Who could benefit from the coup 6 VIII?

The designation of the importance of Karol Nawrocki's election by the ultimate Court was recognised by most politicians, even the coalitions of the PO. In the square of the conflict against the decision of the SN, Gierty remained, who seconds Tusk, becoming more nervous, not knowing what to do with his hands, how to master the stuttering, how to express a thought. Kalisz besides picked up on him, but he warms up the charges brought against Nawrock and his household in connection with the "cavalier".

1 can imagine how oppressed the Holovnia is to thwart the oath on August 6. He has a large function to play, and if he does as he said many times, he will enter history. If he succumbs to Tusk and Giertych, he will be erased from it, as will the two. So the hoard has everything to win, nothing to lose. All he has to do is stick to the law, which in Tusk's strategy is not obvious. Rzeczpospolita is yet a value for nothing, so any things cannot be forgiven Tusk, Bodnar, Giertych, and a number of government members are aware of this, who have dared to break the law without doing their duty. The Minister of Domanski can be cited as an example.

Contrary to apparent obviousness, the very short-lived profit could come to Tusk and the government. Short-lived, for neither Tusk nor his government have reason to exist. So at best for the election, no further.

However, there are respective people in the current power team, whose only immunity protects them from responsibility. It was granted to people who, without it, would gotta prosecute the law and be deprived of those who were wanted regardless of reality, to oppress. This is the most crucial manifestation of illegality, and it requires settlement not in the mode of revenge, but in the form of a legal requirement.

A man who is now highly determined to prosecute a coup d'état, Roman Gierty, has, in fact, no another reason. to do so. The Polnord investigation was dropped by the ruling squad of Tusk, which Giertyche protected due to the fact that she needed it. It's hard to tell what the result of the conduct will be, but the fainting of Gierty in the face of trying to halt him, alternatively does not propose optimism. That's why Gierty is most curious in individual reasons, so that no 1 can get to power who decides to resume the Polnord case.

Tusk will gotta explain to the court what he meant, saying that he will apply the law “as he understands it” and what “a fighting democracy” is. He will besides gotta explain the situations in which these different legal maxims were applied. But this is simply a question of abuse of power, and in Gierty's case the burden of prosecution has a different dimension, with a policy not having much in common. The colossal profit is measurable, however, paid for by diphamation. Guys like Gierty are waiting in line for the DA.

So if the oath of president Nawrocki was to be blocked on August 6, it would be the worst thing for Poland, which no of the ruling teams in the 3rd Republic did. However, no 1 could presume that he would avoid being responsible. Hoarders can promise a advanced position. However, it is worth recalling what Zaglob promised to Karol Gustav.