The wellness of citizens is not at the expense of the state.

zukowska.com.pl 4 months ago

I'm not happy about the wellness situation. I think it could be much better, but to make it much better, there is simply a request for much more money, which is not in the budget and cannot be brought to the budget out of nowhere.

As you can see, the issue of the wellness contribution and its conversion to a wellness tax, which would besides be paid by commercial law companies, adding to the wellness protection of Poles and Poles – this is our proposal. This is simply a substance of fat tax, taxation increases on alcohol – which was vetoed by president Nawrocki. This is simply a parliamentary project, due to the fact that unfortunately Minister Domański was not in favour, even though he is Minister of Finance, a bill that brings this money to the budget and does not take it away.

Tax increases in Poland. The wellness backing strategy needs to be changed. And if we are even talking about the taxation system, it should be simpler and fairer. There should be more taxation thresholds, due to the fact that if we have a threshold up to the age of twenty-six, which is actually zero, then it is 12%, and then a leap to 32%, it is not fair that there is no additional threshold between these rates. besides above these 32% should appear another threshold rather quickly.

In addition, we have a situation in which many people are either on a flat-rate basis, or they are fictitiously active in economical activity, which means that the cover-up is lower, and the funds that should go into the budget are not going there. This is weakening the state, deceiving fellow citizens, and truly besides our own families. due to the fact that our parents or pensioners later search aid in wellness care and wait in long queues.

We see that since we have a scale tax, a linear taxation and a flat-rate tax, it makes a multitude of different forms, and the uniformity of the strategy is not preserved. This is frequently not fair, due to the fact that the richest are not taxed according to these taxation thresholds. Only about 3% of taxpayers are accounted for at the second threshold.

Read Entire Article