SW Reserch conducted a survey in which Poles were asked how they assessed the work of investigative committees. In the surveyed group, only 22 percent positively assessed the work of the committee, and 25.9 percent poorly. 28.3% of the respondents did not measure the work of the committee either well or badly, while 23.7 percent replied that they did not follow the work of these committees at all. Let us remind you that we have 3 committees in the Sejm: a "visa" chaired by Michael Szczerby“Pegasusowa” chaired by Magdalena Sroka and “kopertowa” chaired by Dariusz Joński.
Perhaps this strict evaluation of the committee's work is mostly related to the level of competence and intellectual possible of the heads of the committee, but it seems certain that Poles simply have adequate of a tacky political theatre. The consequence of all this is simply a deficiency of seriousness, present only a 4th of Poles take commissions seriously and there is no Jarosław Kaczyński in this group. Mr PiS president has decided to mock the committee, not for the first time, which could upset public opinion, but alternatively not so, since the public has committees in its deepest respect. Jarosław Kaczyński almost straight wrote that he has more crucial welds on his head and that in the committee gathering as a witness he cannot appear, and in addition, the fire oil was added by spokesperson Bochenek:
Today we have submitted a request to change the deadline for the proceeding of Prime Minister Jarosław Kaczyński before the Committee on Visa Affairs. Due to the ongoing run and the pre-planned calendar, in peculiar crucial meetings with citizens, the participation of Prime Minister JK in... pic.twitter.com/hpIR1n76Ks
— Rafał Bochenek (@RafalBochenek) June 3, 2024
The alleged visa scandal committee called on Kaczyński at 10 a.m. on Wednesday 5 June, but on that day the president will be staying or returning from Brussels, where he intends to talk to farmers about crucial matters. At this point it should be recalled that the committee is acting under the Criminal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure, and the second clearly states that an unjustified absence occurs erstwhile the court has not been informed at all why the witness did not appear. On the another hand, it is possible to justify an crucial individual or professional matter, but that is always judged by the court. It is so not that the presence of Jarosław Kaczyński is not justified, the justification to the committee has been sent and so the formal requirements have been met.
A completely different question is the assessment carried out by the body, whether, as president Kaczyński said, "member", and here there is no surprise. A associate in the position of president of the committee has already posted an entry on the portal "X", with a full package of threats, by the way:
Obietkosza, which is persistent non-statutory is contagious. There will be no change of deadline! The Commission will be waiting for Mr Kaczyński on Wednesday at 10 a.m. Unjustified absence will be punished. It is undefensible to translate yourself into the interest of the PiS party. The committee will consider the proposal... pic.twitter.com/VqtAs639W1
— Michał Szczerba (@MichaelSzeberba) June 3, 2024
First of all, specified a letter must be delivered effectively and even if it was sent today, it will arrive early tomorrow, and after all, next day the president will not be home due to the fact that he is going to Brussels. And it does not substance that the letter has been published, the definition of effective service of a procedural paper is completely different and speaks of individual service. An aviso is besides considered to be an effective service if, after 14 days, the addressee does not receive the consignment, the president can besides take a quiet journey and greet Mr Szczerba from Brussels.
In addition, in the alleged meantime, lawyers Mr President have the time to reflect on the content of the announcement to the D.A. with suspected violation of the law by the president Szczerba in connection with Article 128 k.p. 2:
All letters intended for participants in the proceedings shall be served in specified a way that the contents are not made available to persons.ed.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
