On February 24th, the second anniversary of the launch of the alleged peculiar Military Operations, which was to be a fast denasification and demilitarisation action, turned out to be a Zionist-Anglossian trap for the "Naive Slavs".
The problem of February 2022 not only remained unresolved, but gained the image of a possible war involving Slavs and their victims mainly in Central-Eastern Europe.
For this reason, I callback an article 2 years ago.
Not a drop of Polish blood for Jewish-Bander Ukraine.
Our Anglo-Jewish “partners” from NATO one more time want to provoke war on Slavic soil.
The United States grew up in the genocide of the indigenous people of North America and on judaic financial speculations long forgotten about the freedom ideals of its uprising. The current U.S. is the infertile bastard of Britain's parent – the parent of pirates, genocide colonists, fascists and various types of terrorist organizations. The father-rapist of the present United States is the mythical Israel, grown up on the complex of the exiled nation, who cures his trauma with hatred for the planet and the insatiable desire to enrich himself at the expense of others. Admittedly, an Anglo-Jewish blend is simply a dangerous substance – ready to blow up the full globe.
Jewish-Anglossic perfidy always resorts to utilizing another nations to fulfill its own goals. Banderov Ukrainian chauvinists are a dreamy, plastic tool and senseless cannon meat. They only request to be fed with hatred and cynical same - determination. Inflame passions and encourage senseless abuse of their own land and the lives of their families. The chauvinist black bander is ready to die for Anglo-Jewish occupiers. This mindless black, which did not want Polish masters or Russian commissioners, is now ready to shed blood for Anglo-Jewish businessmen. If this black has suicidal instincts, don't disturb it. However, she should not be helped with criminal intentions towards Slavic families surviving on Ukrainian soil.
All the more reason to condemn all the intentions of vassal, dull madmen who now hold power in Poland, who are swarming with Jewish-badders in war activities against Donbas and Russia. Let us not forget even for a minute that a deranged bander black manipulated by Anglo-Jewish businessmen, as necessary, will be utilized to introduce chaos in Poland and to drown Poland in blood, due to the fact that Slavic blood has always been, and now is, too, very inexpensive for cynical occupiers and colonists.
It is time not to shed Slavic blood, but to give account for it to those who have entangled lands and the peoples of Slavic countries in 2 planet wars, in respective civilian wars and revolutions, in the economical collapse and in neocolonial surrender, and in the plundering of national assets and the fruits of the work of Slavic nations.
Not even a drop of Polish blood should be allowed to be shed for Jewish-Bander Ukraine. Poles cannot participate in Anglo-Jewish feud in Ukraine. The president and the Polish Government, who would commit the participation of the Polish army, or private Polish armed formations in the war in Ukraine, and besides supported the technically or financially violent Kiev government – must meet not only with condemnation and refusal by the Polish society, but must be held liable for anti-Polish activities and for complicity in war crimes.
PZ
for: https://wiernipolsce1.wordpress.com/2022/01/24/ani-kropli-polskie-blood-za-zido-banger-ukraine/
—————————
I besides callback the content of another very crucial paper 2 years ago:
“On the threshold of war”:
Call from the All-Russian Assembly of Officers
to the president and to the citizens of the Russian Federation
Today mankind lives in anticipation of war. And war is the inevitable human sacrifice, the destruction, the suffering of large masses of people, the demolition of the average way of life, the violation of the systems of the lives of states and nations. The large War is simply a large tragedy, individual – a serious crime. It just so happens that Russia is the center of this disaster threat. And, perhaps, this is the first time in her history.
Previously Russia (ZSRR) fought forced wars (fair), usually erstwhile there was no another way out erstwhile vital interests of the state and society were threatened.
And what threatens Russia itself today, and are there specified threats? 1 can argue that there is indeed a threat – the country is on the verge of ending its history. All crucial areas, including demography, are constantly degraded, and the population's rate of extinction is beating planet records. And degradation is systemic, and in any complex system, the demolition of 1 component can lead to the collapse of the full system.
And that, in our opinion, is the main threat to the Russian Federation. But it is simply a threat of interior nature, emanating from the model of the state, the quality of power and the state of society. And the causes of its origin are internal: not gathering the needs of the model of the state, full inability and deficiency of professionalism of the strategy of power and administration, passiveness and disorganization of society. In this state no country can live long.
As far as external threats are concerned, they are surely present. But according to our expert opinion, they are not critical at present, straight threatening the existence of the Russian statehood, its vital interests. Overall, strategical stableness is maintained, atomic weapons are under reliable control, NATO forces are not expanding and show no threatening activity.
