We request to talk about the Union

Dear writers, we request to talk about the Union. Metaphorically, of course, do not consider it an invitation to comment.

Two years ago, you agreed with us at least 1 thing, that a place in the Union is simply a Polish state ration. You underestimated the threats due to the fact that you believed they wouldn't launch Article 7.

You besides believed at the time that Macerewicz's squad would explain the "attack" of Smolensk, that the parliament committee would find evidence of the PO's engagement in the Amber Gold scandal, that PiS would build highways faster and cheaper. But it's a digression.

The threat of EU sanctions is increasingly real. Even comparatively mild sanctions will trigger a recession, after which Poland will no longer be able to afford 500+.

I do not know how much Twitter and Youtube are responsible, but the debate in Poland present comes down to a silly mouth. The alleged "our" side besides applies unfortunately, so delight let go of comments like "a Holdys with Gierty".

I know your reps due to the fact that I'm watching you on the Internet. But I am curious to see how much you truly believe that the written improvement of the judiciary is consistent with the solutions adopted in the West.

If you illustrate this with any examples, it's shamelessly manipulated. You compose that in America, the president appoints judges of the ultimate Court (and you ignore that he cannot revoke them).

You compose that elsewhere judges are appointed by the Justice Ministers of the national states – and you ignore that this is simply a twelve men from different parties.

The Union and the Venice Commission are not about method details, but about avoiding a situation where the government can punish judges or put force on them. In democracies, it is usually avoided that the ruling organization coexists with judges appointed mostly by individual else.

Judicial independency is by itself not a warrant of efficient action. Of course! Your twitter counterarguments are polemics with the thesis that no 1 is preaching ("and this judgement was so unjust," etc.).

It is simply that all democratic state must have (a) any form of constitutional judiciary, independent of executive and legislative authority, (b) judges irrevocably dismissed by the ruling party. Let us not question why this is so and whether it is good; but it seems to you that conditions (a) and (b) are simply required.

PiS first broke (a), then (b). It will not have allies among democratic states (most in Russia or China).

"Orban will veto"? I can't believe you believe that.

Even if they repeat it to you on the bar in TVP INFO, all your idols – Max Kolonko, Grzegorz Braun, Jerzy Zięba Hidden Therapy, and then retweet Gmyz and Ziemkiewicz will be revived on jutub. You're right.

Orban is simply a rotating ally. He supports whoever gives him more. Whatever currency – rubles, dollars, yen, euro. Kaczyński is incapable to offer him adequate peers to bid on Brussels' offer.

Orban is simply a master of the game of "I will step down to you on this matter, as you will support me in that one." It is simply a pathological but logical consequence of a recipe for the unification of Europe, formulated by 1 of the founding fathers, Jean Monnet: "small moves around which interest groups will unite".

And speaking of the founders: you frequently compose that “they rotation over in their graves due to the fact that they only want an economical community.” That's not true.

Among the founding fathers, Robert Schuman, Paul-Henri Spaak, Jean Monnet, Altiero Spinelli and Winston Churchill spoke openly about the federation ("United States of Europe"). There's most likely more, but I know that for sure.

Maybe you know any another people's statements. the founding fathers, Deciding to reject the Federation. So give examples (this is the only kind of comment you would welcome here).

I don't think you will. As 1 believes in the Hidden Therapy, in the Turbo Slavic Lechicki Empire, in vaccines that induce autism and controlled WTC demolition, he usually believes in the PiS. You're just unreflexively copying net nonsense.

Yeah, I know, they're like that in CODE. Well, I have a akin opinion of them. due to the fact that this isn't about who I like more, it's about the fact that you're gonna cut off our finances. And you've been fooled for 2 years that there's no specified risk.

Maybe the Lechithic Empire. due to the fact that in the real world, unfortunately, he is.