The hierarchy of key themes-nothing means nothing according to S. Mentzen.

It surely turned out that it was not to guarantee the preservation of free Poland, nor rights and freedoms for Poles, nor free marketplace laws and the implementation of open competitions for all state posts or public tenders. Nor is the legitimacy of Polexit of the 4th EU Reich. Not even the right to individual defence and home miru with the usage of legally available firearms. The subject which he dominated temporarily "talk" performed in the form of a 1.5-hour elder examination, became one-gaj municipal studio of the name of Mr. And that's strictly according to an abwehrous provocation. This interviewing candidate, like a checker, dropped out after Mr. Mentzen's first round, he's a declarative freeman. The second time-consuming “talk” issue is its own monologue of questions, as a narcissistic financial-bankster authority a’la Balcerowicz and pharmacies repeated since the latter. As a self-promotion version yntelect the current chief fins (e.g., that higher interest rates than bank loans are faster economical development).

As can be seen from the temporary hierarchy of subjects adopted by Mr Mentzen – this is only a declarative "freedom“! However, despite any declaratory consequences and the degree of credibility it brings, although it does not catch the level with candidate Karol Nawrocki (who, however, Mr.Charles refused the attacks and won this match for political credibility on a abroad field), it beats the second remaining candidate on this level. Rafau aus Warschau von Berlin.

It is worth realizing, at least theoretically, the question of the last debate, if the over-reliable cognition and credibility of the proverbial 2 heads level Her Rafau von Platform.de-p. Mentzen would, however, go to the second circular to play this final game of the last debate, but no longer at his own but neutral stadium ... So what are these hypothetical chances of specified a debate launched by the Germans by their candidate?

p.s. but the final debate is 1 thing, and the issue of twisting or unlawful annulment of the election consequence by a diversionary group organized in PL by the BND/FSB/ABWerha is rather another matter... And to defy it. specified as this, but not declarative from Mr Mentzen, but classical poesy

You from your sleep lifting your temple, stand at the door of the bayonet for the gun! It takes blood!