Ancient chroniclers did a much harder occupation than Contemporary descriptions of reality and fiction. Historical recording techniques did not let free editing, so each word required effort, skill and cost a lot. This does not mean, however, that in the past there was not what we call "peaks". The books evidence many stories that have never happened and usually were not mistakes in art, but intended “Heiters”.
One specified tale, having nothing to do with the truth, dates back to October 1789. At the exact time in France, the French revolution, or bloody slaughter, was ongoing, cutting off bourgeois heads with guillotine, which was driven by the anger of the people. In these dramatic circumstances before Versailles, an agitated crowd would gather to shout out to Louis XVI and his wife Maria Antonina his hurt and suffering! “We have no bread! We have no bread!' – citizens reported specified a major complaint by the royal couple, and this was to be the beginning of a culinary fantasy that is inactive going around the planet present and is considered an authentic event.
Maria Antonina was to answer the anger and supplication of her subordinates: “But let them eat cookies!” This is not the only version of the expected repost of the Queen of France in another variant there are brooches, and French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau has distributed another cakes:
Finally, I remembered the way of a certain princess, who heard complaints that peasants had no bread, replied, “Why don’t they eat biscuits?”
The point is that this evidence dates back to 1770, 19 years before the revolution. Rousseau is improbable to compose about Maria Antoinette, but his words were inactive utilized against her. This was due to the fact that it was only after the death of the philosopher that his works began mass publishing, and this coincided with the outbreak of the revolution. And no 1 cares about no evidence.that Maria Antonina did indeed treat the people in specified a realistic and cynical way. For sure, many centuries earlier, in China, Emperor Hui said: “If the hungry do not have grain, they should eat the meat. It will besides fill their stomachs – why starve?”
The solution to the riddle of the false attribution of Maria Antonina's words most likely involves the fact that the French hated the Habsburgs, and that celebrated Austrian household was the Queen. Secondly, erstwhile political emotions dominate, fact ceases to have any meaning, it only matters to beat the enemy and attribute to it the worst qualities. Maria Antonina, like the full Habsburg family, did not sin empathize, but made an absolute effort to keep power and so did not enjoy the love of her subjects. This does not mean, however, that she spoke in the absurd way that she was attributed to her.
In modern Poland, however, we cannot have any uncertainty that the “minister” Paulina Hennig-Kloska is an authentic Maria Antonina, or, in fact, the words are authentic:
From what I've seen, it's mostly not the things you need, but alternatively the things you can do without sometimes. Climate textiles are even good if we buy little of these things, due to the fact that that is what causes emissions
This was the diagnosis given by the ‘minister’ on Polsat News, commenting on the alarming decline in retail sales. The words “ministery” were not written by Gall Anonym on parchment, but carry all media and the net in the first version. This is how Paulina Hennig-Kloska became Polish Maria Antonina and only 1 question is in the air. When the angry people approach government buildings, where the Polish Louis XVI sits and if a head falls for specified a policy practice, but the head of “Czeslaw”?
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!