The conventional Italian commedia dell’arte tells how young people become vecchi ("old people"). They are usually misogynic erudite Dottore And a corrupt rich man Pantalones, fortunately conflicted with each other, so that at the end the youth win.
Write-paint the left in the election. Like during the Venetian carnival, I cheer the young people of the organization Together, wishing defeat to the “old people”. And I'm afraid everyone's going to hell!
However, since the return of the action in the form of the registration of the 2 “United Lefts” has appeared in this comedy, I must admit that I have no longer understood what the kaman and the łodafak about. I was happy to read text Rafał Kalukin in the latest "Newsweek", who tries to explain it scapologically.
In the beginning, at the end and in the mediate of Kalukin's text, however, he signals respective times that he is no longer certain of anything about it. There's no telling who's screwing around, who's putting a leg on who, and how many letters they're gonna registry at the end.
Kalukin tries to answer at least 2 of the questions that bother me: (1) Why the crazy thought of the SLD to rise its electoral threshold to 8%, erstwhile even with 5% can there be problems? (2) What do Rozenek and Napieralski expect, due to the fact that not to collect signatures under their “unified left”?
Kalukin's answers are something like that. Ad. 1: Miller and Palikot number on any secret probe that gives them 7-9% on condition of unity. Ad. 2: Rozenek and Napieralski number on the Secret Weapons in the form of the August 80 union, which will collect their signatures.
Of course, these answers are unusual in themselves. Kalukin besides writes that Rozenek – who a fewer months ago He said The desire to form an “a la early Korwin!” group is agreed with Petru. A cocktail made up of Zietka, Petru, Napieralski and Korwin (though and early) would be indigestible even for prof. Hartman?
I've heard about the Secret probe a fewer times, too, but it's unusual that the consequence has not been confirmed by public polls since. The SLD circulates in them alternatively around 4-5% (if you skip the “an survey on the portal”).
So I'm inactive confused by the Venetian masks. I did not realize the large argument about the ones anymore: since the SLD is the only partner of the coalition having a nationwide structure, anyway, the SLD candidate will get the most votes, even if there is individual from the Greens or Palikot. It's just that the local structure will play for the success of its own.
I have more questions. Does Miller believe in the Secret Survey? Can Hartman with these people halt vomiting (and how he does it by chewing ginger?). Is Palikot hiding another pig face?
Awal's Komcionauta sometimes flashed a amazingly far-reaching level of meanders of Polish politics. possibly he'll share the light of knowledge.
I'm certain there's only 1 thing I know. I vote for the young people of the organization together due to the fact that they have nothing to do with this swamp. They'll lose my support if they appear on 1 electoral list with depraved elders from the establishment.