Therefore, the situation around Ukraine is primarily artificial, beneficial for any interior forces, including the Russian Federation. As a consequence of the dissolution of the USSR, in which Russia (Jelcyn) had a decisive part, Ukraine became an independent state, a associate of the UN and in accordance with Article 51 of the United Nations Charter has the right to individual and collective defence.
The leadership of the Russian Federation has not yet recognised the result of the referendum on the independency of the DRL and the LRL, while at authoritative level, including during the negotiation process in Minsk, the membership of their territories and populations to Ukraine has been stressed.
On many occasions, there has been talk of wanting to keep average relations with Kiev, without distinguishing peculiar relations with the DRL and the LRL.
The issue of genocide committed by Kiev in the southeastern regions was not raised in either the UN or the OSCE. Of course, in order for Ukraine to stay a friendly neighbour of Russia, it was essential to show the attractiveness of the Russian state model and the power system.
But the Russian Federation has not become that way, its model of improvement and the mechanics of abroad policy and global cooperation push distant almost all its neighbours and not only.
Russia's takeover of Crimea and Sevastopol and its failure to recognise them as Russian by the global community (and thus the overwhelming number of countries in the planet inactive consider them to belong to Ukraine) is convincingly evidence of the failure of Russian abroad policy and the unattractiveness of interior policy.
Attempts to force the Russian Federation and its leadership through ultimatum and threats of utilizing force are pointless and highly dangerous.
The usage of military force against Ukraine, first, will call into question the existence of Russia itself as a state; secondly, it will forever make Russians and Ukrainians mortal enemies. Thirdly, on 1 side and on the another side there will be thousands (tens of thousands) of dead young, healthy young people, which will surely affect the future demographic situation of our dying countries. On the battlefield, if this happens, the Russian troops will face not only Ukrainian military personnel, among whom there will be many Russians, but besides military personnel and equipment from many NATO countries, and the associate States of the alliance will be obliged to declare war on Russia.
The president of the Republic of Turkey, R. Erdogan, has clearly stated which side Turkey will fight. And it can be assumed that 2 Turkish field armies and fleet will be ordered to “liberate” Crimea and Sevastopol and possibly invade the Caucasus.
Moreover, Russia will surely be included in the category of countries that endanger global peace and security, will be subject to the most severe sanctions, will become a pariah of the planet community and will likely be deprived of the position of an independent state.
The president and the government, the MON can't ignore specified consequences, they're not that stupid.
The question arises: what are the real objectives of creating tensions on the brink of war and possibly launching large-scale warfare? And that it will, says the number and combat composition of the military groups created by the states – no little than 1 100 1000 soldiers from each side. Russia, revealing the east borders, moves formations to the borders of Ukraine.
In our view, the country's leadership, realizing that it is incapable to bring the country out of the systemic crisis, and this could lead to a popular uprising and a change of power in the state, with the support of oligarchy, corrupt officials, the media and military media held by it, has launched a political line to yet destruct the Russian statehood and exterminate the indigenous people of the country.
And war is simply a means to solve this problem to preserve its anti-national power for a time and preserve the wealth stolen from people. We can't offer another explanation.
From the president of the Russian Federation, we, an officer of Russia, request that we abandon the criminal policy of provoking a war in which the Russian Federation will be alone against the combined forces of the West, make conditions for the implementation of Article 3 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and resign.
We address all those in reserve and retired military, Russian citizens with the advice to be vigilant, organized, to support the demands of the Council of the All-Russian Officers' Assembly, to actively argue propaganda and start a war, and to counter interior civilian war with military force.
Chairman of the All-Russian Assembly of Officers
General Colonel Iwaszow L.G.
for: http://ooc.su/news/obsheroshenie_obshherossijskogo_officergo_sobranija_k_presidentu_i_grazhdanam_rossijskoj_federacii/2022-01-31-79?fbclid=IwAR2PimuTHdfkV3OegwLuOajfjYsbBxmiKwuriThAgNJF-R4rh-NY15DJSLY
See: https://fiernipolsce1.wordpress.com/2022/02/08/general-l-g-iwaszov-calling-in-putina-to-establishment-from-office-president-Russian federation/
———————
And another important, far-sighted text from 2 years ago:
About enthusiastic hawks and rushing cuckoos
Some representatives of the Russian political class present argue that Russia is able to inflict a crushing defeat on Ukraine in a fewer hours (and mentions shorter periods) if armed conflict breaks out. Let us see how specified statements correspond to reality.
