When police officers are ordered to usage direct force..

Deputy Marshal Krzysztof Bosak, commenting on the case of a farmer who was tried for violating the integrity of police officers, wrote about the ways officers act erstwhile they were ordered to usage direct coercion.

If officers are ordered to usage direct coercion, they almost always accompany this detention. Information about the number of detainees serves to justify the usage of s.p.b. in information services and during the following day of the press conference.

If officers are ordered to usage direct coercion, they are almost always accompanied by this detention. Information about the number of detainees serves to justify the usage of s.p.b. in information services and during the following day of the press conference.... https://t.co/cVIESsACqT

Officers who are to make detention do not like to run and struggle, so those who do not escape are stopped (a sense of safety is simply a bad advisor). Then The detainees mostly get the charges. The police notes underlying them are written post factum, according to the agenda and without connection with the detainee (except for his particulars written from the document), but the court will not announcement this due to the fact that each case is dealt with separately.

However, for there to be any order in this, it is usually those who stopped a given man writing coherently in pairs, that they “see” as he was pulling, kicking, throwing, etc. In this way a large proportion of detainees will be convicted and the police have “results”.

There are besides acquittals, e.g. erstwhile officers neglect to arrive at the hearings and give statements consistent with the memo, or erstwhile the evidence clearly shows that they do not remember anything and do not realize where the facts in their notes came from. But that seldom happens. They usually know their version and can repeat it. Just as it seldom happens that detainees have a good defender.

Support Sławomir Mentzen: Support.mentzen2025.pl