The blocked Strait of Ormuz, the breaking supply chains, the European energy crisis and the spectrum of inflation return – these are no longer theoretical scenarios. This is simply a violent reality caused by the war in Iran, where the situation seems to escalate overnight.
As the United States and Israel struck Iran, the authoritative message announced a fast and precise show of force. Meanwhile, today, we are witnessing news chaos and war spending in the order of billions of dollars to fight the inexpensive drones of the opponent. To Iran's asymmetrical response, Americans seem to have no clear strategy, revealing their decision-making helplessness.
On the another hand, we can see a different narrative, according to which the U.S. does not follow the way of strategical failures and decision-making chaos. According to her, we are observing the cynical 5D chess organization played by the Trump administration, in which the main goal is not Iran, but Russia and China.
So is what we observe from the American administration a superb bluff or strategical stupidity? In this article, I will put together these 2 narratives to see which 1 is closer to the fact and to find whether the present global hegemon truly has the situation under control.
America is losing control. Facts proving U.S. defeat.
The United States has engaged in another war in the mediate East, which may have evolved into a creeping conflict, something Donald Trump surely wanted to avoid. all day the White home provides a number of indications to believe that it acts chaoticly, in an unthought-out way, and simply cannot manage the situation effectively. So let us look at the individual aspects of this narrative.
Dependence on Israel. War on another's wish?
So far, the claims of Israel's influence on US abroad policy have not been met with the approval of the wider American community. However, fresh developments have changed the optics and present many commentators clearly point to Tel Aviv's key role. For example, the crimes committed in Gaza on the civilian population – all of this with clear US approval and military support. present ]]>War on the Persians]]> erstwhile again, it highlights this peculiar relation in which the tail waves the dog.
Already in 2020, we could symbolically see the attitude of the president of the United States to Israel. Trump personally designed the large “Key to the White House” and presented his first copy in the Oval Office of Netanyahu, saying, “This is the key to our country and our hearts.” A fewer years later in December 2025, i.e. 3 months before the outbreak of the war, during a Hanukkah reception at the White House, publicist Mark Levin introduced Trump as the first judaic president. This 1 did not object, but with a grin and a clapping area he said it was true.
Donald Trump hands the Israeli Prime Minister the key to the White House. Source: NY Post
That's not all, of course. They follow the gestures ]]>big money]]> and a ruthless policy of influence.
At this point, mention should be made to the AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), which is simply a powerful lobbying group whose aim is to de facto guarantee consistency between American abroad policy and Israeli interests. They created their own political committees (so-called Super PACs, specified as the United Democracy Project), which can collect and spend unlimited amounts from billionaires and corporations for election campaigns. We're talking about tens of millions of dollars pumped into all election cycle. The consequence is that if a politician votes in favour of Israel's military support, he can number on generous donations from AIPAC. All the more so before the midterms coming in November, no American politician (both Democratic and Republican) dares to stand up to Tel Aviv, who in specified a case would launch a black run against specified a rebel.
So let's go over the analysis of the events of the past weeks. First of all, Israel attacked precisely erstwhile the US was negotiating terms of deescalation with Iran. Tehran was ready to make concessions, which made Tel Aviv decide to act preemptively and put the State before the fact made. Secretary of State Marco Rubio admitted to journalists that the strike was not due to a direct threat to America, but to the fact that Israel had made a decision earlier:
We knew there would be Israeli action. We knew that this would provoke an attack on American forces and we knew that if we did not strike preventively before they [Iran] carried out these attacks, we would endure higher losses.
Mark Warner, a associate of the Intelligence Commission, expressed himself even more clearly. He heard at a closed gathering that Iran posed a threat to Israel alternatively than the US. The alignment of the direct threat to Israel with the immediate threat to America was defined as entering an unknown territory. The word “direct threat” allows the president to make an independent decision on the attack without the consent of Congress. Israel has no authoritative defence agreement with the US, nor does it belong to NATO. So it seems that the interests of a abroad state have been put on the same footing as those of the United States. This is an unprecedented event and creates the hazard of Trump making independent decisions about the attack, and it is Warner who describes alarmistly as entering “unknown territory”. To date, the U.S. has never "give" their army at the disposal of a abroad country with which there is not even a strict defence pact.
Israel in its rocket attacks went very far. He dropped bombs on 4 Iranian oil terminals around Tehran. Smoke covered the sun and led to acid rain. There are besides recordings of the usage of white phosphorus in Lebanon – a chemical weapon causing serious burns. Even utmost pro-Israeli Senator Lindsey Graham stated that any of Israel's actions had gone besides far. This shows how extremist Israel is in its action, and how much he cares about the maximum demolition of Iran, which is surely not in the hands of the States, due to the fact that it leads to uncontrolled escalation, which is later on.
If the United States is fighting in Iran in the interests of another country and even in peculiar does not hide its pro-Israeli attitude, the basic question at this point is: why do they do it? The answer can be, among others, ]]>revealed at the turn of January and February Epstein's file, which shook public opinion]]>Although any of them are inactive censored (hidden of perpetrators) and undisclosed. On this wave, discussions about Trump's connections to Epstein were heated. Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell (daughter of Robert Maxwell, a longtime Mossad agent) may have led a gigantic sex blackmail network aimed at the western and American political and financial elites on behalf of the State of Israel. Unconditional submission to the U.S. Administration may besides be partially due to the desire to silence all this confusion in exchange for conducting an attack on Iran. At this point, it seems that the subject of the act has gone to the background, which confirms interest in the slogan "Epstein Files" in Google:
At a time erstwhile Israel and the U.S. bomb Iran, it appears that any undisclosed acts are being destroyed. At the same time, Donald Trump publically called for the rejection in the upcoming election of Thomas Massie, liable for the disclosure process. Can a world-wide hegemon fighting on behalf of a smaller and weaker state be considered a country capable of successfully fighting for the planet primacy? Even despite specified blatant dependence on Israel, a skillful information run could effectively hide it by selling to the Americans a communicative they would believe. Is that truly so?
Continue reading: ]]>Independent Trader - independent financial portal]]>
Source: ]]>Independent Trader]]>
Author: ]]>Paul Cream]]>
