I'm torn about the inexpensive liquor tubes. On the 1 hand, attachment to healthy freedom suggests that there should not be a ban. On the another hand, I have the impression that this is another action aimed at promoting the image of the Pole chochlegodrya, and at the same time water on the mill for the government in Warsaw. But in all of this, we're missing another perspective...
For respective days it seems that alleged alco-tubes have warmed up the Polish public debate to red (as if – by the way – we had nothing to do). Simon Holovnia, who barely wiped the dust out of Putin's shoes after trampling on Putin, now throws a glove to the producers of this singularity. It itself defines “evil in pure form”.
In turn, Łukasz Warzecha powerfully counters another attack by the Warsaw government of D. Tusk on products that are legally marketed on the market. Bantistan. A country where not only common sense matters, but even what is legal and legal – comments the editor.
However, before I go to the title suspicion that the full issue may be a bill, or at least it is very much on the hands of the Warsaw authority, I would like to draw attention to another – fundamental – aspect of the substance that is practically not mentioned. It is about culture, due to the fact that it is it that – as usual – comes to the another stage, not only in the layer of the speech of discussion, but above all in terms of principles.
In assessing these tubes from a cultural point of view, I would not go so far as to say that it is evil in pure form, but it is evil. Firstly, it is another manifestation of the infantilization of our culture, and secondly, playing on the circumstantial – mildly speaking – attachment of any people from our part of the planet to the low quality – and thus undrinkable – of "junk drinks".
I late saw a map showing the frequency of wine consumption in the world. I looked at her with sadness, due to the fact that – although with the bare eye you can see that customs are slow changing for the better – it is statistically inactive closer to the chaotic East than to civilized (in terms of culinary culture) countries.
In a word, the "monkey" number filled with inexpensive water is simply weak. Until a while ago, we would have said that this is the level of "gimbase". Not funny, not practical. And above all, what about people? At a time erstwhile more and more shops are selling good alcohol at increasingly better prices, thus raising the level of civilisation of Poles, specified a number can at most reverse us in development, or at least establish a highly harmful stereotype of a child-bearing Pole in his emotional attitude towards water.
I have already stressed respective times, and I intend to do so to the bottom that, where there is no affirmative pattern, there is degeneration. It is useful to direct these words to the Warsaw power – which is simply a denial of the right authority guided by the common good – but it is worth addressing them to Poles: only giving affirmative examples (teaching culturally the usage of good ones – this is comparatively expensive, so not utilized to get drunk – alcohols) can be a solution to the "alcoholic problem" in our country.
Finally, does the squad occupying the seats in Warsaw have any benefit from the appearance of these "monkeys"? Even if she, through any company, did not plant them in Polish stores, 1 thing is certain: the endless fight of power (let us say that in this respect the current 1 does not disagree from the erstwhile one) in order to prove to Poles that they are irresponsible and that their rights should be reduced even more, and again she leans towards our disadvantage.
Let us remember that in many municipalities Prohibition is already in force (and I do not take this nasty word in brackets, due to the fact that it truly works in the space of regulations and I heard it myself after 22 o'clock!), and late the Tusk government tried to completely destruct alcohol from gas stations (here I will mention that in my municipality the selection of Makłowicz on BP is the only place where I can buy decent wine).
As it is not known, it is about money (the alleged "to combat addictions" has a clear goal: to constantly rise excise duties and taxes). He rightly pointed out, as quoted above, that the alleged Law on Sobriety Education derives from a “deep commune”.
But it's besides more than that, which we're calling imponderabil. It's about freedom. The authority is that we should be ashamed of who we are in her opinion--to believe in the image that she promotes, and yet to kiss her hand, we should embrace our "care" for our "good" and indeed rejoice erstwhile this caring authority tells us clearly: you are allowed, and you are not allowed.
Filip Obara
We urge a conversation in the cultivator program on moral and cultural aspects of alcohol use:
