“People who may inactive have a spark of humanity, of human feelings, remember! Hear my cry, the cry of a grey man, the boy of a nation, who loved his own and another people's freedom above all else, above your own life, remember! It is not besides late!” – as Richard Siwiec, an amateur thinker, a patriot and a staunch anti-communist who treated the strategy in Peerel as the worst anti-humanist evil.
On September 8, 1968, during the state harvest ceremonies, people were fleeing from a man who set himself on fire at the grandstand of the ten-year-old stadium not existing today. In specified a place that he matured from his place the stetric leader of the People's Poland, Władysław Gomulka. He was a postgraduate of the University of Jan Kazimierz in Lviv, Ryszard Siwiec.
Siwiec was incapable to reconcile with the communist invasion of Czechoslovakia. His dramatic protest – there is most likely no more extremist form than self-burning – was straight triggered by the suppression of the Prague Spring besides by the Peerel troops. However, the résumé, the values professed – all this indicates that the request for extremist protest against the inhuman strategy has been expanding in Ryszard Siwiec for a long time.
Of course, people did not find out about Siewec and his protest from state media. specified things were not reported by national radio and television. Witnesses testified that they were incapable to hear the general sound of his screams – Siwiec, burning, shouting something. In contrast to the self-incineration in Czechoslovakia of student Jan Palach, Siwiec's death (in infirmary after 4 days, in full isolation provided by SB) did not trigger any consequence in Poland. People learned about Siwiec's motives only from the abroad radio – those who listened to them.
What does Richard Siwiec and his final motion of protest against dictatorship with hooligans who, with their brainwashed, have utmost fanaticism, hinder people's lives by claiming that the "planet burns"? Absolutely nothing. And yet there was a justice in Poland who felt that they could be compared to Ryszard Siwce. And this must be seen as a evidence to the collapse of the intellectual and intellectual parts of the judiciary, and this peculiar justice in particular. And that is said as mildly as possible. If you wanted to say more, you would gotta usage words specified as “cretin” or “idiot”. And I believe that they would be entirely justified here.
The conviction that the O.R. hooliganeries praised is prescriptive. Unfortunately, we don't know the name of the justice who turned him in. The activists were sentenced to reprimand – that's all. The justification is actually a praiseworthy anthem about them. We read:
"The above alleged actions of the Court of First Instance were a form of civilian disobedience, which served to show to the public the values of those closest to them (in the case, it was an outrage against the abuse of air transport – private aircraft generating very advanced CO2 emissions in relation to the number of people travelling them, including the stars of music), which translates into lower social harm than in the case of traffic blocking by, for example, incorrect parking.
The fact that the problem signaled by the accused people has a real impact on the lives of citizens can be evidenced by even the last flood in the south of Poland, the consequences of which on the day of the nin judgement are inactive affecting thousands of people, and millions in the world.
In 1968 another Polish citizen, Ryszard Siwiec, wanted to scope the social community by self-incineration, in order to awaken it, in a different way than protecting the environment, the sphere of our lives. Today, this individual is simply a hero for many, and it may turn out in the future that specified heroes will be blamed."
The justification gives the impression that it is an inept publicist text from “Political Critics” or “Gazeta Wyborcza”. The author even has problems formulating logical sentences, due to the fact that the second paragraph shows that floods in Poland affect millions of people around the world. This paragraph besides raises objections for another reason – what analysis did the justice make so clearly that the flood was a consequence of climate change, in addition to man-made, due to the fact that that is the sense and justification of the excess of the OPs? With large probability – none. And I would remind you that the IPCC study of 2021 (Chapter 12) even pointed to the absence of specified a relationship.
It is besides worth asking, how does the court specify "abuse" of air transport? According to the judge, what ratio of emissions from the aircraft to passenger numbers would be justified and not justified?
The judgement is besides shocking due to the fact that it does not take into account the quantifiable effects of the RDP. Whether we're talking about Taylor Swift's performance or people going to work or home on a street blocked by an activist, it always means financial losses, nerves of victims of hooliganry, delays with possible negative consequences for many people. specified consequences of the blockades conducted by Just halt Oil in the UK caused that the court there alternatively of talking – like a court in Poland – about the heroism of climate terrorists decided to put them in jail for longer. The leader of the four-day blockades of the London bypass, 58-year-old Roger Hallam, received in July 5 years, the remaining 4 people – 4 years each. There is simply a striking contrast between how courts in Britain and Germany began to treat climateists and how they were treated by the Polish court.
The court seems to give the activists the green light by its ruling, recognising that in the name of their obsessions they can lead illegal protests and radically impede others' lives. It strengthens the sense of impunity of people who openly announce that they will proceed to break the law. I presume that the court was intellectually besides weak to realize that by ruling in this way it simultaneously signals to the victims of climatic fanaticism that the state is not on their side. The consequences are not hard to predict: citizens treated in this way will become convinced that if the state, including courts, guarantees the impunity of the hooliganism that has decided to poison their lives, the only solution is to take matters into their own hands. specified situations occurred in modern Poland, and checking the course of events almost always led to the conclusion that the first origin of later tragedy was to turn the state distant from people.
Finally, he peculiarly resents the comparison of the climatic rabble to Ryszard Siwiec. It doesn't add up. Neither Siwiec's action was a manifestation of civilian disobedience, nor was it the action of climateists. Citizen disobedience, for example, would be a failure to pay taxes, an act that does not straight harm anyone, but which threatens serious consequences. Richard Siwiec, carefully planning his protest, took care not to harm anyone. He didn't detonate a ten-year bomb at the Stadium. He didn't drag another lives with him. But Siwiec himself suffered the top sacrifice. Climateists, on the contrary: in no way do they harm themselves, due to the fact that as blue birds they can focus on obstructing people's lives. They don't have any obligations, due to the fact that they don't. It's bad for another people. This alone shows how highly inappropriate the comparison utilized by the court is.
But that is not the end. Ryszard Siwiec protested against the inhuman strategy and invasion of russian and Polish troops into Czechoslovakia in order to suppress the revolt against the deficiency of freedom. It was a protest based on its deepest grounds on knowing the contradiction of communism with human nature. On a thorough knowing of the essence of humanism.
Climateists have people for nothing, and 1 of the demands of the climate movement is degrowth, besides understood as reducing the number of people who harm climate and the planet. Climateists not only do not protest against any oppression, but on the contrary: they themselves are in favour of murderism and coercion, justified fighting for climate. Not only are they not the successors of Siwiec or Palacha, but they are actually on the perfect side of those against whom Siwiec and Palach protested.
In Poland, the precedent law does not work successfully, and 1 ruling can be isolated. Nevertheless, its destructive character does not rise doubt, as does the radically low intellectual level of its author.
Luke Warches
![[MC DATA] Experts sound the alarm. The vast majority of Poles do not yet have a PESEL number withheld](https://dzienniknarodowy.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dowod_osobisty_c_mondaynews_pl.jpg?v=1751964025)
