In Poland, DEI inactive did not make it so bad, so not even everyone knows what is going on. A fewer more years and the reigning europaci The EU would have introduced this to us and we would have found out painfully how it works, and then it could be besides late. The withdrawal of the U.S. from the guided ideology of DEI policy gives us a chance to return to common sense.
DEI - Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, i.e. allegedly Diversity, Equality and Integration. In practice, this means the exact other of the declaration, i.e. the fresh form of discrimination, and the complete elimination of the inclusion of merit and skills in employment and promotion.
In short, the DEI policy means that due to the fact that any social groups are or have been discriminated against in the past, they should now be promoted. That's why Claudine Gay, for example, became president of Harvard University. Not due to technological merit or management skills, just due to the fact that she's a black female and a lesbian. Others were better, but did not have those preferred qualities. Likewise, the head of the California Fire Department. I wrote about it in a fewer places.
I place here entirely only the basic legal act ending DEI:
TERMINATION OF ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATION AND RETURN OF OPPORTUNITIES BASED ON RESULTS
The 2 listed below as well as all the others can be read on the website https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/
Completion of extremist and waste government DEI programmes and preferences
and
Reform the national employment process and reconstruct the importance of merit in government service
RECOGNITION OF ILLEGAL DISCRIMINATION AND RETURN OF OPPORTUNITIES BASED ON RESULTS
Under the powers vested in me as president by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered:
Section 1. Long-term national civilian rights defend individual Americans from discrimination on the grounds of race, colour, religion, sex or national origin. These civilian rights safeguards form the basis for equal opportunities for all Americans. As president, I have a solemn work to guarantee that these rights are enforced for the benefit of all Americans.
However, today, about 60 years after the passing of the civilian Rights Act of 1964, key and influential institutions of the American public, including the national government, large corporations, financial institutions, medical industry, large commercial airlines, law enforcement agencies and higher education institutions have actively adopted and exploited dangerous, degrading and immoral racial and gender-based preferences under the terms of the alleged "diversity, equality and integration" (DEI) or "diversity, equality, integration and accessibility" (DEIA), which may violate the civilian rights of this nation.
The illegal rules of the DEI and the DEIA not only violate the text and spirit of our long-standing national civilian rights, but besides undermine our national unity due to the fact that they deny, discredit and undermine the conventional American values of hard work, excellence and individual achievements for an illegal, destructive and destructive strategy of identity-based loot. Industrious Americans who deserve a chance to fulfill the American dream should not be stigmatized, humiliated or deprived of opportunities due to race or gender.
These illegal DEI and DEIA rules besides endanger the safety of American men, women and children throughout the country, detracting from the importance of individual merits, capabilities, hard work and determination in selecting people to work and services in key sectors of American society, including at all levels of government and in medical, aviation and law enforcement communities. However, in the event of a tragic case, the Americans were first-hand witnesses of the disastrous effects of illegal, destructive discrimination, which prioritised the way people were born alternatively of what they were capable of.
The national government is obliged to enforce our civilian rights. The intent of this provision is to guarantee that it does so by ending illegal preferences and discrimination.
Section 2. Politics. The policy of the United States is to defend the civilian rights of all Americans and to advance an individual initiative, excellence and hard work. I so order all executive departments and agencies (agency) to end all discriminatory and illegal preferences, mandates, policies, programmes, actions, guidelines, rules, enforcement actions, consent orders and requirements. In addition, I order all agencies to enforce our long-standing civilian rights and to combat illegal preferences of the DEI, mandates, policies, programmes and actions of the private sector.
Section 3. End of illegal discrimination in the national government. (a) The following implementing measures are hereby repealed:
(i) Implementing Regulation 12898 of 11 February 1994. (Federal action to address environmental justice in number and low income populations);
(ii) Implementing Regulation 13583 of 18 August 2011. ( Establishing a coordinated government initiative to advance diversity and integration into the national workforce;
(iii) Implementing Regulation 13672 of 21 July 2014. (further amendments to Implementing Regulation 11478, Equal employment opportunities in the national government and Implementing Regulation 11246, Equal employment opportunities); and
(iv) Presidential Memorandum of 5 October 2016 (Promoting diversity and integration into the national safety workforce).
(b) The national contract process will be streamlined to increase velocity and efficiency, reduce costs and requirements from national contractors and subcontractors to respect our civilian rights. Consequently:
(i) Implementing Regulation 11246 of 24 September 1965 (Equal employment opportunities) is hereby repealed. For 90 days from the date of that order, national contractors may proceed to comply with the provisions in force from 20 January 2025.
(ii) The Bureau of Compliance Programmes in the Department of Labour will immediately cease:
(A) advance "diversity";
(B) to make national contractors and subcontractors liable for taking ‘firmative actions’; and
(C) to let or encourage national contractors and subcontractors to engage in balancing the workforce on the basis of race, skin color, gender, sexual preferences, religion or national origin.