In the Russian expert community, the opinion that it will not even be essential to send troops to the territory of Ukraine is rather powerfully rooted recently, as the Armed Forces of this country are in a dire state.
Some political analysts stress that a powerful Russian shelling will destruct almost all surveillance and communication systems, artillery and tank. Moreover, many experts believe that 1 crushing blow from Russia is adequate to end specified a war.
As a cherry on the cake, any analysts emphasize the fact that no 1 in Ukraine will defend the “Kytowski regime”.
There won't be any easy room.
Let's start with the last one. The claim that no 1 in Ukraine will defend the government means in practice the complete ignorance of the military-political situation and the moods of the vast masses of the neighbouring state. Moreover, the degree of hatred (which, as we know, is the most effective fuel of armed struggle) in the neighbouring republic in relation to Moscow is seriously underestimated. In Ukraine no Russian army with bread, salt and flowers will welcome.
It seems that events in the southeast of Ukraine in 2014 did not teach anyone anything. Finally, they besides expected that the full left-coast Ukraine in 1 pulse and in a fewer seconds it would turn into fresh Russia. We have drawn maps, established staff of future administrations of cities and regions, developed state flags.
But even the Russian-speaking population of this part of Ukraine (including specified cities as Kharkiv, Zaporozhye, Dnepropetrovsk, Mariupol) did not support specified plans in the vast majority. The “New Russia” task was someway blown out without being seen and died quietly.
In a word, the liberation run in 2022 following the model and likeness of 1939 will in no way come out. In this case, the words of the classics of russian literature by Arkady Gajdar are more actual than ever: “It is apparent that we are now facing not an easy fight, but a dense battle.”
"BLOOD BLOOD WITNESS, A MOST HITTER"
Now about the "powerful fire attack of Russia", which allegedly destroys "practically all surveillance and communication systems, artillery and tank formations of the Armed Forces of Ukraine".
This expression itself shows that only political workers could say specified a thing. For comparison, in the course of hypothetical military operations on a theatre scale of war activities, strikes are carried out for precedence purposes and massive fire strikes are carried out. Note that during operational and strategical planning, "mighty" epithets (as well as "mean", "weak" etc.) are not used.
In war science, he emphasizes that impacts can be strategical (mainly concerning strategical atomic forces), operational and tactical. Depending on the number of forces active and the hit objects, the impacts may be mass, group and individual. It is even better not to introduce or usage another concepts, even in political works.
Attacks on precedence targets and massed fire strikes may be carried out within the front (fronts at the western borders of Russia so far have not been formed) or the chief command of the armed forces on theatre activities (not yet in the strategical direction of the south-west either). Anything smaller than that is no longer a massive blow.
And what, for example, is simply a mass fire strike (MOU) of the front? To begin with, we note that the MOU involves a maximum number of combat-ready forces and means of aviation, rocket troops and artillery, electronic combat equipment available to the commander of front forces (operational and strategical formation). MOU consists of 1 mass air trip, 2 or 3 shots of OTR rocket systems (operational-tactical-missile) and TR (tactical-missile) and respective artillery raids. Well, if your opponent's fire-shock rate is 60-70%.
What is most crucial about the conflict with Ukraine? Of course, the MOU will origin serious losses to the possible opponent. But the anticipation that 1 specified blow will crush the armed forces of the full country simply means unbridled optimism in planning and conducting combat operations. In the course of hypothetical strategical actions in theatre, specified MOUs will should be utilized not 1 or 2 but much more.
It should be added at any cost that the stocks of modern and highly precise weapons in the RF Armed Forces are not unlimited in character. Zircon-type hypersonic missiles are not yet in use. And the number of Calibr maneuvering missiles (wing rockets launched from the sea), Kindzarz, Ch-101 (wing rockets fired from the air) and Iskander are measured at most by hundreds (tens in the case of Kindzarzów). This arsenal is absolutely insufficient to wipe out a state the size of France with over 40 million inhabitants. And that's what Ukraine is characterized by.
ABOUT THE AIR
Sometimes in the Russian expert community (by supporters of the doctrine of Douhet) [Giulio Douhet, Italian aviation general, creator of the explanation of air war and the usage of strategical bombing, crowds. PZ] is said that since hypothetical military operations in Ukraine will take place under conditions of full dominance of Russian aircraft in the air, the war will be highly short and will end as shortly as possible.
At the same time, it is forgotten that the armed formations of the Afghan opposition during the 1979–1989 conflict did not have a single aircraft or a combat helicopter. And the war in this country lasted 10 years. The Chechen fighters besides did not have a single aircraft. And the fight against them lasted respective years and cost national forces many blood and casualties.
