Hands: The Shots of Walus

Two shots to the neck, 2 shots to the head. classical execution. Thus, on April 10, 1993, Janusz Walus killed Chris Hani.

Arrested drinking beer with police officers, he felt relaxed (in his opinion under the influence of drug-induced beer) and said that he had convinced him to execution Clive Derby-Lewis, an influential Conservative organization politician who lent him the weapon utilized in the assassination. No 1 else was active in the case, no conspiracy. Another single shooter with a helpful colleague equipped with a Vekera Z88 9 mm caliber.

Single shooter?

It is characteristic that outside Poland nobody someway believed Janusz Walusi, and after 31 years of shooting at Dawn Park in Boksburg, no 1 believed in him. However, the Pole did not rat anyone out, by the Committee on fact and Reconciliation he continued to insist that he acted alone, served more than 29 years (of which six after the court's release order) inactive without changing his version. possibly that's why he survived.

In Poland, the communicative of a countryman whose only motive was perfect anti-communism makes a good impression in circles raised on the Cult of Cursed Soldiers / the steadfast, so no 1 even bothers the returning hero. Also, Walus' opponents are not very inquisitive, and even if they propose a larger plot, of course it is far right, most likely involving officials of the outgoing government apartheid, the enemies there of a thick line and the construction of a South African liberal democracy. In a word and welcoming Janusz Walusz on Okęcie, and those who greet with specified an outrage apply Polish cripples to events from the another end of the world, as if in South Africa the tenth generation of AK fought the twelfth generation of Komintern.

He sentenced South Africa to neoliberal globalisation

However, even in Poland it is not so simple, let alone talk about the past of the country, which during the period erstwhile everyone was emotional about Walus' process, exploded to economical growth, so far limited by global sanctions. How to exploit the large wealth of South Africa: whether by redistributing gross from them, creating a truly diverse interior market, based on a strong labour marketplace and the inevitable recovery of the function of a macro-regional leader – or by full beginning up to global capital, by implementing the global Monetary Fund programmes, speeding up privatisation, freeing workers' rights by playing an immigrant card, by putting South Africa on the Central European path. This was the dimension of Walus' shots, which did not so much "defence South Africa from communism", but alternatively condemned globalist neoliberalism.

Who did?

If it was to destruct a bloody warlord, a black man with a red palate, a knife in his teeth and a stock of tire necklaces – why not shoot Joe Modise, leaders of the UMkhonto weSizwe, militants of the African National Congress, to whom many, among others, Chris Hani accused corruption, comfortable life in exile and dirty interests in bordering relations with guerrilla armies of neighboring countries and secret services, not only from Africa? Another AKN leader criticized by Hani, Thabo MbekiThanks to Walus' shots, he could become the curator of a pro-globalist course alongside a decently frightened murder. Nelson Mandelaand then his successor.

He raised these points before the Committee on fact and Reconciliation Terry Crawford-Browne, erstwhile banker, close associate of the Archbishop Desmond Tutu, which revealed the biggest scandal in South Africa's post-Apartheid history, famed The strategical Defence Package, commonly known the Arms Deal Scandal. Crawford-Browne not only recreated the mechanics of driving specified a powerful economy as the South African into a debt spiral through military contracts, for which gigantic bribes were taken by leading AKN politicians, including in peculiar Modise, Mbeki and another president, Jacob Zuma, people who wouldn't have come to power if it wasn't for Hani's death. By testifying as a witness, and then publishing his statements, Crawford-Browne pointed out Modise and Mbeki as likely conspirators, or at least execution inspirers. It was yet Crawford-Brown who raised the function of 1 more center, the Zionist business of Palestine first in circumventing sanctions against apartheid, followed by financing a circumstantial transformation towards a liberal democracy and a globalist financial system. Tel Aviv's engagement would have allowed us to realize why white anti-communists were utilized for execution in the interests of black bribers. After all, their leaders were already preparing to make money in fresh times, and the Zionists were old adequate to make money in intermediation. However, all these threads were not studied due to the fact that Walus and Derby-Lewis acted alone. That's what they said.

Who lost?

The paradox is that the opponents of the direction of change, which for many years made South Africa a origin of profit for global capital and corrupt politicians, were both conservative Africans, attached to Calvinist paternalism and strict ethics of old South Africa, as well as black left-wing radicals, seeking to defend the South African planet of work. Hani's death deprived them of their leader, and of the former, she made partners to murder.

And those who always win have won.

Konrad Hand