Recently, there have been times erstwhile a description with the inscription "conspiracy theory" is attached to everything that deviates from the authoritative version of reality presented to us in order to discredit uncomfortable facts. The question is how much this conscious action leads to question, to effectively blurring the circumstances of the case in order to avoid the consequences of the public's discovery of the truth, and how much interior opposition of naive, trivializing certain ambient signals contribute to what effectively throwing to the left and right the slogan of "conspiracy theory" media personalities resisting acceptance of certain information, a combination of dots that could lead to the demolition of their intricately built worldviews. Accepting something that doesn't fit into their heads, that fights with their construct and the perception of the world, as if examples of what people are able to do against each other, in past there were inactive few.
The planet accelerates day by day by day, flooding us with a sea of information, from which it is hard to catch what is close to truth, what is important. The fresh large planet does not look at anyone, precedes the participants of the event, overtakes the observers, leaving behind a cloud of dust that makes it hard for them to see clearly what is actually happening. And what happens in the background, behind the scenes, has small to do with the officially presented version and frequently exceeds our humble notions of human perfidy and vileness erstwhile it comes to power and money.
In the surrounding information noise, in order to catch up with your life and at the same time have a view of the situation as such, we frequently request to be subjective adequate (to not say consciously fabricated) a set of radio reports, tv news, press headlines or portal accounts and rolls. We are not able to be constantly "up-to-date", not to mention to dig into and verify the veracity of each message, study or report. The complexity of matters, processes and dependencies is increasing as is the amount of mass-produced cognition (this useful and useless one) which makes us halt following what is happening in the world. Unfortunately, it besides applies to those who make a image of reality: politicians, dormitories, journalists or various ointments of expected intellectuals and experts. To make matters worse, fewer of them are inclined to admit that in this course of events they lost sight of the guiding themes, no longer receiving an nonsubjective and coherent image of reality.
It is so hard to find what is the consequence of failure to inform, persist in misconceptions or conscious action to the benefit or disadvantage of certain entities, bodies, institutions, social groups or individual citizens. After all, most public individuals are an extension of all interest groups, represent them and are their lawyers, so they watch over the dissemination of authoritative positions and versions of events while acknowledging them as true, while affirming themselves in their own right and infallibility. Even erstwhile sometimes in this avalanche of conflicting signals are caused by their uncertainty, alternatively than based on facts, it is easier to return to the source, to convictions, to the acquired, even outdated information, to the proven, developed strategy of values, views and thoughts that form their identity. To the imagination of the world, which they uncritically accept, or actually together with the media in their eyes and in the eyes of the public, they make and perpetuate.
The tactics of discrediting your opponent in the eyes of the public has been applied for centuries Calling him a heretic, a recederator, paranoid (no substance how close it was to the truth), any time-effective invector was expected to make his opinion look dull and let go. Unfortunately, yesterday and today, people are besides effectively discredited by those who know more or only - as is frequently the case with confirmed "conspiracy theories" - faster. any people think they draw besides far conclusions, others who look more and more, who see the future effects of certain actions (the unconscious ones, but besides those with a premeditation of implemented ones), people who point to irregularities and criminal practices, uncomfortable facts or possible threats to humanity.
Today, the affixing of the description of "conspirators" to the voice raisers, and the "theory" they address, makes their opinions treated by most of the public as specified nonsense (I do not intend to mention here to the question of how far individual, more or little popular theories deviate from reality – I leave it to readers – I simply state the fact of their labelling to discredit). Even psychologists and sociologists, who attribute them to a figment of the imagination called "the providence logic" or the request to make "contrafcient speculation", were assigned to explain the phenomenon of conspiracy theories, which are intended to facilitate the compensation of existential anxiety for those poor, twisted individuals. To individuals who are thrown into 1 bag of all kinds of charlatans, from homeopathy to Scientology. In the end, this way, reports, arguments, even evidence that should be the origin of serious reflections, debates or investigations are treated with a baton.
![[MC DATA] Experts sound the alarm. The vast majority of Poles do not yet have a PESEL number withheld](https://dzienniknarodowy.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dowod_osobisty_c_mondaynews_pl.jpg?v=1751964025)
