The most crucial issues for Poland and for the full of Central Europe, and possibly for the world, stay global safety issues, including the problem of ending the war in Ukraine, in conjunction, of course, with another conflicts that we are already seeing in almost all corner of the world.
Globalization of War
The fresh decision of the U.S. legislature to proceed backing the Kiev government shows how related issues of overcoming Nazism in Ukraine and opposition to Zionism in Gaza. We may shortly be witnessing another possibly global conflict between superpowers, China and the United States in the South China Sea under the pretext of the Taiwanese issue. For we live in a phase The globalisation of war.
Wondering how to end the war in Ukraine, we are forced to admit that with the exception of the first fewer weeks, erstwhile at least the Russian side seemed to know the answer, now no 1 could say with a clear conscience that he had a solution ready. At the beginning of this hot phase of the conflict (which has lasted since 2014) the Russian plan most likely included leaving the Ukrainians themselves the right to decide about their government, so of course besides the right to make peace, conduct neutralisation and denazification on their own. This hope died with the failure of peace talks in Turkey, along with the Prime Minister's initiative Boris Johnson.who torpedoed all chance to enter into any, possibly equivalent peace between Kiev and Moscow. Since then, we may fear that Neither side knows how to end this war.
Ukraine as an object, not a organization to the conflict
In this case, only Russia and Western powers should be understood by the parties. Ukraine is only an object, a battlefield of this war between the West and Russia, fought only in Ukrainian territory. On the another hand, it can be assumed that the Russian side is now dominated by the tendencies of military resolution, thus gaining a clear military advantage, mastering more territories, breaking down further lines of defence (which is happening at the minute in front of our eyes one more time in the Cherkov and Kherson sections), and yet to gain a military and strategical position that will force Kiev to enter into peace, and at least to request at least a ceasefire, to enter into talks on conditions known from the very beginning of this conflict. They stay invariably denazification, neutralisation, restoration and guarantees of the rights of the Russian-speaking population and all national minorities (Let's emphasise: all National minorities, including Polish, Romanian, Hungarian, Bulgarian and another people surviving in Ukraine, are changing only the additional price that Kiev will gotta pay in territorial cavities (and possibly not only for Russia, but besides for its current theoretical allies). Are the Russian hopes for specified a solution correct? 1 thing we can say is that if Kiev were to decide, possibly specified a peace would already be concluded.
War like COVID
If the Ukrainians themselves had decided, any peace would have been concluded for certain and long ago Ukraine could have taken care of rebuilding the territory that would stay with it. However, decisions are not made in Kiev, but in the capitals of the West, Washington, London, including a dispersed centre of power of globalism, neo-imperialism and neoliberalism, which inactive dominates the modern end-of-day single-polar world, crushing in front of our eyes. The policy of this organization to the conflict with Russia is aimed clearly at continuing the war without a clear end. So we have a situation alive with 1984George Orwell, in which Oceania went smoothly from the war against East Asia to the clash with Eurasia and vice versa, as long as the conflict itself and its social consequences were eternal. Will this be the case in our case? Well, COVID besides seemed endless, but Russian tanks rapidly ended the pandemic fiction. So possibly this conflict will yet mature into any form of solstice.
I besides remember what I wrote on the day erstwhile this conflict entered the hot phase, that is, on February 24, 2022, erstwhile I called (of course in vain) for the authorities of the 3rd Republic to stay as far distant from this war as possible from its associated costs, as far as possible from the associated threats to the safety of Poland, further exacerbated by the conduct of suicidal irresponsible policies. I have unsuccessfully called for focus solely on the safety of the Polish number in Ukraine during the pacification period and, above all, on the safety of Poles surviving in Poland.
Hetmanate caricature pacification
By the way, erstwhile I mention pacification – self-proclaimed hunters of “all-present Russian agents” evidently give a imagination of how “rusophiles in Poland want fire and iron choke Ukrainian villages”. There is simply a classical transfer in these circles, due to the fact that they are so understood acts of panic were committed by the banders on the Polish Volyn and the full South-East Borders.. In the meantime, if we scope to the 19th century dictionaries, a beautiful word pacification, pacification – it simply meant to establish peace, the same is said by dictionaries of Orgelbrand from 1861, Arct from 1929 and Karlovich, Kryński and Niedźwiecki from 1900 to 1927. The pacific parliament was in the strategy of the Republic of nobility, this parliament which brought peace between the disputed parties to interior conflicts, civilian wars, frequently very heated disputes within the then political nation, and especially between states and the king. And in that sense, I keep my 2022 opinion: Let us want our Ukrainian friends (because I inactive consider myself a friend of the Ukrainians) pacification, to bring peace, so that they can in their own interest undertake reconstruction, and of course, so that they can happily go to their homes in this multimillion-dollar crowd, which found themselves as displaced people in Poland and another European countries.
Science for Poles?