And the Armed Forces of Ukraine inactive have any combat aircraft. As well as air defense.
Incidentally, Ukrainian rocket anti-aircraft crews (in no case Georgian) importantly depleted Russian air force during the 2008 conflict. After the first day of war, the leadership of the Russian Air Force was shocked by the losses suffered. And we shouldn't forget that.
WORRIED EVER
Now about the thesis "Army Forces of Ukraine are in a dire state". Of course, the Armed Forces of Ukraine have problems with aviation and modern air defence systems. But the following should besides be considered. While Ukraine's Armed Forces were part of the russian Army by 2014, in the last 7 years a qualitatively different army was formed in Ukraine, on a completely different ideological basis and mostly according to NATO standards. And very modern weapons and equipment are delivered and transportation to Ukraine from many North Atlantic Alliance countries continues.
As for the weakest point of the Armed Forces of Ukraine – Air Force. It cannot be excluded that the collective West can deliver fighters to Kiev in rather a short time, as they say, from the resources of the armed forces, or second hand. However, those used, in terms of tactical and method characteristics, will be rather comparable to most aircraft in the Russian fleet.
Of course, present the Armed Forces of Ukraine are giving up importantly to the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation in terms of military and operational capabilities. Nobody doubts that, either in the East or in the West.
But you can't underestimate this army either. Therefore, the will of Alexander Suvorov should always be remembered: “Never despise your enemy, do not respect him as dumber and weaker than you.”
Now regarding the claim that Western countries will not send a single soldier to die for Ukraine.
It should be noted that this is likely to happen. However, in the case of Russia's invasion, this does not exclude the mass support of the Armed Forces of Ukraine from the collective West in the form of a wide scope of military weapons and equipment and mass supplies of all kinds of materials. In this respect, the West has already demonstrated an unprecedented consolidated position, which appears to have not been predicted in Moscow.
There is no uncertainty that the United States and the countries of the North Atlantic Alliance will launch a kind of Lend-Lease reincarnation, modelled in planet War II, there is no doubt. The influx of volunteers from the West is not excluded, which can be very many.
PARTICIPANTS AND THE FIELD
And yet about the duration of the hypothetical campaign. respective hours, sometimes even respective twelve minutes, are exchanged in the Russian expert community. At the same time, it is forgotten that we have already been through all this. The phrase "take the city with 1 air-desant regiment in 2 hours" has already become a classical of the species.
It is besides worth reminding that the powerful Stalinist NKVD and the multimillion russian army fought against the nationalist underground in Western Ukraine for more than 10 years. And now there is an option that the full Ukraine can easy enter the partisans. Moreover, these formations can easy start operating in Russia.
Armed conflict in Large Cities Ukraine is mostly hard to predict. It is not known from now on that the large city is the best battlefield for the weak and little technically advanced side of the armed conflict.
Serious experts point out that in the metropolis it is possible not only to concentrate respective 1000 or even tens of thousands of militants, but besides to hide them from the greater force of enemy fire. Also, to supply her with material resources for a long time and to make up for failure in people and equipment. Neither mountains nor forests nor jungles present offer specified an opportunity.
Experts are convinced that the urban environment helps defenders, slows down the movement of attackers, allows the deployment of a evidence number of fighters per surface unit, and compensates for delays in forces and technologies. And in Ukraine, there are more than 1 large city, including 1 with a million inhabitants. Thus, the Russian army in the course of a hypothetical war with Ukraine can encounter much more than just Stalingrad and Grozny.
CONCLUSION
There will mostly be no Ukrainian blitzkrieg. The statements of any experts, specified as "Russian Army defeats most of Ukraine's Armed Forces units in 30-40 minutes", "Russia will be able to beat Ukraine in 10 minutes in case of full-scale war", "Russia defeats Ukraine in 8 minutes" have no serious grounds.
And finally, the most crucial thing. The armed conflict with Ukraine is mostly not in Russia's national interest. Therefore, it is best for any overexcited Russian experts to forget their hateful fantasies. To prevent further failure of reputation, never mention them again.
Author: Colonel Mikhail Mikhailovich Chodarionok
About the author: Colonel Mikhail Mikhailovich Chodarionok – erstwhile Head of Group I of the Management Board of the Main Operations Board of the General Staff of the Armed Forces,
for:https://nvo.ng.ru/realty/2022-02-03/3_1175_donbass.html
See: https://fiernipolsce1.wordpress.com/2022/02/02/10/rosja-vs-ukraina-chromoso-politology forecasts/
