The decision-makers argue that the government task on alleged partnerships is intended to service only property matters or infirmary visits. This is not true, due to the fact that the proposed changes are intended to profoundly prioritize the legal and cultural scenery of Poland, contributing to promoting dangerous homosexual-gender ideology and yet accepting its demands, including the release of children to homosexual unions.
On October 18, the Government Legislative Centre website published a task called "Acts on Registered Partnerships", along with a full package of accompanying laws. The authors of the task are extremist politicians of the Donald Tusk coalition, who are represented by the alleged Minister for Equality – Katarzyna Kotula.
The authors of the task openly show that the only beneficiaries of the bill are homosexuals who want to pretend to be married. Politicians are not disturbed by the fact that the Constitution of Poland clearly speaks of "marriage as a union between a female and a man". Therefore, an attack on the natural and constitutional uniqueness of matrimony is to be added to the current government lawlessness. But this isn't the first attack.
A akin bill was attempted by the left at the time of Donald Tusk's erstwhile government, in a 2011 project. At the time, the ultimate Court firmly stated, in its opinion, that the creation of imitation matrimony is clearly contrary to the constitutional “no union between same-sex and marriage”. On the contrary, the legislature has a constitutional work to introduce "protective and promotional arrangements" for household and marriage, which are the institutions essential for the duration of the nation and state.
This time the attack on matrimony is unprecedented. With more than 300 pages, papers presume interference in more than 200 laws! Even the Police Act, the Border defender and the State Fire Department must comply with LGBT activists' demands. It's a complete prioritization of the legal system.
People with homosexual tendencies will be able to registry their relationships in civilian position offices, but also, like marriages, jointly settle taxes and even participate in caring for children adopted by partners. The fresh rules even regulate the name of a homosexual ‘partner’ of a biological parent. This is simply a completely open implementation of the request for homo adoption.
And that's just a small part of change. The package provides that "partner unions" will imitate the constitutional institution of matrimony in all aspect. They even regulate the rules of common residence (and forced removal), the collection of widow's household pension, alimony after the cessation of "partnership". They besides make imitations of the property community and let refugees to... bring their homosexual partners to Poland. By multiplying the absurdity of the planned amendment, you can point out the right of professional soldiers to... take homopartners on missions. Of course, it's on the taxpayers. It should not be surprising, therefore, that a fresh partner of the deceased will besides be privileged to have a position in the law of succession. Even if the parent didn't leave a will.
The Ordo Iuris Institute will shortly print the first analysis of the full two-stun-page project. Quoting the opinion of the ultimate Court from 13 years ago, we remind that, despite the fact that the authors of the task avoided the word "marriage", the full number of allowances granted to partners does not disagree importantly from those reserved in the Polish legal strategy exclusively for spouses, which constitutes a violation of the work imposed on the legislator to defend and advance matrimony as a permanent heterosexual relationship.
A conservative vote in the debate on the bill is all the more crucial due to the fact that on the list of organizations invited by the government to participate in the consultation, there are only organizations supporting LGBT activists, specified as the run Against Homophobia, the Association of Love No Excludes, the Rainbow household Foundation or the Trans-Fusion Foundation.
In order to powerfully argue the impact on the natural, constitutionally-confirmed definition of matrimony as part of the public consultation of the project, we will engage in it by submitting our comments. At the same time, we encourage all life, matrimony and household organisations to participate in the consultation. We cannot let them to be dominated by the message of radicals.
Behind the revolutionary bill stands the large global capital. The same who sends platforms and workers to the Parades of Equality, and in controlled media censors all criticism of LGBT ideology – supporting even transitive mutilation of children and vulgar, pornographic education in schools. If we stay passive, the LGBT lobby will change hundreds of laws and, throughout the legal system, root privileges arising solely from homosexual practices and liely align them with the depth of the social and cultural function of marriage.
The extremist left has been utilizing the salami method for years. The demolition of normality is done by slow delimiting subsequent slices of legal order. By conducting revolutionary changes in tiny steps, radicals limit social opposition. As a result, the revolution has consistently moved forward. The formalisation of “partner unions” is an entrance to a one-way street. At the end of it is full homo-adopted, ideological censorship and a ban on criticism of LGBT lobby demands.
The request to defend household and matrimony must besides be reminded of conservative parties. In early October, the fast reaction of conservative public opinion, including our lawyers, led to the withdrawal from the Sejm (in just a fewer hours!) striking down the marital privileges of the bill, tabled by Sławomir Mentzen. The task justified the change in "discrimination against homosexuals" by forgetting that the privilege of matrimony has its natural and constitutional basis!
After a fast publicisation of the case and broad presentation of arguments, in just a fewer hours Members of the Confederation of the Polish Crown Grzegorz Braun – a associate of the Confederation – declared to retreat their signatures to the project, resulting in the bill being withdrawn without the support of 15 MPs. Parliamentarians of the Crown explained that they did not get to know the task in item and thought it was just about taxation cuts.
Dissemination of this cognition is all the more crucial due to the fact that Poland is in a powerful fertility crisis today. Knowing the consequences of the demographic crisis, Ordo Iuris has been on the side of a strong household since the beginning – treating as a model mention point a full and multi-children family, based on a unchangeable marriage.
In his reports Ordo Iuris has consistently shown that not only material but primarily cultural causes are behind the demographic crisis. We discussed this issue extensively at last year's global conference "Cultural aspects of pro-family policy – the addition or basis of an effective prescription for the demographic crisis", in which scientists and representatives of think-tanks from Poland, Hungary, large Britain and the USA spoke. We argued extensively at the time why effective pro-demographic policy is based on the promotion of matrimony and family, which have a affirmative impact on human life.
Besides, global force on Poland is not only the subject of the formalization of monosexual compounds, but besides the designation of homoadoption. The European Union has been working for a long time on a draft regulation to force all countries of the community to recognise homo-adopted in 1 of the EU countries. Unfortunately, the Ministry of Justice led by Adam Bodnar in June expressed support for this initiative, claiming that it is meant to aid defend the fundamental rights of children.
In its analysis of the draft EU regulation, the Institute emphasises that it is an example of an excess of the powers of European Union bodies. civilian position government falls within the exclusive competence of the associate States of the Community. The current Treaty provisions (Article 81(3) TFEU) clearly warrant to associate States a circumstantial "vet right" against any effort to impose on them, in the form of any possible Union legislation, "aspects of household law having cross-border effects". The removal of the request of unanimity is only now a request made by the European Commission and supported by the European Parliament in its resolution of 22 November 2023, as part of the broader centralist tendencies against which the Ordo Iuris Institute warned in this year's publication "Why do we request sovereignty?" (Amendments 103 and 104).
Source: Jerzy Kwasniewski / Ordo Iuris Institute
Łukasz Warzecha: We don't request partnerships
![[MC DATA] Experts sound the alarm. The vast majority of Poles do not yet have a PESEL number withheld](https://dzienniknarodowy.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/dowod_osobisty_c_mondaynews_pl.jpg?v=1751964025)
