The way Europeans go to the agenda with the disturbing information they receive all day is alarming. They slow get utilized to burning dumpsters and cars in the streets of their cities, terrorist attacks, rapes and robberies. To live in uncertainty, from crisis to crisis. They are slow retreating into a private sphere (where there is inactive specified a normality) by nodding everything that happens over their heads, fearing that rocking this accumulating boat will harm them. The era of freedom is over, since they have ceased to be hosts in their own country, so they hold on to the dignity that property gives them, the state of possession. Sometimes the voice of the protest can be seen as a distraction that will not change anything if it slows down inevitable reforms. Reforms aimed at illusory perfection, love and brotherhood of the peoples of the old continent, due to the fact that surely not to universal prosperity. fewer people decision to implement this alleged sustainable improvement consists of looting savings through fresh tributes and constant devaluation of money, damaging economies of speculative-credit financial system, allowing the migration of primitive confederate peoples destroying the laws and order of Western civilization, incapacitating full nations by another nations and transnational organizations, the collapse of the Catholic church and the values of which he was a guardian, eco-terrorism cultivated by the Brussels elites, modern indoctrination of youth, profiling citizens with visible electronic money, which will make the eventual protective umbrella (control) of power over well-dressed mob.
Where are the Poles in all this? Somewhere halfway, but calmly, we'll shortly catch up with our more civilized brothers. The planet stood on its head and moved neatly, pushed by hysterical forces reasoning they had a mandate to save it, read it at your discretion, while besides leading to the appropriation and control of all aspect of our lives. To fit us in a frame that won't be a way out. We already have problems with that today. As humans, we are in the position of individual falling off the roof of a skyscraper. He rushes down to break his neck, but as long as the wind pleasantly washes his face, he functions as if the mention point was his individual and the air around him, not the concrete to which the gathering is going. The Union, Britain, America and half the world, all reason with akin patterns, with glass screens. They look at what they see there as part of the show, like theater, not reality affecting us. They are deceived that this does not concern them, that they can cut off from it by pressing the button on the remote, dragging their finger on the telephone window, in a second moving into a different dimension, where 1 can breathe from the view of a giant mountain of challenges that spend sleep with the eyelids of a modern man. Mountains so ridiculously immense that 1 person's head is impossible to comprehend. At this point, I should change the individual from them to us. So what are we doing in the face of this mountain? We run distant from responsibility, from reaction, from action, closing in our comfortable bubbles. We calculate and keep quiet. We're silent so we don't lose what we have, but we'll lose it silently. If not us, then our children.
We no longer trust our beliefs, our reason, but we absolutely believe in the infallibility of setting standards of media behaviour and reasoning and omniscient public opinion. We surrender to their will, due to the fact that it is easier for us to swallow that the standards set by the full society, not by a group or class. We believe that we are moving forward, even if the arguments do not scope us. We presume that most people are right, alternatively of following their minds, no substance what conclusions this would lead us to. Finally, the evolution of our views should be the consequence of a progressive process of self-education, not following interpretations provided by questionable authorities and polling. However, specified an approach is rare. Many have their own views, but are afraid to express them loudly. Fear of losing the privileges of being a respected associate of the community, before marking a madman's patch, a subversive who undermines an uncertain order. It is so that freedom and freedom spread in man uncertainty, and it may have been easier for him to rip his hands off in erstwhile oppressive systems. For communes he had to think and follow the orders of power at the cost of life and freedom, in democracy he can think and do whatever he wants, at the cost of social exclusion, to become an outcast upon whom all the remainder of the alleged public opinion will look with contempt or pity. Stick to the truths, follow the tide, or you'll be stuck on a cliff, adjust, or you'll be off. Today, constancy in views is treated with any fear, it is thought to be an outcast, a symptom of radicalism, although only it allows us to separate what is valuable, rational and timeless, from what is the consequence of momentary fashion. Universal access to information should, of course, increase the number of self-thinking people (who usually have powerfully established views), thereby multiplying the number of opinions, unfortunately leading to their simplification and convergence, in a direction that depends on current trends and popularity of certain beliefs. This is due to the indivisible regulation of multidimensional tolerance, which the friars of all unpopular opinions treat with the expression of noble outrage, in the name of which is considered almost a symptom of belonging to the aristocracy of political correctness.
