Winners, losers and neuters – summary of the debate

patrzymy.pl 2 months ago

Everyone saw how it was and everyone will insist on their versions of events, but that doesn't change the basic fact in the least. 1 large loser and this 2 debates is Rafał Trzaskowski, the second TVP in liquidation. Who won? There will be no agreement here, and even supporters of Maciej Maciak will lift their hands up, although it was definitely the weakest, and long embarrassing fragments candidate. Applying an nonsubjective measurement to a evidence 3.5 hr debate, it can be said with a clear conscience that everyone but Trzaskowski and Maciak played something.

The most played by Karol Nawrocki, his performance was the best of all performances to date and he made it in his debut, although it was a debut spread out into installments, but he jumped into deep water and did not drown, only in good kind he sailed to shore. And he played the most due to the fact that he was the only presidential candidate next to Trzaskowski to fight in the second round. The difference between the 2 rivals is about 27 to 35%, or 8 percent, and theoretically it is simply a lot, but if after the Friday revolution Trzaskowski loses 3 percent and Nawrocki gains 3 percent, the distance will decrease to 2 percent. This correction is not only possible, it is very real, and then even more panic will begin in Mr Rafał's camp.

It is besides impossible to collect points and second place among the beneficiaries of Simon Holownia, primarily due to the fact that he started the full debate with many candidates. It's hard to tell if he's back in the game, but he's surely 1 of those who can take the percentages from Trzaskowski and the absent Mentzen. In a akin situation Magdalena Biejat, she besides drew from the origin of 2 competitors today. The reflection of the rainbow flag to Trzaskowski made a large sound on the Internet, and it will not be “the rainbow Rafał”. In turn, the absence of Adrian Zandberg is besides a good chance to shift the electorate to the left.

Krzysztof Stanowski could even take a seat in front of the Holovnia, but he was behind the podium for 1 reason – making fun of politics and unfortunately during the presidential election. Stanowski has a chance to play a useful function in what he does, but he must be more of a bra than a stand uper. During the debate he has repeatedly shown that he can be a bran, but the full run runs in a clown style, subject to his business, so for him the profit is only and until free advertising. He most likely besides gained a fewer percent points, but no “black horse” will be there, which was not long ago for besides many experts.

The other of Stanowski is Marek Jakubiak, a serious, permanent man, and at times a real stableman who can say unpopular things, like compulsory military service. His speech was soothing to reason and acted as a window beginning in the locker area after a wu-ef lesson. Unfortunately, Marek Jakubiak would alternatively not rise his position on the presidential list significantly, although he deserved it very much. It is in politics that wise and courageous people are not doomed to success, but very frequently must fight for survival.

Maciej Maciak mentioned at the beginning definitely stepped distant from the full stake, looked like he had mistaken weddings and tried to find at least 1 uncle with whom he could put out a glass for the wellness of young people (Polish). No 1 found himself like this and it was hard to be surprised, due to the fact that it was hard to realize what this candidate meant, but that he is the weaker version of Wojciech “Jarat” Olszański. Democracy has its rights and anyone who has collected 100,000 votes should benefit from the rights of the presidential candidate. However, Mr Maciak's performance leads to reflection, which aims to rise the threshold to 200 000.

Historically, the debate will go beyond uncertainty into the textbooks of political discipline and will be in many chapters. 1 of them will be entitled: “How to lose at your own request, not with 1 but with all opponents, but with Matiak”. Rafał Trzaskowski will gotta undergo deep therapyBecause with the bare eye you can see that the 2020 defeat trauma has returned. Karol Nawrocki in miraculous circumstances matured politically and scored the first winning battle. Debates usually don't change anything, but this 1 has quite a few possible to change a lot!

We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!

Read Entire Article