Deputy talker of the Sejm Krzysztof Bosak
If the PiS wants to have coalition capacity with anyone in Poland, it must halt this kind of depreciating and lying rhetoric.
Referring to Tobias Bocheński's statement:
1. The parties created by us, the people of the Confederacy, existed and represented the same program as they are now, BEFORE the Law and Justice were created in general, and Jarosław Kaczyński discovered that he would be the leader for right-wing voters, not centrienne ones (where in the center as a PC he lost to the UW).
Both conservative liberals (UPR) and nationalists (SN, ZChN) acted in Polish politics before 2001 (the emergence of PiS) and effectively competed with Kaczyński's erstwhile projects (e.g. ZChN from PC in AWS times). Mr. Tobias is young, so he may not remember. Or not really know that, for example, the nationalist wrote the Solidarity Statute.
I myself first joined the national political organization before the PiS was created. We have many people with experience and longer political biography. In turn, any of the younger politicians of the Law and Justice Service began with us or in the UPR, but they lacked patience and constancy.
2. It's not actual we didn't rule.. First, any of us were in the PiS coalition. The first and second government of the Law and Justice (2005 and 2006) would not have been created without a coalition with populists from Self-defense and with us, Eurosceptics from the LPR. We know the kind of action of the leaders and politicians of the Law and Justice Union, including all the dark sides of politics. That's why we're so careful with them. I would hazard saying that we know him better than Tobias Bocheński, who knows PiS mainly by the character of Prof. Bigniew Raua, who is not a typical writer.
In addition, we have people who participated in the regulation of Poland during the earlier “right” period (post-solidarity parties in the 1990s). Their experience, as well as a large deal of criticism about what they saw, later passed on to us. Today, in turn, we are approached by people who were in the administration and companies of the handout of the Law and Justice. We approach them very carefully, but we don't regulation anyone out. We perceive to their experiences and draw conclusions.
We besides have people who have experience in exercising authority at the local government level and in managing their companies. We most likely have the highest percent of entrepreneurs on the Polish political scene among the staff.
If the PiS wants to have coalition capacity with anyone in Poland, it must halt this kind of depreciating and lying rhetoric. Referring to the message @TABochenski 1 step at a time:
1. Parties created by us, people with @CONFEDERATION_, existed and represented the same program... https://t.co/XEXXGeBtTY
3. I think the most crucial thing is: PiS and Confederacy are camps of different ideas and programs. These are not insignificant differences, but fundamental.
By simplifying: PiS is simply a neosanction, mutation of PPS tradition with conservative-chadek phraseology. In turn Confederation is simply a national-freedom alliance, thus continuing the tradition of national democracy and conservative liberalism.
Furthermore, PiS was, is and will most likely be pro-EU, and we are, on the contrary. For 20 years we have been practically different on all crucial issue related to the European Union, too the issue of the migration pact (where the Law and Justice Government had previously opened Polish borders to mass legal immigration under national law).
There is no relation between etatism and marketplace economical policy.
There is no link between EU centralism (Lisbon Treaty) and the sovereignty approach.
There is no link between the climate of EU opportunisticism (acceptance of EZŁ and FF55) and our unchangeable opposition to the disindustrialisation of Poland.
There is no relation between fiscal Eurocentralism (euro-debt, Euro-tax, KPO) and our sovereign fiscal conservatism.
Finally, there is no relation between the pettyness, the inconspicuousness and the opportunisticness of many of the main leaders of the Law and Justice on the issue of progressiveism, and our clearly conservative, offensive approach.
We don't want to be like our opponents.. Our chances are that people will see the difference and positively measure it, not confuse us with mainstream politicians and accidentally elect us for power.
In conclusion, we are rivals. The differences were and will be very significant. Let's be honest with the voters. We have different programs and different state readings.
Support Sławomir Mentzen.
Mentzen2025 tour. gathering information: Fb/SlawomirMentzen and == sync, corrected by elderman ==.
Entry The PiS? We're rivals. Let's be honest with the voters. pochodzi z serwisu Confederation.
