The Tuska Coalition wants to regulation as hard as Kaczyński

Krzysztof Bosak: Contrary to appearances, the current systemic-legal conflict is very simple to understand:
The Tusk Coalition wants to regulation as hard as Kaczyński, but does not have the same democratic mandate. They have parliament, but they don't have a president. Hence the aversion to statutory changes (the hazard of veto!), and alternatively the search for legal loopholes and the bending and breaking of laws in the hope that any court and abroad court will pin it.

How should it be? The current rulers should focus on what they control legally (where are the changes in the most crucial state-owned companies?). In another matters, usually negociate with the President, and with what the president blocks waiting for the 2025 presidential election and talking to the next President. That would be a constitutional and law-abiding approach.

Contrary to appearances, the current systemic-legal conflict is very simple to understand: The Tusk Coalition wants to regulation as hard as Kaczyński, but does not have the same democratic mandate. They have parliament, but they don't have a president. Hence aversion to statutory changes (risk...

The current approach, based on the control of parliament and strength ministries, consisting of legal creativity and forceful occupying of buildings and taking over institutions, is simply a course for state chaos, inertia and deterioration of its position. And in the worst case scenario, besides to further exacerbate the political conflict — due to the fact that sooner or later, individual will forcefully pursuit usurpers and start a spiral of violence.
We don't want that!