I think it's certain that more debates, at least before the first round, will be gone. And there were, this time, adequate and anyone who likes this kind of political presentation of competitors should be satisfied. This last one, carried out by TVP in liquidation, was, however, in its own way circumstantial and distinguishing from earlier ones, even though this time, there is simply a decently established main pair of competitors and fewer doubts that Karol Nawrocki and Rafał Trzaskowski will meet in the second round.
What was their confrontation during this debate? Nawrocki was in a worse situation and for 2 reasons; the first was the burden of the affair concerning the studio in Gdańsk, and the second was the fact that the debate was organised by TVP, which can be suspected of various things, but not that it could favour Nawrock. However, to any surprise, I must measure that this situation did not depress Karol Nawrocki to the least extent, and in a clash with Trzaskowski, he rapidly took the initiative and proceeded to the attacks which his opponent was poorly coping with. Nawrocki was clearly in good shape, spoke decisively and boldly, and his upright attitude and unforced grin presented assurance and the desire to impose his position on the opponent.
Unlike him, Rafał Trzaskowski looked tired, tense and poorly responsive to his opponent's attacks. possibly this was the consequence of Karol Nawrocki's erstwhile boxing practice and is mentally accustomed to the fact that regardless of the punches he received, he should be aggressively sought to defeat his opponent. specified a practice does not be in Trzaskowski, who seems to have been utilized to working in greenhouse conditions, in a friendly environment that only admired him. This difference is now coming out and it can be seen that Trzaskowski is not doing well in hard circumstances, which in many people may give emergence to doubts about how he will respond in crisis situations, which can happen during the highest office in Poland.
As for the another participants in the debate, it seems that they are now pursuing another goals, which are no longer a fight for winning the presidential election. For example, it can be assumed that Marshal Holovnia is now seeking his position in the ruling coalition and getting him a 4th place in the current election, which is real, can aid him. For this reason, Adrian Zandberg appears to be a bigger competitor to him, who has the possible to outrun him. On the another hand, Mrs Magdalena Biejat and Mrs Zandberg, who would most likely like to outrun Biejat, are besides facing the left, which would have been for him to play back on her for having erstwhile left his organization and passed into a coalition forming the current government. Sławomir Mentzen, who seems to have come to terms with the fact that he will not enter the second circular and so behave little confrontationally, made his message more calm and focused on coherent reasoning.
An highly interesting and possibly even the most noted subject in this debate was the confrontation between Krzysztof Stanowski, and the leading debate by Dorothy Wysocka-Schnepf. The leading individual is known for his firm liberal-left beliefs and poorly hidden antipathy against certain candidates. I was amazed to hear the question she had prepared, which contained the thesis that restoring a legal abortion could ... increase the birth rate of children. I'm afraid to hear what she might have ideas about reducing alcoholism or prostitution. due to this kind of committed attitude, the delegation to direct the debate has been protested by many committees. Since TVP did not change the lead, Stanowski expressed his discontent, who called Wysocka-Schnepf “the archicaplan of propaganda” and attacked, referring to her household relationships: “This is not the first time in past erstwhile individual named Schnepf interrogates Poles.”
This clash between Stanowski and Wysocka-Schnepf had a different context, namely it was besides a clash of fresh and old media; those utilizing network technologies and YouTube, like the Zero Stanowski Canal, and the large tv moles from another era, which is inactive TVP, although in liquidation. Despite their modest size and means, these fresh media are able to gain coverage akin to large tv stations. This can be compared to what happened during the last war in Ukraine, where a inexpensive $100 drone is able to destruct a million-dollar tank. In a akin way, the power of large television, which began about 70 years ago, goes back into the past. Sic transit gloria mundi – so the world's glory passes away.
Stanisław Lewicki
