence in these appearances is not visible.
Meanwhile, Mrs. Aleksandr Pawlicka in the alleged TVP (no 1 knows what to call it today?) in the program "Political Triangle" together with Marek Belka decided to repair the already bitten image of Trzaskowski, showing him as a model of "good president". Belka supported this thesis with a mention to Trzaskowski's intelligence, which supposedly represented Poland in an global forum in an excellent way, but which is besides haughty and represents the intelligent class, [yes - ZZ] that it does not fit with Poles. Everyone knows that if individual falls into the mud, it's best to go ahead. And so did Belka. Renata Grochal clearly threw the footbridge at his feet, asking: Can the intelligent Warsaw composer's boy win the elections in the region Poland? If Trzaskowski doesn't go to fight on his field, he doesn't go to the Republic... Grochal easy mowed intelligence from “Polish county”. The beam said that Trzaskowski is harder to win the presidential election than to be a large president. Because according to him, society underestimates qualities specified as planet orientation, intelligence. I think the individual who could someway connect it was Aleksander Kwasniewski. The beam constantly thinks it is censored by KC PZPR. But the fact is that Kwasniewski was so much better than Trzaskowski, and there is no uncertainty that Kwasniewski would have besides gone to the debate with the Republic and would not have justified anyone's absence, as Belka does, claiming that There's a spa, not a average fight.. Belka did not aid Trzaskowski, but he sported himself excellently. You can say what you utilized to say about bourbon. He besides did not forget anything and did not learn anything, and left the Poles the inheritance of "Belka's tax". As Prime Minister and Head of the National Bank, he did not admit anything. He is now trying to empathize with the harsh irony of the right, frustrate
So Poles do not fit into Trzaskowski, “smart by birth”. specified a test of the communist, guilty of respect for the working people, is simply a manifestation of specified frustration! It can even find the result of the election. due to the fact that as Belka goes on, the president should be simple, violent, put individual in the head. Just like Nawrocks. If Nawrocki should give individual a "head", it is Belce for his arrogance and harm in intelligence, seemingly completely traced to Trzaskowski.
By the way. There are any ambiguities in the question of who organized the Trzaskowski debate? The seemingly simple question: who organised this debate is highly complicated. In order not to get into details: the TVP worker in the liquidation of Joanna Danikowska-Paź convinced that the organizer was the election staff of the presidential candidate Rafał Trzaskowski. Renata Grochal, on the another hand, said that this was a debate organised, among another things, by TVP. Another crucial news is that tv Poland, TVN24 and Polsat have implemented this debate and made the signal available for free. The second is crucial due to the fact that it involves a financial burden. The head of the KRRiT, Mr Świrski, so asked the PKW to examine the facts and to measure clearly whether the debate was organised in violation of the law. The Świrski referred to these provisions in his writing.
I am convinced that the law will be applied here as Tusk and Bodnar realize it. due to the fact that the prosecutors and the courts are independent of the law. and subjected as tools in the hands of both mentioned above. This is the lawfulness that has earned so much praise from Mrs. von der Leyen. Let's see what happens this time.