Will we draw any conclusions from this conflict for the safety policy of the Polish state? Of course, the experience of these 2 years shows that we do not draw any conclusions, which should not surprise the alleged political elites. The political class of the Republic consists simply of traitors. These are people who are sold, who stay in the service of abroad centres. It is simply a abroad agentry, an enemy Poland Compradorian body, growth on the country and the Polish nation. Unfortunately, however, we besides see a problem with any immaturity of many environments that want to engage in politics, assuming at least that they do so for patriotic or patriotic reasons, but unfortunately inactive without knowing the surrounding reality and geopolitical processes in Poland and around Poland.
Of course, the foundation of Poland's safety (as well as any another Central European state) is to stay as far distant from the Ukrainian conflict as possible, and thus: end the full idiotic alleged aid for Kiev, which is not only counterproductive, due to the fact that it sustains unnecessary resistance, but is besides massively robbed, being subject to gigantic corruption, due to the fact that the bandero-oligarchy creation in Kiev is corrupted systematically and cannot be repaired from the inside another than simply getting free of all the clans, groups and sieves there, and of course the influences of Western capital and Western interviews that govern this Hetmanate parody.
Apart from this burning current issue, which saves billions of Polish gold and thousands of Ukrainian lives, the strategical question remains: what next? halt false aid And what??
First of all, sovereignty
Of course, it would be easier to look for theoretical answers to the perfect world, in which indeed the safety problem of Poland and Central Europe would be taken seriously, having a chance to find its political solution. For specified a perfect planet in the late 1990s, being a young author of the weekly Think Poland With our national-democratic political circle, we answered: neutrality. We proposed to build a collective safety strategy based on the OSCE. We then claimed that NATO, if it had to exist, if it had not dissolved after the end of the Cold War, then in order to be a real safety pact, should besides extend to Russia and possibly to China.
Of course it didn't. NATO remains only an aggressive centre of power and military force of Western imperialists, and neutrality has come down from the Polish and even European agenda in general. The window has moved far, far distant from her. In public discourse, not only Polish discourse, present is dominated by the cry that "neutrality is impossible in our part of Europe, that here you must always be on someone's side". The answer to these screams is rather simple: Why should it mean that we should be on the side of the enemies of Poland, the Nazis, the oligarchs, the globalists who keep Poland and the remainder of our part of Europe trapped in the mediate development?
Another answer, which we have gladly given and which we inactive consider, at least in part, to be current, remains Cooperation, regional cooperation. Unfortunately, however, the countries of Central Europe are effectively discouraged from it, paradoxically with the strengthening of empty propaganda, the various Tri-Murders and Inter-Murders. Yet, it was hard to find a better example of cooperation between European nations than Yugoslavia, which was badly destroyed: militaryly, violence, cultural cleansing, crime, secession and controlled primarily by Washington and Berlin of disintegration. It is hard to talk present about cooperation between European nations at a time erstwhile it is so clearly not in the hands of the centres of globalisation. Nevertheless, cooperation is surely a necessity, as the good examples we know from outside Europe, specified as the Organization of the Collective safety Agreement, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation or the BRICS initiative, show, not only in terms of geopolitics and security, but above all the economy.
All that was inactive within the scope of Poland and another countries of central Europe at the beginning or in the first decade of the 21st century – was again removed, pushed off the table for unilateral participation in Western aggression against Russia, as well as in the expected aggression of the West against China. Today, the first answer to what to do, how to guarantee the safety of Poland – remains the simplest answer: Poland's safety method is sovereignty.
Polish State alternatively of III Polish Republic
There can be no talk of Poland's safety without regaining control of the Polish economy, which is effectively only part of the economy of large Germany, without regaining control of government which is presently linked to the superiority of the law of the European superstate. Let us not be deceived that this is not the case. Law III of the Republic of Poland is subordinate to this Brussels elite, transnational, unnational, completely subordinate to the plans of planet neoliberal globalisation. Until we regain control of the borders, not only those with fences, stormed (as it is beautifully shown on TV) by refugees from the global South, but above all over the borders open to displaced people from Ukraine, before Ukrainian unfair competition towards the Polish economy – until we become a sovereign, new, real Polish state. Not the Compradorian, corrupt, neocolonial 3rd Republic, but the State of Poles. And without it there can be no question of any safety of our country, the safety of our nation, our families and loved ones.
Balance strength
Having regained sovereignty, it is only then that we can think of global cooperation with another sovereign actors, both in our immediate neighbourhood and around the world: with the large Belt and Road project, with the large BRICS project, with organisations that effort to supply common benefits to their members, not only to exploit them, as is the case with the European Union, not to mention NATO. In a word, it is only then, on the basis of equal agreements between sovereign states, that we can accomplish a safety situation, including neutrality. We do not request to argue in the conflict between the East and the West on either side. We should always and above all watch over Polish national interests. And in our interest in the future multipolar world, not so much the balance of power is desirable, but balance force.
And this point of balance can and should be independent, sovereign, neutral Poland.
Konrad Hand
Speech at the “Problems of European safety – how to avoid war?” conference in Warsaw, 27 April 2024 by the Center for Geostrategic Studies and Andrzej Lepper civilian Liberties Foundation.
