Second word of office of the Law and Justice

ekskursje.pl 8 years ago

My soschial media bubble is full of mockery from the president's Saturday speech – that it will rebuild the locks, that it will revitalize intelligence (what did Nicholas, Wilq?). However, nobody speaks positively about the platformed counter-party.

The conclusion is clear to me. Only the intervention of a mythical pregnant nun can take a second word from PiS.

The platform has no thought how to attract voters. The slogans “not for the PiS” are negative.

But specifically, Mr. Schetina, what do you gotta offer me? How will my life get better erstwhile you come to power?

That you will “count those liable for lying to Poles”? Why don't you start these accounts with what was incorrect with the po government? If you “stand the wall behind Hanka”, you will end up like a CODE, besides long “standing the wall behind Matthew”.

Meanwhile, PiS sent its voters 2 concrete reasons to vote for themselves. And I can realize the voter that it works on.

The first is simply a promise "we will not let refugees in, it will be safer thanks to that". It doesn't work on me for the reasons I've presented here many times.

Fear of refugees was created artificially, with the aid of Facebook news about the “Sharia zones” and “Sweden on the brink of civilian war”. I travel Europe adequate to know it's bullshit. But I realize that who knows London or Berlin mostly from TVPiS can be fooled.

Michał Sutowski in my broadcast, however, pointed out that the Platform did not have a good repost from the beginning. They did not exposure nonsense, they indirectly legitimized it – presenting for their success the negotiation of a minimum relocation pool with the Union (so they admitted there was something on the subject).

More serious is the second promise, which, I admit, already works for me. These are Morawiecki's words that the VAT seal itself managed to finance 500+ – ergo, as long as the Law and Justice Office governs, the rich will besides pay taxes.

If the po has a repost for it, I don't know her. I have the impression that on Saturday they did not make any mention to this, strengthening the impression that the VAT carousel was in favour of the silent approval of the erstwhile government (such as reprivatisation scams were in favour of the silent approval of the platformed town hall, the platformed ministry and the legal environment, which is about to defend its independence).

Perhaps my impression is wrong. In fact, I'd like that very much. I cordially invitation my friends sympathizing with the PO to make up for this gap in blog comments and present a proplatform view of these issues.

Of course, that promise won't make me vote for the PiS either. You know who I'm voting for. But until the PO addresses these issues, I do not want to vote for them in any variant, besides in the "United Opposition" variant.

Defense of the Constitution? defence of pluralism in public media? Yeah. Defence of pro-European orientation? Yeah.

But the defence of taxation frauds? Defending those liable for unusual reprivatization decisions? Defending businessmen who don't pay their employees? HELL NO.

The opposition itself manipulated into a situation where Matthew K., Rafał B., Jerzy M and Hanna G-W became her faces. Its name is the restaurant “Father S. and friends”.

For all the initiatives of the Platform and the Modern Law and Justice, it will so have a fatally effective repost: "they shout due to the fact that they long for taxation optimization and reprivatisation of eldorado". Checkmate, sweeping.

I don't like PiS, but I don't like scammers and exploiters any more. If someone's business thought is not to pay employees' wages or taxes, it's not "minor evil" to me.

I'd like to end this with any optimistic accent, but I can't. I'm preparing melancholy for my second word of Law and Justice. possibly there's something optimistic to say to the PTs.

Read Entire Article