British anti-immigration activist Mark Collett, leader of the Patriotic alternate organization, has been detained and deported by the Swedish Border defender just after arriving at Arlanda airport close Stockholm. The man was to give a speech during a debate organized by the right-wing Det fria Sverige (Free Sweden) association in the city of Töreboda in the center of the country.
The Swedes deported the Englishman for informing against mass immigration. According to the authorities, he was detained and then deported due to the fact that allegedly "represents a threat to public order, the social structure and the values on which Sweden and Europe are built".
Swedish deportation steam is based on U Acttlänningslagen (Chapter 8, Articles 11-12) which entitles to refuse entry to abroad nationals who are deemed to constitute "A genuine and sufficiently serious threat to fundamental social interest". Critics argue that the bill aims to prevent critics of the left-liberal government from entering the country, based solely on their opinions in public space alternatively than on actual criminal activity.
According to Collett's report, he was held at the airport for over 25 hours, without access to his luggage and passport, even though he was not suspected of committing any crime. "After more than 25 hours of being stuck at the airport, 2 police officers yet came and announced it was time to return. They walked me to the gate and made certain I got on a direct flight home” – he wrote on the Telegram.
Apart from describing his persecution, Collett besides pointed out a much more crucial issue: no EU country would dare to treat an illegal immigrant the way the Swedish Border defender treated him, although he came to this country legally. Negro and arabian invaders are not in any way checked whether they have committed any crime in the country of origin and are a threat to Sweden’s public security. Brani are with all the luggage and who they are, it turns out only later erstwhile they commit any crime themselves, or within a criminal group.
Mark Collett is simply a well-known British activist who proclaims a political program critical of immigration. The mass immigration of the "third world" peoples to Europe is indeed destructive and negative, and informing about them is not a threat to Swedish interests. On the contrary, getting free of immigrants would aid reconstruct safety in the streets.
Collett is not under investigation in the UK or any another country, and no information indicates that he was planning something illegal. Nevertheless, his very presence was considered incompatible with the “Swedish values”. Its expulsion proves ideologically motivated border control in Europe, behind which leftist-liberal regimes stand.
Interestingly, alternatively of deploring the expanding censorship and fascism of the Swedish Border Guard, the media have utilized the chance to usage Attack Colletta. They baptized him, among others, as “neonazist”, “white suprematist” and “a very right-wing extremist”.
Let us remind you that the UK authorities are no better than Swedish. In fresh years, they have not allowed in their territory and deported, among others, the writer's publicist Rafał Ziemkiewicz, who flew to the islands for private purposes (his daughter is studying at 1 of the universities there). This man besides has no conflict with law in Poland or another countries.
Our next interview with Mark Collet:
Question: On your last journey to Sweden, a real scandal broke out. But before we get to that, could you tell our readers what your destination was in Scandinavia?
Answer:
I traveled to Sweden to attend the Free Sweden summertime Festival. It is simply a social event based on household and community. The festival includes various activities, and I was to give a short speech on building a community. I was besides expected to attend dinner Friday night with friends and companions. It was, of course, a peaceful event, and there was no riot or illegal activity.
I have travelled Europe many times – I have been to France, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, the Netherlands, Finland, Czech Republic, Latvia, Belgium and Spain. I have never been accused of committing a crime on European dirt and have never participated in any riots.
I have given speeches in many European countries and the events I have spoken on have been completely peaceful and there have never been any problems. Before that, I was besides in the European Parliament as a individual accompanying 2 MEPs.
Furthermore, in the UK, I have no criminal evidence and I belong to a legal and registered group conducting social campaigns that build a community and affirmative activities for those in need.
Question: So you were denied entry to Sweden. What are the reasons for this decision? What precisely happened?
Answer:
I have been considered a threat to public policy, a threat to the structure of society and a threat to the fundamental values on which Sweden and the European Union are based. In fact, the authorities have stated that if I give a thirty-minute speech on European soil, the threat to the EU will be so large that the tissue of society itself will be threatened. I was so banned from entering the Schengen area for the next 15 years.
The ban process began erstwhile I was in line for passport control. I was pulled out of it, my passport was confiscated, I was not allowed to access my luggage, and then 2 police officers led me to a tiny area where I was interrogated. The questions afraid all aspect of my life – my family, destination, erstwhile partners, financial situation and the place where I was going to stay.
A fewer hours after the hearing, I was brought back to this small room, this time in front of 4 officers. I was read the decision to refuse entry into Sweden, to deport and to ban entry into the Schengen area for 15 years.
