A comic phenomenon (blogo-foro)the spheres were always migrants, they tried to imagine Poland on the basis of what they read in the portaloza and in the statements of akin blog-foronauts. The dying Salon24 is most likely the last place to track this phenomenon.
Now immigrants are convinced that local elections have been falsified in Poland. So they're expecting any crowds of demonstrators coming out.
These crowds, as you know, never leave. At most, a tiny group of “defensors of the cross” comes out, setting up their camp in the mediate of the pub trail. And then the migrants are outraged that from where are drunk people at night?
So if there's no crowd on the streets, then the nation's being fooled by the media. That's what it looks like in a typical emigrant blogphorocomb.
Media, meanwhile, play a negative function here, but vice versa – they turn up problems in search of clickability. That's where the exaggerated rumors about the possible impact of a failed computer program on the election result came from.
Everyone heard that “a candidate won in Szczecin, which was not on the list”, due to the fact that it is clickable and virulent. It is known that social media maveni will throw specified plug-ins on their Facebooks and twitters, due to the fact that they besides produce them.
And it truly was that the committee in Szczecin, yes, got the incorrect consequence first, and then corrected it. There was never specified a anticipation that the mistake of the programme would affect the results of the elections, due to the fact that the task of the programme was not to replace the counting of votes in committees, but to aggregate the results on a national scale.
The failure of the program is so liable for the fact that we received good infographics for the media late. But she could not influence the division of positions on the municipal council in Mycules Nizhny. Nor the advanced Ones. Or anywhere.
Am I saying nothing happened? Of course it happened and I anticipate a resignation in the PKW and the CBW. Which, by the way, have fallen apart.
Am I not amazed by the good PSL score? Nope.
The Polish village leapt in Poland 2 decades of 2 centuries. The huts covered with herds and carts on the dirt roads disappeared.
All that's left is asphalt, a bauma cube, a metallic rod and a brand-new tractor parked in front of a garage opened to the pilot. And the EU logo on the board telling what was done in the municipality with the Brussels dofinance.
Hope that the Polish village will support any anti-EU or anti-democratic force is naive. No 1 gained from transformation and integration as much as the village.
Who do they owe it to? In their (often apt) belief – especially PSL. Then you are amazed that they like this organization to the PO-PiSu (together with the 1 taken?).
At the same time, in a country where the “rural” is inactive an insult, I am not amazed that any people may not want to admit to voting for the PSL. So I explain the discrepancy of exit polls and the actual results.
Am I not amazed by the advanced percent of invalid votes? Neither. It's mostly blank pages. That is, voices “against everything”.
Because of the past, we're obsessed with our ordination being democratic to pain. We couldn't decide whether to vote for people or parties, so we have a code that connects it.
Hence our (un)famous "choicebooks" to vote for 1 candidate out of respective hundred. It doesn't make sense, especially in the naturally stubborn elections, like voting for provincial seymites.
Of the candidates for my card-book for the Provincial Sejm, I didn't virtually know anyone. I think it's like most of the comms.
That is why I am not amazed that a individual with a strong preference for a candidate for city president or councillor, at the same time did not have an opinion in the election to the provincial parliament. And she just threw in a blank part of paper.
The electoral procedure should so be simplified. In my opinion, in the elections to the Sejm (and possibly the council of the district) 1 can skip this "vote for persons". Let's leave the parties/committees so the electoral card can be a card again.
It's most likely besides extremist and it won't go away, so let's at least rework the card-book pattern according to a reasonable request that the first page should, in principle, contain a list of contents and instructions. But again, is that a reason to demonstrate?
