The call for genocide was written on behalf of the Department of defence and published in "the most crucial media organization of the American Army".
.webp)
Official American military publication Army University Press published an article written on behalf of the Department of defence calling for cultural cleansing in the Gaza Strip and the demolition of Lebanon in November 2023.
This facility is described on its website as "a leading media organization of the American Army" and "the starting point for fresh thoughts and discussions on subjects crucial to the army and national defence", which "makes current and applicable information available to military, government and academic leaders".
While the article notes that "the views expressed in this article are the views of the author and do not reflect the views of the U.S. Army, Department of defence or any another U.S. government agency", the fact that specified a extremist proposal was published in the leading American Army publication shows that clear support for cultural cleansing and genocide is well accepted in intellectual and political circles.
The publication of the article coincides with Israel's unprecedented genocide attack on the besieged Gaza Strip after the Hamas attack of October 7. Israeli business forces attacked residential buildings, schools, hospitals, ambulances, medical personnel, paramedics and medical rescue teams, journalists, UN staff, mosques, churches, infrastructure, as well as cut off electricity and communication services. 10 November Gaza Ministry of wellness announced that it has lost its ability to track the victims, and its last authoritative number is 11 078 deaths, including 4 506 children, 27 490 injured and an additional 2,700 people trapped under rubble. It is estimated that 1.7 million people stay displaced, including 900,000 in 154 UNRWA shelters, any of which were bombed by Israel.
Sole Article (archived) was written by Omer Dostri, a erstwhile Likudu cameraman who is presently a national safety strategist in think tank Hawk Jerusalem Institute For safety and strategy and researcher in Israel defence And safety Forum.
Founded in 2017, to influence the Israeli interior discourse and drawing most of its staff from the Center for strategical Studies Likudnik Begin-Sadat, JISS is financed by Tikvah Fund, a divided of the American Republican Partywho seeks to advance the neoliberal Western-style capitalist model. The work of the late fresh York billionaire Sanford Bernstein (who later changed his name to Zalman after accepting Israeli citizenship) is seemingly financed from his estate, along with donations from American Zionist oligarchs, including Rebecca Sugar, a secret group of Jerusalem businessmen, and Australian venture capitalist Greg Rosshandler. Tikvah is headed by neoconservative financier Roger Hertog.
"It is my pleasance to present a survey which I am the author of commissioned US Department of defence and US Army's Military Review magazine. investigation digs into the political, strategical and tactical aspects of the #Hamas attack on #Israel and wars in #Gaza" – he praised Dostri on LinkedIn.
"Good work," commented Miriam Reichman, a erstwhile political intern in the Israeli mission to the UN.
While the American military paper describes October 7 as a terrorist attack, repeating discredited claims by the Israeli Government of head-cutting and rape, admits the sophisticated nature of the operation.
"This shameful attack was the work of a terrorist organization, but showed a unique military and professional approach, akin to the methods utilized by peculiar forces in regular armies. This highlights the crucial military and intelligence capabilities that Hamas has been developing meticulously over the years, especially in preparation for this devastating event," he wrote.
Dostri explains how Israel's "repeating policy" broke down as a consequence of the attack and why Israel must formulate a fresh strategy to keep its strategy of supremacy.
It lists 4 options to accomplish this. The first 3 service as a soapy eye, described briefly until it arrives as a preferred choice of cultural cleansing.
The first 2 options describe the Israeli military business of Gaza for a period of respective months to 2 years followed by an installation or "local administration", which has no connection to any Palestinian political body, whether Hamas or the Palestinian Authority, or the installation of the Palestinian Authority as the governing body. The first script assumed that the enclave would be divided into "four separate self-government regions, each of which would be led by prominent tribal power".
However, it rejects these options as impractical, as the option of the local administration would "be besides weak to safe public support", and the weakness of the Palestinian Authority "could possibly lead to the failure of power by extremist Islamists after their rebirth".
The 3rd option, as he writes, is the acquisition of civilian control by Saudi Arabia, Bahrain or the United arabian Emirates, while Israel or the United States deploy occupying forces. However, the article stresses that the uncertainty of coordination makes this thought unrealistic.
The perfect option, which, according to Dostri, will reconstruct "reinforcing" and guarantee "security" and accomplish victory, is Israel's re-occupation with Gaza in the long run, the cultural cleansing of hundreds of thousands of its Palestinian residents, the exponential expansion of the death region and the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip.
"From a safety point of view, the best choice for Israel is to occupy the Gaza Strip and establish a permanent military presence," he writes.
Dostri cites public support for the establishment of settlements in Gaza from "some Kneset members, public individuals, journalists and NGOs" who keep a long-standing Zionist belief that land theft and colony establishment is simply a appropriate response, not 1 that generates a violent reaction from Palestinians.