Then I was brought back to the departure hall and told to wait. I was not given food or water, bed was not provided, I was denied access to my luggage, I had no passport and I received no information about erstwhile the deportation took place. I sat there for 25 hours until 2 officers approached me, took me to the gate, put me on a plane, and then they gave me my passport.
I've been treated much worse than any illegal migrant! In Britain, erstwhile illegal migrants arrive, they are immediately placed in luxury hotels, receiving food, water and medical care.
Question: On what grounds have you been banned from entering the Schengen area? Who made that decision?
Answer:
I do not know precisely who made this decision; it was handed to me by an officer who read the message he had previously prepared, which he was given. There seems to be very small work for this decision, and I have never received or been offered legal assistance. There was no appropriate procedure or chance to present my case properly.
Question: What do you think is the real reason for specified treatment by the Swedish authorities? Finally, it is rather striking that a supposedly "tolerant" country like Sweden acts in specified a openly totalitarian way and treats the individual poorly solely due to its views.
Answer:
The fact that the European Union is so afraid of my thirty-minute speech is both a compliment and a sign that the people in the heart of the EU are terrified — due to the fact that they know that there is simply a widespread change in public opinion and that Europeans are turning distant from multiculturalism and mass immigration. Ultimately, those who regulation the EU are afraid of the fact and afraid of Europeans openly opposed to authoritative state narrative.
The EU has fundamentally declared me the most dangerous man in Europe! Now I am the most banned, deflated, and devoid of access to banking man throughout Europe — even though I have never committed any crime. I am banned from entering more countries, have lost more bank accounts and have been blocked on more platforms than any another man in Europe. And my only “guilt” is to tell the fact and fight for the endurance of European nations.
The fact that the European establishment is so afraid of 1 man to give a short speech shows how terrified they are that their task of multiculturalism is failing. Unfortunately, it is not a single incidental — it is part of a wider attack on freedom of speech. Those who regulation the European Union are so terrified that Europeans reject the communicative of multiculturalism that they will increasingly censor freedom of speech and restrict the rights of their own citizens.
Question: Leftist organizations have announced “success” and claim that you were refused entry due to the fact that you are a neo-Nazi. How Would You Answer?
Answer:
This is an absurd and unprecedented decision that does not only affect me but besides my household — due to the fact that now I cannot travel abroad on a household vacation, which will, of course, affect my children. They call me a Nazi to distract me from the real reason for this scandal. The fact is that this decision exposes the actual nature of the "border control" in Europe.
It is simply a violation of my human rights to take distant my right to travel to European countries to participate in legitimate democratic activities. Moreover, erstwhile I am refused entry into Europe, millions of migrants arrive each year without any control, and the EU not only allows them to stay, but gives them all the privileges they can get.
It is apparent that the EU would alternatively have thousands of rapists and criminals enter the Schengen area without any control than let 1 white man with a "inappropriate opinion" to give a speech on European soil. Border control applies only to Europeans, and migrants from Africa, the mediate East and the Indian subcontinent can decision without restriction!
The Left are absolute hypocrites — they want a planet without borders and they claim to be fighting for “human rights” and at the same time celebrate erstwhile a law-abiding white citizen is denied entry into Sweden. It is clear: the left grants “the rights of man” only to foreigners — rapists and criminals whom they will defend to the ground. However, white, law-abiding Europeans clearly do not deserve “human rights”.
I will do everything in my power to fight this anti-democratic conviction and I hope that 1 day I will return to Sweden to talk to those who are fighting for the interests of the Swedish people.
—
Thank you for bringing this scandal closer to Polish readers.
—
Q: During your fresh journey to Sweden, a real scandal occured. But before we get to that, could you delight tell our readers what was the intent of your journey to Scandinavia?
And you travel to Sweden to attend the Free Sweden summertime festival. It is simply a household and community based social event. The event features a variety of activities and I was going to give a short velocity about community building. I was besides due to attend a dinner on the Friday evening with friends and commrades. This was celebrated a peaceful event, and there was no disturbance or unlawful activity.
I have traveled to Europe many times – I have been to France, Germany, Sweden, Denmark, Holland, Finland, the Czech Republic, Latvia, Belgium, and Spain. Never erstwhile had I been admitted of committing a crime while on European dirt and I have never been active in any form of disorder.
I have given speedes in many European countries, and the events at which I addressed were completely peaceful and there were never any problems. I have besides previously been to the European Parliament accompanying 2 MPS.
What’s more, at home in the UK I have no criminal evidence and am part of a lawful and registered campaigning group that engines in community building and affirmative advertising for those in needed.
