Who's worth talking to and who isn't?

.

Nothing stands in the way that the Super admin “jon” makes the axis comparisonauRDP and IIIRP rots, but in a fair way – likewise reasoning can besides do so

.

My tekstIs it possible to fight poorness and to preserve Western values -?published on NEon24 caused rape thereau Super admin reaction “jone” which in a creative drive but with “unspecified” intentions, though for reasoning Readers rather easy to dispelencryption, spawned as many as 2 “polemic” texts:
Dedicating to the large PeeReLuandOrphans after PRL.

Interestingly, my text didn't apologize PRL, I just posted it a fewer sentences Not knownau Informationand About where he got it from. au "Gierek's debt" and how it was with this overthrow of the PRL by "democratic forces". The vast majority of the text afraid the anticipation of poorness eradication under IIIRP conditions.

But seemingly something said – What? – Super admin “jon” blow cold – Because like this, any “light” force spits on the PRL, and here the text of any net user disturbsed It's okay.shaped in many minds, average negativeher image or what do not give “debt” will reverse the correct, developed view: the PRL must absolutely spit. Super admin “jon” his spitting action PRL started with unfair and unique Insolent action illustrating my text with a image of a tape railway in front of the shop, which was a disincentive procedure both the text and its author.However, the actions of this individual are no surprise to me, I will admit honestly that I even expected it – I already understood his game.I already know, and the Readers could besides evidence that the Super admin “jon” surely is not an orphan after the PRL, is alternatively a preeminent of the modern IIIRP, its judaic capitalism and democracy, and as such, the preeminently displays the appropriate features of its underdevelopment and is incapable to realize that different, free, any opinions, views, may relate to abstract areas, e.g. religion, art – the Kowalski's image likes it, and Nowak does not. But the fields, phenomena that can be described in mathematical language, e.g. the country's economy, they cannot be subject to opinions on a general basis like it or not – only fools or individuals who are dishonest, manipulating the unconscious remainder can do so.

Nothing stands in the way that the Super admin “jon” makes the axis comparisonauPRL and IIIRP rots, but in a fair manner – can be usedfrom any source, statistical studies.

Such comparison should include, for example:

unemployment rate:PRL ... ; IIIRP ...

homelessness: PRL ... ; IIIRP ...

Natural growth: PRL ... ; IIIRP ...

food self-sufficiency: PRL ... ; IIIRP ...

energy self-sufficiency: PRL ... ; IIIRP ...

Total abroad debt: PRL ... ; IIIRP ...

size of Polish production assets: PRL ... ; IIIRP ...

exports of industrial products (only Polish companies): PRL ... ; IIIRP ...

exports of agri-food production (only Polish companies): PRL ... ; IIIRP ... and etc.

And only then will the Super admin choose the “jon” object to spit – just in case it is better not to stand in front of the mirror.

And erstwhile we come honestly to this analysis, the conclusions should be rather obvious.

Dwhy is it so crucial to have your own national assets and make your country's production in all areas of production? The answer is simple. A country that disposes of national assets, including the revenues it has generated to the economy of the country and ceases to produce even simple products (and this is the case in IIIRP) no longer participate in global trade. Import possibilities and repayment possibilities of earlier credit commitments are steadily decreasing. The exchange (purchase) of goods and services by means of exchange (money) between citizens within the country besides ceases due to these goods and services and means of exchange (systematicly decreasing their real value) There's little and less. If the tendency to dispose of national assets and to restrict home production is constant, specified a country and its people are doomed to self-destruction. – Is that in demographics or not?

But as I see it, there's not only a fewer happy, at least:

Dariusz Kosiur