(iii) In accordance with Implementing Regulation 13279 of 12 December 2002. (Equal protection of rights for organisations based on religion and community), employment practices, contracts and contracts of national contractors and subcontractors will not take into account race, skin color, gender, sexual preferences, religion or national origin in a way that violates the nation's civilian rights.
(iv) The Head of each agency must include in each contract or grant:
(A) A condition requiring a contractual counterparty or recipient of a grant of consent that its compliance in all respect with all applicable national anti-discrimination rules is essential for government payment decisions for the purposes of Section 3729(b)(4) of Title 31 of the United States Code; and
(B) A condition requiring specified a counterparty or recipient to certify that it does not conduct any DEI-promoting programmes that infringe any applicable national anti-discrimination legislation.
(c) The manager of the Management and Budget Office (OMB), with the assistance of the lawyer General on request, shall be obliged to:
(i) Review and review, where appropriate, all processes, directives and guidelines in force throughout the government;
(ii) References to DEI and DEIA rules in excise duty, whatever their name, to national procurement procedures, contracts, grants and financial assistance to improve these procedures, increase velocity and efficiency, reduce costs and comply with civilian rights rules; and
(iii) Complete any "diversity", "equality", "fair decision-making", "fair distribution of financial and method assistance", "development of equality" and akin mandates, requirements, programmes or actions, where appropriate.
Sec. 4. Encourage the private sector to end illegal discrimination against DEI and preferences. (a) The heads of all agencies, with the support of the lawyer General, shall take all appropriate measures with respect to the activities of their agencies in order to advance in the private sector the policies of the individual initiative, excellence and hard work set out in Section 2 of this Regulation.
(b) To keep me informed and advised so that my Administration can formulate a appropriate and effective civilian rights policy, The lawyer General, within 120 days of this order, shall, in consultation with the heads of the applicable agencies and in cooperation with the manager of the OMB, present to the Assistant president for National Policy a study containing recommendations on the enforcement of national civilian rights and on another appropriate measures to encourage the private sector to end illegal discrimination and preferences, including DEI. The study will include a proposed strategical enforcement plan identifying:
(i) Key sectors of concern within the jurisdiction of each agency;
(ii) The most blatant and discriminatory DEI practices in any sector of concern;
(iii) A plan of concrete steps or measures to halt DEI programmes or principles (whether specifically defined as ‘DEI’ or otherwise), which constitute illegal discrimination or preferences. Under this plan, each agency will identify 9 possible investigations into the compatibility of civilian public companies, large corporations or non-profit associations, foundations with assets worth $500 million or more, state and local bar and medical associations and higher education institutions with trust funds exceeding $1 billion;
(iv) another policies encouraging the private sector to end illegal discrimination and DEI preferences and to respect all national civilian rights;
(v) litigation that would possibly be suitable for national lawsuits, interventions or statements of interest; and
(vi) possible regulatory actions and sub-regulatory guidelines.
Section 5. another activities. Within 120 days of this order, the Attorney-General and the Secretary-General of Education shall jointly issue guidance to all state and local educational agencies that receive national funds, as well as to all higher education institutions that receive national grants or participate in a national financial assistance program for students under Title IV of the Law on Higher Education, 20 USC 1070 et seq., concerning the measures and practices required to comply with Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. president and Fellows of Harvard College, 600 US 181 (2023).
Sec. 6. Split. If any provision of this order or application of any provision to any individual or condition is declared invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its provisions to any another individual or condition shall not be affected by it.
Sec. 7. Scope. (a) This Regulation shall not apply to lawful employment preferences and contracts in the national or private sector for US Armed Forces veterans or persons protected by Randolph-Sheppard Act, 20 USC 107 and subsequent.
(b) This Regulation shall not prevent state or local governments, national counterparties or federally funded state and local education agencies or higher education institutions from engaging in statements protected by the First Amendment.
(c) This provision does not prohibit teaching persons in federal-funded higher education institutions within the broader academic curriculum from advocating, supporting or promoting illegal employment practices or concluding contracts prohibited by this Regulation.
Section 8. General provisions. (a) Nothing in this provision shall be construed as affecting or otherwise affecting:
(i) powers conferred by law on the executive department, the agency or its manager; or
(ii) the functions of the manager of the Management and Budget Office on budgetary, administrative or legislative proposals.
(b) This Regulation will be implemented in accordance with applicable law and subject to the availability of resources.
(c) This Regulation is not intended and shall not make any right or advantage, material or procedural, enforceable under law or within the framework of justice by any organization against the United States, its departments, agencies or entities, their officers, employees or agents or any another person.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
21 January 2025
