Nothing in this task was thought out from the beginning to the end in terms of political gains and losses, but one more time the nature of the Reefer won. What are you talking about? Rafal Trzaskowski gave an interview to Krzysztof Stanowski in the unprecedented form of “intelligence on departure”. Stanowski as a presidential candidate makes more or little successful electoral jokesBut he does business. As part of this business he conceived a series of interviews with all presidential candidates and the framework of this interview was identical, but for 2 cases.
The first is an “interview” with Maciej Maciak, which ended after a fewer minutes due to the fact that Stanowski returned to his worst practices of humiliating and mocking easy to humiliate and ridicule people. The second is an interview with Rafał Trzaskowski and here the difference was about submission to the stronger. Rafał Trzaskowski was the only 1 who did not agree to talk at the "Canal Zero", but during the debate in the "Superexpress" he invited Stanowski to himself, and he agreed. The exceptional treatment of Trzaskowski immediately met with a critical consequence on social networks, but the fact that Stanowski as a writer agreed to accept Trzaskowski's proposal is hard to hold a grudge and should alternatively be directed to the president of Warsaw and Vice-President of the Civic Platform.
Such an attitude was shown by the “Rafała” in its fullness, and he considered himself to be a unique candidate, to whom peculiar honours belong. Nor can it be excluded that Stanowski's consent amazed “Rafal”, in any case it is known that the interview took place and nothing else. Opinions from Stanowski's conversation with Trzaskowski last night are critical and come down to 1 word "borrow". Interestingly, the people who have watched this interview are burdening both presidential candidates with “borrowing”. It looked completely different. After Krzysztof Stanowski's interview with Karol Nawrocki, then the comments were even enthusiastic and even Nawrocki's opponents claimed that the "citizen candidate" went very well and Stanowski intelligently and interestingly conducted the conversation.
If you are tempted to indicate the reasons for the failure of the interview in Rafał Trzaskowski's apartment, 2 are immediately conspicuous. If the interviewer shows his superiority at the start, puts individual conditions and, above all, puts himself above another candidates, then an artificial and condescending atmosphere is created. Secondly, Krzysztof Stanowski "on the way out" surely did not feel as good as he feels at home, and this was evident, both in the withdrawn and in the insurance attitude and in method errors. It even occurred that any viewers accused Stanowski of letting the interview "out of the can", that is, previously recorded, but this allegation was completely unfounded and easy overturned. Worse, it was this thread that caused the most emotions, while the remainder of them were bored.
During the election campaign, you do quite a few things, 1 goes well another badly, which is simply a natural order of things. It is unnatural, however, erstwhile a politician himself does everything to ruin any run venture. Trzaskowski did precisely so, from the beginning to the end he led the subject of the interview badly and gained absolutely nothing, for that he lost a lot. The voters again saw the self-righteous “Rafal”, which must have greenhouse conditions to function as such, but besides in these conditions pale. Nor did Krzysztof Stanowski gain anything, who scored a second bad interview after the scandal with Maciej Maciak, at least that is the assessment of most viewers.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
