The parliament of the fresh word of office began working on laws by addressing the civilian draft in vitro backing bill from the budget. The symbolic dimension of this bill is apparent – the task is civic, and so it is simply a tribute to those who have collected half a million signatures. If the majority that wants to build a government under Donald Tusk can be voted on, this will be the first successful vote on the bill in the fresh Sejm.
There's besides a trap in this process. The task is simply a consequence to the actions of the Government of the United Right – the others took the money for in vitro, the fresh will. But in the course of the parliamentary debate, speaking of in vitro, women have been mentioned many times, even Joanna Scheering-Wielgus of fresh Left spoke of “the dignity of women”. And that, unfortunately, covers the another cases of women that this Sejm has to deal with.
You know I'm talking about almost to abortion. But besides about the right of women to marry women (and men to men).
But alternatively of complaining, it may be worth reasoning that there are a fewer reasons for joy, and in the ongoing debate you can see the advantages.
‘Decision case’ and ‘rich could’
Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz talks about in vitro: "This is simply a household matter, a substance of their decisions, but [the family] must have a choice" and adds that the elimination of in vitro backing from the budget was aimed at poorer. "It was cruel that they could not afford it, due to the fact that if individual was rich, he could usage it [in vitro]".
If we replaced "in vitro" with "abortion", it would turn out that this is besides a substance of decision – in the first case of the family, and in the issue of abortion of the woman, or if she wants, it would be women and her families. The cruel thing is that if women can't afford to go abroad, if they don't have a network of contacts that can aid them get the money for abortion, and sometimes they just won't get to the abortion pill, there's no way to choose. And a rich female can handle it. Just like Kosiniak-Kamish or Cezary Tomczyk from PO said.
"We have this strength, we have the power," he added at the end of Kosiniak-Kamish's seismic appearance. Sounds almost like a song from Ice lands Or like Majka Jeżowska's song We have power., encouraging to go to the final elections as part of the Political Critic Profession Campaign.
‘Long to women’
Agnieszka problem with the PSL during her essay she said she was happy, arrogant as a individual who worked for women and encouraged them to vote. "The fact that we will adopt the In vitro Act, we pay the debt we incurred to the women who trusted us," said the MP.
Once again, the word “in vitro” can be replaced by “abortion” – it will besides be paying off debt to women.
Here I urge Text by Michał SutowskiWhich, in short soldier words, explains why today's majority will lose the presidential election if it doesn't seriously address the abortion access bill.
‘The State is simply a civilian contract’
Margaret Rozenek-Majdan, a celebrity who is active in the draft citizens' bill, in the program Yes, sir. on TVN24 she said she appreciated the signal sent from the Sejm saying, "Your voice matters."
What is more interesting is what she said about measures that request to be utilized to finance the in vitro procedure. Why should a full society consist of a procedure that fewer will benefit from? Rozenek explained that "the state is simply a citizen's contract and each of us, by dropping taxes to the state budget, knows that it will not get all the diseases that the NFZ has in its area of benefits, but we agree a small virtually that I will pay for your illness, you will pay for my illness."
And so on the subject of taxes and contributions to the NFZ, it seems that we are a community and that we share the activities of this community. So I hope that if the in vitro bill goes through the Sejm, then this community will be remembered by all taxpayer. You pay, you pay – so that we can all live decently.
"Women have different needs"
Women are not a sack of identical people with the same needs. Wanda Nowick's MP correctly said in her speech in the parliament that “a female erstwhile needs contraception and the government has a work to supply it, another time a female has a request to halt her pregnancy for various reasons, and that is besides the work of a state whose PiS could not be achieved and women sometimes died due to it, but it is simply a dog's work to aid women in this situation. Sometimes women request in vitro due to the fact that they want to get pregnant.” There is no contradiction, there is simply a variety of needs.
Nowicka added that "women have different needs for their reproductive wellness and the state has a work to supply them".
My fingers crossed for all the women and their loved ones who want children and request the support of the state and community to get them. I'm besides keeping my fingers crossed for any female who doesn't want to have children, who got into unwanted pregnancy and needs the support of the state and community to get her.