"The perspective, which is the foundation for those who advocate the establishment of Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip, is that the seizure and securing of land is simply a more crucial blow to extremist muslim terrorist groups than the elimination of terrorists and high-ranking leaders, outweighs the demolition of buildings and infrastructure and is more crucial than the capture of prisoners. This is seen as Israel's most dissuasive means and clear victory".
"For them a decisive land run in the Gaza Strip, covering the business of territories, the creation of fresh Israeli settlements and the voluntary resettlement of hundreds of thousands of Palestinians to Egypt without the anticipation of returning, will greatly strengthen Israeli deterrence and projection of influences across the mediate East".
While Dostri presents land confiscation and settlement creation as an innovative concept, it has always been the basis of Zionism, ideologically and practically.
In his own bookEthnoracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine, Israeli student Ofer Yiftachel describes a process of Judaism in which Zionist authorities expropriate the land to Palestinians, hand it over to Jews, restrict the improvement of Palestinians, while promoting exclusively judaic colonies, and Hebrewization of Palestinian local names and redefining borders to guarantee Zionist dominance. This was implemented in Galilee and in the Negev Desert, which are part of modern Israel, as well as the occupied territories of the West Bank.
This method has remained unchanged since the establishment of the State of Israel until today.
Ofir Dayan, who works at the Institute for National safety Studies and is the daughter of the erstwhile Israeli Ambassador to U Dani Dayan, wrote in August 2023 Article titled "An consequence to Terrorism – Strengthening Settlements in Judea and Samaria [emerged West Bank]".
Israeli NGO Kerem Navot notedthat "the decisions of the government to increase the presence of settlers in the West Bank, after events in which civilians are murdered or Israeli soldiers are killed, are regular in Israel".
In February, the Israeli government clearly statedthat "in consequence to the murderous terrorist attacks in Jerusalem, the safety Office unanimously decided to authorize 9 communities in Judea and Samaria [acquired West Bank]".
In Dostri's article, the option of cultural cleansing/institution, like the first and second presented option, would include the creation of a cooperative government that would regulation the remaining Palestinians with "central local leadership or division of territory into self-government districts with separate leadership in each district".
These population clusters would be surrounded by "significant buffer zones extending over respective kilometres to guarantee strategical depth and let fast consequence to possible future terrorist incursions".
Israel has long introduced alleged "buffer zones", declaring that the land – most of which are intended for agricultural usage – hundreds of metres from the Israeli barrier in Palestinian territory must be deprived of any structure, and Palestinians, who set ft in or close this area, are being shelled on site by Israeli snipers and remotely controlled device guns.
Dostri's proposal calls for the expansion of these zones, absorbing more land and even more focusing the Palestinian population even in tiny densely populated areas, most of which are now rubble as a consequence of Israel's mass demolition of Gaza. This is the same strategy applied on the occupied West Bank, where Palestinian population clusters are surrounded by militarized Israeli settlements, strategically deployed to prevent any adjacent Palestinian territory.
Dostri is even more clear in opinions published in Israeli media. W article of November 19, in the Jerusalem Post, calls for Israeli settlements to be established in Gaza – fundamentally utilizing Israeli civilians as surviving shields – to guarantee security.
It is essential to recognise a serious and strategical mistake in the artificial separation of "security" governments from "civil" governments in Gaza. This division is inherently flawed, due to the fact that actual safety will be elusive without the permanent presence of Israeli civilians on site.
History shows that Israeli safety forces yet withdrew from regions without judaic settlements, resulting in the transformation of these areas into terrorist bases.
This pattern is manifested in various parts of Judea and Samaria, Lebanon, Gaza Strip, and even, to a lesser extent, Sinai. There is no reason to presume that a akin script will not take place again in Gaza. Without the Israeli presence of civilians, the IDF forces, with no military purpose, will most likely leave, giving an chance to re-emerge Palestinian terrorism.
Moreover, Israeli settlements in the Gaza Strip offer benefits specified as increased freedom of action for safety forces, better protection through the addition of civilian safety forces and high-quality long-term intelligence.
Strategic architectural planning may include dividing the territory into different segments, facilitating better control of safety forces. Like in Judea and Samaria, settlements in Gaza would supply key support and physical and spiritual assistance to soldiers in the field who realize the intent of their presence.
Dostri reiterates her call for cultural cleansing of Palestinians from Gaza, writing that "Israel should argue the return of hundreds of thousands of Gaza residents who evacuated to the confederate Gaza Strip" and calls for agreements with the countries of the region to expel Palestinian refugees in Sinai.