Q: We realize that you were killed entry into Sweden. What reason was given for this action? What precisely happened?
I was deemed to be a 3 to public order, a 3 to the fabric of society and a 3 to the fundamental values on which Sweden and the EU are built. In essence, the authorizations have stood that if I were to remove a third-minute velocity on European soil, the danger posted to EU would be so large that the very fabric of society would be under Threat. As such, I am doomed from entering the Schengen region for the next 15 years.
The process of the ban being handed down began erstwhile I was in the queer to go through the passport check. I was pulled out of the quize, my passport was confiscated, I was not allowed access to my luggage and I was evenly taken to a tiny area by 2 police officials and asked. The questions covered all aspect of my life – including my family, reasons for traveling, my ex-girlfriends, my financial situation and where And you intending to stay.
A fewer hours after being asked, I was taken back to that tiny area and this time 4 officials were present. I was reading the ruling that I was being deied entry into Sweden, that I was to be deported and that I was banned from entering the Schengen region for 15 years.
I was then taken back to the department lounge and told to sit and wait. I was not given food or water, I was not provided with a bed, I was deprived access to my luggage, I had no passport and I was not given any information on erstwhile I was being deported. I sat like that for 25 hours, before 2 officials recommended me, took me to a gate, boarded me on a plan and yet handed back my passport.
And you're treated far worse than any illegal migrant! In Britain, erstwhile illegal migrants arrive they are taken consecutive to plush hotels, are given food, water and medical care.
Q: On what grounds were you issued a ban on entering the Schengen Area? Who made that decision?
I do not know precisely who made the decision; the decision was handed down to me by an authoritative reading a pre-written message that had been given to him. There seems to be very small accountability, and I was never provided with, or offered, legal representation. There was no due process, and no ability to decently argue my case.
Q: What do you believe is the real reason for the way you were treated by the Swedish authorities? It is, after all, fast striking that a supposedly “tolerant” country like Sweden would act in specified a topantly totalitarian manner and mistreat a individual solely due to their views.
The fact the EU is that frightened of me making a 30-minute velocity is both a compliance and a sign that these at the very heart of the European Union are scared, as they know that there is simply a widespread change in public opinion and that European people are turning against multilateralism and mass immigration. Ultimately, that in charge of the EU Fear the fact and the Fear Europeans open speaking out against the state narrative.
The EU has fundamentally designed me as the most dangerous man in Europe! I am now the most banned, deflated and debanked man in the full of Europe – yet I have never committed a crime. I am banned from more countries, have lost more bank accounts and have been banned from more platforms than any another man in Europe. Yet my only departure is speaking the fact and fighting for the endurance of the European people.
For the establishment in Europe to be so verified of 1 man making a short velocity shows just how sorted they are that their multicultural task is failing. Sadly though, this is not an isolated event, this is all part of a widget crackdown on freedom of speed. That in charge of the EU are so terrorized that the European people are retaking the multicultural narrative, that they will actively censor free velocity and curtail the rights of their own citizens.
Q: Leftist organizations have declared “success” and claimed that you were turned distant due to the fact that you are a neo-Nazi. How would you respond to that?
This is an absurd and unprecedented decision and it does not only impact me, but it besides harms my household as I now can not travel outside for household holidays, which will of course affect my children. Yet they call me a Nazi in order draw attention distant from the fact behind this scandal. The real fact is that this rulking exposes the actual nature of ‘border control’ in Europe.
To prevent me, a household man, from traveling to European nations to engage in lawful democratic activities is simply a breeze of my human rights, but what makes this bag, is that while I am denied entry to Europe, millions of migrants arrive each year full unchecked and the EU does not only let them to stay, but hands them all benefit immaginable.
It is clear: the EU would alternatively let thousands of rapits and criminals enter the Schengen region unchecked than they would let a single White man with the ‘wrong opinion’ make a velocity on European soil. Border control is clear only for Europeans, whereas migrants from Africa, the mediate East and the Indian subcontinent can go where they want without restriction!
The left are absolute hypocrites, as they want for a planet with open borders and say that they champion ‘human rights’, yet celebrated erstwhile a law-abiding white citizen is deied entry to Sweden. It is clear: the left only grants ‘human rights’ to abroad rapits and criminals, who they will defend to the death. But white, law-abiding Europeans are popularly not worth of ‘human rights’.
I will do everything I can to fight this undemocratic rulking and hope 1 day to return to Sweden to address these who fight for the interests of the Swedish people.
–
Thank you for bringing this scandal to the attention of Polish readers.
We besides recommend: Labour marketplace crisis in Poland. Immigrants deepen it
