Almost without an echo, Jarosław Kaczyński, in an interview with the “Solidarity Tygodnik”, passed the announcement of a search for “a compromise on moral issues between conservative reasoning and liberal thinking”. The editor-in-chief of Tysol.pl responded well, who explicitly mentioned the demands of the left, with which specified a compromise would be made: killing children suspected of Down syndrome, compulsory sexual education in schools, chemical and surgical castration of minors. It is besides not amazing that the main Solidarity portal: "Poland needs development, not a moral compromise".
However, dominant in consequence to Jarosław Kaczyński's words, indifference is simply a bad sign for Polish politics. It illustrates how we are utilized to the fact that conformism, dualism, and readiness for tactical resignations take precedence over political maturity. This, however, is not the shrinking desire for power at the price of its own views, but the willingness to lead a political community in search of objectively just decisions, and besides firmly rooted in national cultural and political identity, Constitution and human rights.
Such a policy is simply a large challenge. erstwhile we hosted the Ordo Iuris Rocco Buttiglione Institute a fewer years ago, an Italian politician with an estimation recalled his friend Helmut Kohl, who, erstwhile asked about the importance of polls for a statesman, said "it is cognition of how many people must be persuaded to the solutions we believe in." Conducting politics according to objectively recognized right is besides nothing but following the guidelines of St John Paul II. The informing of the Holy Father against a democracy devoid of value, transforming into a “disguised or camouflaged totalitarianism” echoes constantly in the speeches of national politicians. Most often, however, without understanding.
The revolutionary left constantly undermines the foundations of social governance
All the more worrying about the open announcement of hypocrisy. The readiness to "public compromise" is accompanied by a ritual assurance that "of course we do not want to quit our views." However, the very vague category of "moral matters" as seemingly recognized and subjective is fundamentally false and represents a step towards the release of revolutionary radicals of the category in politics and life most crucial – truth. In addition, experience teaches that the compromises we are talking about here are nothing more than unilateral concessions from the position of human dignity, household defence and freedom. What is more, erstwhile a dedicated field almost never recovers, due to the fact that a revolutionary left, who is willing to encourage a favorable agreement for it, never goes for compromises and constantly undermines the foundations of social order.
In general, seeking a compromise seems to make sense of politics in a democratic republic. The point is, however, that for years, politics sought a compromise only in the narrow area of issues outside the area of civilization, spiritual and cultural consensus, covering issues crucial to the identity of the community. erstwhile a consensus falls as a consequence of the growth of revolutionary ideologies, it must not be replaced by freedom and ethical constructivism, but should be referred to the fact and built on it a policy. Any another policy thought will only bring the agony of a national community without nonsubjective foundations.
Marginalize Reality Counterfeiters
From the minute that open enemies of science, reason and fact entered the democratic scene, advocating that the authority of the state be harnessed to realise their ideology and utopia, any compromise with them becomes a step towards destruction. Under specified circumstances, healthy political communities enter open polemics and marginalize forgers of reality confronting them with fundamental, acquainted and defined facts.
For, before a compromise can be talked about, a well-defined consensus should be reached, based on clear and scientifically defined grounds. Otherwise, politicians are ready for hasty compromises, in front of the rational electorate, performers, and chandeliers of irrational and destructive policies. The end of the spiral of compromise is not only their political collapse, but besides the economic, social and cultural fabric of the community, followed by the weakening and political decline of the state. erstwhile they did not realize this compromise with nationalist left politicians of the conservative mainstream of the Weimar Republic. Today, many forms of Christian democracy in Europe have not seen this, which present reap the fruits of compromises with revolutionaries against the reason and nature of man.
All the more reason to remind modern politicians that compromise is not possible where it concerns verifiable data and the nature of man. In these areas, the only function of policy is to spread and advance truth, as all another solution will lead to the request to multiply further regulations and instruments of coercion. 1 transgression against fact has consequences in many areas.
Breaking the rights of the economy has consequences – breaking the rights of biology too
This is most evident in the usage of false marketplace instruments which produce unintended consequences due to inexorable marketplace rules and money values. erstwhile applied, the intervention, which introduces a false supply or request impulse, generates predictable effects that will inexorably accompany the first intended effect. A politician who ignores this, even though providing a "zero-percent" credit to young people, will not avoid a punishment in the form of an avalanche increase in housing prices erstwhile the marketplace adjusts prices to increased demand. In order to prevent this, there will be a natural temptation to increase supply by further regulations, whether by limiting the right to rent apartments, either by launching the improvement margin control or the work to sale immediately after completion of the investment. And these movements will make successive waves of unintended effects. The deeper the marketplace intervention, the more many and more serious the government will gotta deal with. The higher the costs of regulation, supervision and failure of profitability of the sector.
