erstwhile Tusk frequently talks about something, feel the spirit! Something's cooking. Although he speaks small and vaguely of the reconstruction of the government, it is strangely easy to accept the result of the election. Meanwhile, on the political stage, the number 1 announcer becomes Roman Gierty. He's been on the political ladder for a long time. He ate bread from many furnaces. He ate it abundantly at Father Rydzyk's table, and he owes it much to him, and now he must spit more abundantly on it so that his fresh friends would not remind him of it. Let his Catholicism justice everyone as he pleases. PiSu hated, like his father, Maciej, who wrote in 1919 before the election: "With a sense of duty, I would like to inform all of my fellow countrymen before voting for the Law and Justice. I compose to lay Catholics in our country, due to the fact that unfortunately the advice they receive in this respect from the hierarchy, priests and Catholic media are incorrect and with unheard arrogance enter a region of secular freedom. (...) The Church of Poland, which has always been an arbitrator in our country in various disputes, including the dispute about fundamental nature – is it allowed to break power to the democratically passed Constitution? – he stands by the troublemakers and aggressors, and fights those who argue it.” There is no time or place to comment on this letter. It is something highly perverse and perverse. It is worth noting that by informing Catholics of the choice of PiSu, which means calling voters to vote on politicians who do not have a Decalogue. and the leftist-liberal program as a direction of politics, Maciej Gierty besides accuses the Church of alleged mixing into politics. Here he has just shown Gierty what he can do and how pride can deprive individual of reason. Who does he call troublemakers and aggressors? Who breaks shamelessly not only democracy but law and constitution? Who pursues authoritarian rule? In whose interests are people close to Gierty? If they had won in 2019, Poland would not be, as it is today, at the edge of the abyss, but at its bottom. Giertych cites John Paul II, who actually invited him to participate in the secular synod, where he writes, the name to explain the function of the secular in the conduct of public affairs, and to identify who should be voted on is in no case the function of clergy or Catholic media. This is strange, due to the fact that both the Primate of the Millennium and John Paul II expressly obliged Catholics to vote for people who were trustworthy in the Church. On the another hand, Giertych, scorning the choice of people promoting LGBT, abortion of free unions, destroying the household and promoting perverts, present acts in the other direction of the Holy Pope. His successor Benedict XVI emphasized this very clearly, what Giertych understands again in his own way: Catholic cannot vote for a pro-abortion policy – it would seem to be obvious. However, Roman Giertych recalled the card. Ratzigner to show that sometimes specified a policy can be supported. What did the Prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of religion compose about voting for abortionists? due to the fact that Ratzinger made the substance clear and did not accept compromises on essential matters. He besides said Homosexual matrimony and abortion in the planet is simply a sign of Antichrist's spiritual strength.
The fact that Roman Giertych always treated his Catholicism as a trampoline, from which he leaped on purpose, or not, at any level of his career, which is always his priority, is not, in the end, something shocking. He wasn't the only one. However, it offends his insolence and arrogance erstwhile he dares, emphasizing his Catholicism, prompting him to vote on the atheistic environment and this Catholicism hostile. The fact that at the minute erstwhile the patron of LGBT and all "others", as well as abortion lost to the will of most people, makes Gierty enter the scurries to save the dying strategy "democracy fightingj” and lawlessness. This is crucial and gives emergence to certain assumptions. Tusk became for the European Union, read: German, useless, due to the fact that most Poles met at its goals and ways of promoting them. So there is simply a request to find individual more effective than him. Interestingly, Gierty abruptly remembered his German, actual or imaginary roots. Germany likes to act decisively, what Hitler tried, and the nation gladly accepted. Of course, a lot has changed today, but not everything. In Germany, Poles are inactive their own. kind Untermensch. Without specified people as the Giertychs, Tusk and their sidekicks, however, it will not be possible for Poles to be sedated adequate to rise. Grossdeutschland. Gau Polen. The choice of Nawrocki has thus caused rage and horror in the European Union, which is de facto no longer existing in its fundamental form, but as the prefield of large Germany. Hence, 1 needs individual without moral inhibitions and concern for Poland, to bring this work of demolition and subsequent enslavement to an end. Tusk must have failed. That is why Giertych stands for tender for Poland today. Not the first and not the last, but so far only Piasecki offered his services in the halo of the Catholic. The Primate of the Millennium almost to the last minute before his arrest, he was conversing with Piasecki, of whom he wrote in his records that he was a bad man to be shunned. But where did Giertych go to Piasecki?
Tusk, unlike Piasecki, is only guided by his own good. There is not even a small noble concern for Poland. It can be seen in Gomulka, Piasecki and part of the communist nomenclature. Giertych lacks it completely, which is why what he does is so terrifying. In his rivalry with Tusk, he can only offer the Germans not allowing the elected Democratic president to take office. Legality and democracy have nothing to number on. I wonder if Tusk or Gierty will scope after specified a coup. In both cases, in the interests of Germany.