The values that gave us the courage to fight, the nonconformism that allowed us to keep clarity of head and take care of what was truly crucial disappear. They are marginalised, as is the solidarity of citizens, which has become an empty slogan on trade union banners. How could it be different if everyone thinks they can last the current social transformation alone? It'll work out. Good will prevail, as will peace, freedom, justice and progress. But first, they will be undermined, demolished, and trampled by the weak and the wicked. They'll be degeneration if we halt defending them at a crucial moment. Why at a crucial moment? For until late human wickedness, the vileness of power and elites, though sometimes unimaginable, was limited in their influence. Until recently. However, its impact has increased dramatically over the past decades to get closer to the summit present (thanks to the method and financial means available to extend it). Worse still, the face of power softened, and the methods of enslavement of the masses. They became elaborate, subtle, even taking the form of caring. We see them in extremes, but not in everyday life. And even if we see them, in exchange for certain privileges, we overlook them, convinced of their small harm. We surrender. After all, individual has to manage, keep order so that we don't become barbarians again, right? The social agreement said that in order for all citizen to be able to deal with their insignificant matters in peace, the authorities would represent him in matters of importance. Authorities chosen from the people. In the east, west and here in Poland. And we choose, why do we inactive get the impression that we're ruled by mediocrity? The Germans and Russians couldn't kill them all, since they're not much better.
Where are the elites of the first water erstwhile the voice is second and third? Smart people don't push into politics? For the sake of peace, are they getting out of the way to screamers and careers? Apparently, since our terrible political scene is not fighting for Poland, but only for power, positions and money. The worst part is that the public either does not see it or does not mind, as the results of the upcoming elections will most likely attest to. Or are we voting for the incorrect people? Can't we put our affairs in the right hands? Apparently, due to the fact that it takes an intellectual effort, which is so hard these days. And the authorities see it and do everything they can to keep it as long as possible. It doesn't substance democratic or autocratic. They treat the subjects with superiority, 1 might say, in a fatherly way, but that the fathers want to prepare their children for adulthood, but the authorities search to guarantee that citizens never grow up from childhood. Where are these our representatives who would act according to the words of John Stuart Mill: “Who is obliged to pay, to fight, and to obey, should besides have the right to know why he is doing it, to give his approval or to refuse it, to know that his opinion means something.” I don't see them. I don't feel like my opinion means anything either, most likely like many of you.
How does it all end? What will happen to Europe and the strategy here? By the end of the erstwhile century, systems were failing, at a time erstwhile the communities in them began to see the intellectual misery of the systems themselves and the mediocre grounds for further order and morals by their representatives. The 21st century is fresh here. Although the symptoms of the breakdown of the western socio-economic model can be seen with the bare eye, there is small indication that it should shortly be forgotten. Similarly, it is with its creators who stubbornly defend the incorrect directions and decisions—the authorities, above all European, who lose their mandate to establish signposts day by day, to follow the group's lead, and this is due to the violation of the economic, legal, social and moral principles to which the defences were called. So what makes the present order bravely defended and people blindly believed in it, remaining indifferent to all its pathologies? inactive a advanced standard of surviving and seeming only safety, clouding the uncritical mass, neglect of the authorities. Powers increasing strong, cynical, though seemingly mild, declaring their willingness to meet all our needs, including saving us the problem of thinking. There is no request for plots and plots, it is adequate for shortsightedness and evil will to degrade law and politics, global and interpersonal relations, cultures and customs, as it were, step by step. With or without the participation of external directors, surely in full audience. Slowly, with small opposition from the audience.
So what is the future? I'm not counting on revolution. There will be no large awakening and overthrow. We're besides divided, we're spoiled. We are not threatened by large wars, if these interior conflicts, which slow germinate in the heart of Europe, are due to various masses of visitors from the south, conscious weaknesses and foolishness of their hosts. Relax, they'll get to us too. Already present we have this foretaste (and I am not just talking about Southerners here - thanks to the policy of the open border with Ukraine, thousands of criminals from there went to Poland; although not much is said about it, the first Ukrainian gangs are formed in Podkarpacie and, in the absence of services, they slow grow their activities across the country). If the EU economy endures the clash with the reborn powers, we will most likely proceed to live comparatively comfortable, though not decent. From guarded office buildings and galleries to its modern settlements and houses powered by wind and surrounded by barbed wire, we will decision with electrical cars. Separated from the dirt of the street with reinforced windows, like white residents of Johannesburg. Churches will turn into museums and galleries, possibly replaced by mosques. I don't know what's worse. The cries of the number will silence the majority and will change the customs that have prevailed here for centuries. fresh taxes will be created, which will mainly charge autochthons. We will not be exhausted by hunger, if we are already hungry, it will be limited access to the good quality food that fewer people can afford. Finishing, however, will proceed for years, in blissful ignorance, as is the case today. I anticipate further division and isolation of social individuals, indifference to the affairs of the country and continent, focus on their own safety and immediate benefits, on the fight for the standard. This will, of course, make it easier for the local authorities (the local authorities and their powerholders) to include more areas of our freedom. The next crises will make the masses even more dependent on the States, transnational creations and media, social care and bureaucracy will last another youth, resulting in a multitude of new, absurdly detailed standards, laws and rules. And so on and so on. However, erstwhile writing with heartache, I inactive hope that this black script will not come true. That increasing generations, torn from tradition and trapped in virtual reality, will scope the wall and gotta look into their eyes. They'll gotta defy all this. Face the intellectual prison they're in, face this protective tyranny that wants to decide their fate. ]]>https://eyewatcher.blogspot.com/]]>
