The Ordo Iuris Institute announces an crucial triumph in an exceptional case that has not yet been in the 11-year past of Ordo Iuris. Well, a fewer days ago, the court issued an crucial precedent ruling on the defence of life from the minute of conception in connection with immoral in vitro procedures.
Through the engagement of lawyers, Ordo Iuris managed to defend the right to life of a circumstantial child, frozen as an embryo under an in vitro procedure. Discussing this victory, the paper “Rzeczpospolita” wrote about the Court's giving precedence to “the right to life and to birth by the mother”. The paper besides quoted Mr Paul Szafrant of Ordo Iuris, who expressed satisfaction with the “confirmation of the subjectivity of man from the minute of his conception.”
As the OI recalls, among the many consequences of utilizing an unethical in vitro procedure is the freezing of hundreds of thousands or even millions of conceived children. Until recently, they seemed to have almost no rights. The current ruling goes against this criminal practice.
As a consequence of the judicial victory, Mrs. Agnes' kid will be able to come into the world, brought to life and frozen in a procedure. in vitro. Born from in vitro fertilization, our hero's sister is 9 years old, but her brother (or possibly sister) has inactive not been given a chance to develop, birth and experience motherly love. Unfortunately, the child's parents' matrimony fell apart. Mrs. Agnieszka's ex-husband, who extorted his wife's consent to divorce, promising that he would let a frozen kid to be born, failed to keep his word and tried at all costs to halt the birth of an already-established child. In breach of his wife's agreement, he demanded that the kid be "distilled" or given up for anonymous adoption.
Mom could not accept it, so she turned to Ordo Iuris believing that she would receive effective support in the fight for the right to life for her child.
On behalf of Mrs. Agnes, the Institute went to court. The ex-husband then confessed that he had signed a deal only to get a divorce, but never intended to keep it. The man argued that the deficiency of his consent was due to the alleged concern for... the welfare of a kid who would be raised in a single family. In turn, lawyers argued that, according to discipline and Polish law, human life begins with conception and so the frozen kid is entitled to birth. They cited, among another things, the judgement of the Constitutional Court of 18 April 2018 stating that the embryo has a right to life and cannot be treated in the matter. In settling the case, the Radom territory Court recognized the right position of Ordo Iuris.
In order for this precedent to have a wide impact on the case law of Polish courts and confirmation that the protection of life begins at the time of conception, The Ordo Iuris Institute published an extended analysis of the ruling.
Left-wing media were besides interested. Although "High Aliens" are outraged at the fact that the court allowed a female to decide to have her kid against his father's will. It's truly amazing and interesting. If the parent was going to kill the child, the same paper would argue that the man had no voice in the matter... For left-wing ideologists, the only value is unlimited contempt for conceived life, and the rights of mothers or fathers are treated only instrumentally.
Therefore, in a ruling confirming that a kid conceived in vitro and frozen in liquid nitrogen is entitled to life, to birth and to motherly love, it is worth noticing a insignificant triumph of life civilization over the civilization of death.
Source: Ordo Iuris Institute
What does the Church say about “in vitro”? 6 facts that should know Kosiniak-Kamish and Holovnia
What is truly in vitro? See the fresh movie Life and household Center
Eugenics of the 21st century. In vitro clinic offers “breeding” only healthy children