He praises the war in the Gaza Strip as "a historical and unparalleled chance to transform the scenery of threats and "change the demographic balance in the region".
Finally, he concludes that Israel should deceive the planet as to its actual intentions, writing that "the leaders of the country should not let this chance get out of hand, and they should surely avoid making a loud announcement to the full planet that they renounce it."
To accomplish these goals, the Pentagon paper Dostri proposes a "wide-ranging and synchronised military operation to occupy the Gaza Strip", consisting of an air bomb run followed by a land operation. His plan mostly coincides with what the Israeli army is presently implementing and assumes that the land operation will take 2 to 3 months.
He calls for "electronic war, electromagnetic war, and cyber war" and for disruptions in energy supplies "out of Israeli government's decision to cut power in the Gaza Strip".
Dostri believes that this run will destruct the Hamas tunnel system, and will besides inflict a intellectual blow through the tactics of "shock and horror" which "distorts their will to proceed fighting".
This run of mass execution and destruction, according to Dostri, defeats Hamas militarily and forces him to resign from the armed struggle.
"This overall strategy aims to prompt the enemy to surrender quickly, providing the State of Israel with political maneuverability in making decisions according to its objectives," writes Dostri.
Dostri admits that the mission will affect "relatively advanced costs in the form of casualties among soldiers and resource allocation", but specified dedication will guarantee her success.
The Hamas attack of October 7, he says, forced Israel to quit hesitation before sending soldiers into danger and convinced its leaders that the price of blood was worth it.
"October 7 events irreparably changed circumstances, forcing Israel and IDF to make hard decisions. Although the hazard to the life of IDF personnel is significant, it is now inevitable that the imperative is to defeat Hamas and take control of Gaza for the sake of future generations," he writes.
The paper admits that the war in the Gaza Strip can easy turn into a regional war. He urges Israel to make "an impression that Israel behaves unpredictablely in Gaza" to deter Hezbollah and argues that the more Israel intensifys its attacks on Hamas, with a greater and more deadly force, the more likely Hezbollah will be deterred. He believes that the deterrence of Israel against Hezbollah is understandable, "especially erstwhile the United States deploys its most powerful force in the region and openly and decisively supports Israel, coupled with clear US threats to Israel's opponents considering their engagement in conflict."
However, this deterrence policy against Hezbollah undermines the US's force on Israel to avoid serious escalation on the northern front, which In fresh days, they have expressed High-ranking Biden administration officials.
The strategy of maintaining a low-intensity armed conflict throughout the war in the Gaza Strip will exhaust Hezbollah's military arsenal and should be linked to the deliberate killings of Hamas and muslim Jihad leaders in Lebanon.
Dostri argues that Israel must besides keep the anticipation of an open war with Lebanon, including a massive air run and a land invasion into the confederate part of the country. This option would mean "the complete demolition of Hezbollah and the demolition of Lebanon's national and critical infrastructure, which will yet lead to the collapse of the country".
In any case, Dostri writes, Israel will yet attack Lebanon to defeat Hezbollah, as it is presently doing with Hamas in Gaza. "The question is not now whether Israel will take action to defeat Hezbollah, but when".
He besides recognises the capabilities of the Syrian military, the popular militias in Syria and Iraq and Yemeni Hutich, although he downplays any threat they pose due to the fact that their rocket arsenal "has not yet reached a scope that represents a crucial and direct threat to Israel". (His article was published before Huti took over the Israeli cargo ship.)
However, it is worth noting that Dostri's unthought-out analysis does not mention to the anticipation of direct engagement of Iran in the regional war, which is certain if Israel were to effort militarily to defeat Hezbollah and level Lebanon with the ground, which it calls for. This would be an existential threat to Israel.
In general, Dostri's article boils down to a summons to commit crimes against humanity. Many statements that, in the case of the war crimes trial, would service as clear evidence of intent to commit genocide, which is notoriously hard to determine. The fact that this conversation was published on behalf of the Department of defence and in the US Army's main media arm gives emergence to questions about American guilt for genocide in Gaza, which is mainly made utilizing bombs and missiles produced in American factories, and about the U.S. government's actual intentions.
While Dostri writes as if he were a kid playing with toys in his sandbox, he ignores the wider geopolitical hazard and the likelihood that the escalation of the actions for which he advocates, especially in Lebanon, will transform the Israeli run of mass demolition in Gaza into a devastating regional conflict that may even trigger a possible planet war with atomic weapons.
The Barbarian invasion of Israel has been going on for the seventh week, so only time will show how far it will go, how many people will kill and to whose borders war will reach.
https://www.uncaptured.media/p/pentagon-publishes-proposal-for-ethnic