But to a lesser extent, this rule should be applied to violations of the laws of biology. A government that rejects the existence of 2 sexes must prepare for the consequences of rejection of truth. The smallest of them is to change the function of civilian position acts from a certain origin of information about a individual to the certification of individual identity preferences. There will be further restrictions – in the name of the protection of these subjective preferences – on the freedom of speech and expression of those citizens who inactive believe in the biological fact and want to proclaim it. This, in turn, means to intervene in the freedom of religion, at least those that grow out of a realistic designation of fact and falsehood by referring these categories to the acquainted and nonsubjective features of the surrounding reality. Finally, discipline itself must then admit the precedence of relativism, which will strike the very heart of the explanation of cognition which is at the root of the triumph of modern discipline and technology. From a small, it would seem, misdemeanors against biological truth, we rapidly scope the planet of universities implementing DEI policies (Diversity, Equity & Inclusion), which emphasize diversity and individual recognition at the expense of advancement and knowledge. The social, economic, cultural consequences of 1 specified intervention multiply with each specified regulation and adaptation, yet threatening the state and the full culture to fall. due to the fact that at the end of each specified process comes – on the economical side – cost, failure and poverty; on the social side – conflict, polarization, oppression and distribution of the political community.
Violation of a single rule entails the request to violate others – example of abortion
No wonder the same rules apply to life defence. Violation of the fundamental and human-wide rule that people are not killed and, in particular, children are not killed must lead to tsunami consequences. All the more so, erstwhile the government refuses to admit the effects of the improvement of discipline and medical knowledge, including recognition, previously only presumed due to the fact that hard to see, the fullness of the humanity of the unborn man. From genetics confirming full defined individual and unique DNA, through ultrasound diagnostics showing each physionomy, reflexes, heartbeat, feeling the pain of a child, to medicine that allows the endurance of an ever-born man or treatment, including surgery, unborn patient. Denying the humanity of an unborn kid became a consequence of the advancement of anti-scientific discipline a claim, equal to the economical views of communists or irrational claims of genderists. The effects of political rejection, contrary to discipline (and besides religion), of equal human legal position before and after birth are the collapse of the rationality of the full strategy of fundamental rights protection. This is what the Constitutional Court wrote about erstwhile in 1997 it pointed to the unacceptable, in the light of the regulation of law, the arbitraryness of the legislator's decision on the border on the protection of human life in isolation from the boundaries set by biology – conception and death.
The law should service the truth, the function of politics is to convince the community
It is up to policy in those areas that come to know to implement a law serving the truth. This concerns both the fact defined by the sciences and the cognition of human nature, including the character of a given political community, called national identity. The politician must be full aware that any another decision will turn to the detriment of the community.
Then, erstwhile fact indicates the request to make hard and unpopular decisions, the function of a statesman and even a average policy is not to escape the fact and to choose compromise solutions harmful, but to prudently convince the community of the necessity of moving towards truth. If democracy is flushed out of the belief that it is treated in partnership and seriously in the community, after a thorough explanation of the issue, it will support a decision based on truth, it will become a dictatorship of narratives and lies, and in the short word it will be doomed by creating an avalanche of consequences of rejection of truth.
Contrary to the belief in the post-policy era, policy is not to obliterate compromises and to search a "golden measure". specified a function of policy is simply a margin of its tasks, concerning these fewer large issues and a number of insignificant matters, the regulation of which is within the limits of the previously recognized fact and nature of man.
"Compromises" as an escape from responsibility
In this light, the request to search "moral compromises", which would include matters clearly identified in the spaces of discipline and fact about man, is, first of all, an escape from responsibility, but, above all, a cowardly shift distant from each another the burden of power, the task of which is not to search solutions that are easy but beneficial to the common good and the full political community.
Finally, the argument of pragmatic nature. Conformists are bored utilizing the definition of politics as the art of achieving objectives that can be achieved in given circumstances and times. Typically, this definition is intended to justify giving up the rule and to enable another one-sided compromise with the left. However, the correctly read rule should lead to the conclusion of the necessity of full faithfulness to truth, without the anticipation of concessions for falsehood, but with an indication of the anticipation of setting, according to conditions and times, priorities for rational policy. The choice of priorities, with a view to full safeguarding past achievements, is simply a policy of work for the community and awareness that the nonsubjective of achieving rational law and defending human dignity will take time.
In fact, devoured by conformism and relativism, in which fundamental values, specified as human dignity, freedom and family, can be called a "moral matter", a politician referring to rationality and the welfare of the community becomes a statesman. To a nation disappointed with the inideality of politics, specified faithfulness to fact is simply a fresh quality. erstwhile large and idealistic mainstream parties are incapable to see this process, they rapidly find that politics knows no vacuum.
Adw. Jerzy Kwasniewski, president of the Institute for Legal Culture Ordo Iuris
![[MC DATA] Experts sound the alarm. The vast majority of Poles do not yet have a PESEL number withheld](https://dzienniknarodowy.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dowod_osobisty_c_mondaynews_pl.jpg?v=1751964025)
