author:Zbigniew Jacniacki
____________________
But we don't mind. Or we don't know anything about it. We are disorganized, and that is why we are abolishing the force of the organized group.
The United Nations Charter in Article 2, point 1 states: "The organisation is based on the rule of sovereign equality of all its members". This is the basis – countries in the UN are to be equal and sovereign, without anyone above them. Chapter VIII (Articles 52 to 54) adds that regional organisations, specified as the EU, must act under the supervision of the safety Council on matters of peace and security. However, the European Union breaks both these principles: it takes sovereignty from its members and ignores the UN. The problem started with the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), which was besides illegal, and the EU has taken over its mechanisms contrary to the Charter through legal succession.
I'm going to show you these examples.
ECSC - Illegal beginning
The ECSC, founded in 1952, had already violated the UN Charter. Its advanced Authority had power over the coal and steel sector and associate States were losing their sovereignty in these areas. In 1964, the Court of Justice in Costa v. ENEL confirmed that ECSC law is superior to national law – it is simply a manifest violation of Article 2, point 1 of sovereign equality. In addition, the ECSC has not consulted the safety Council, which contradicts Article 53, requiring the Council's consent to coercive measures.
The UN states, like France and Germany, formed the ECSC, broke the Charter due to the fact that they gave up sovereignty without the right to do so.
EU – conflict with sovereignty
The EU took over the rule of supremacy from the ECSC and went on.
Poland wanted to defend its constitution in 2021, but the EU threatened with penalties erstwhile the Constitutional Court challenged EU legislation. Hungary lost funds in 2022 for judicial improvement – Brussels imposed its will.
Article 2, point 1 of the Charter requires equality, and here we have a hierarchy: the EU over the countries.
Greece had to accept EU orders under the threat of bankruptcy in 2010-2015 – economical sovereignty has disappeared.
This shows that the EU, like the ECSC, places itself above members, which is illegal against the UN Charter.
Conditional mechanics – interference without UN approval
The EU has come up with a conditionality mechanism: you are not listening to Brussels, you are losing money.
Poland did not receive billions from the National Recovery Plan in 2023 for changes in courts, Hungary in 2022 similarly.
This is an economical compulsion, and Article 53 of the Charter says that specified action requires the approval of the safety Council. The EU does not have one, acting alone, breaking Chapter VIII. In addition, Article 2, point 7, prohibits interference in interior affairs and the EU interferes with the judiciary or state budgets. The ECSC did not have specified tools, but gave the EU the basis for this illegal power.
EU sanctions – outside the control of the Council
The EU imposes sanctions without asking the UN. After 2014, she struck Russia behind the Crimea, but did not receive the approval of the safety Council, although Article 53 requires authorisation. Similarly, sanctions for Poland and Hungary under the "law of the government" are coercive measures, and the Council does not know about them. Article 54 of the Charter requires the Council to be informed of safety activities, but the EU does not. The ECSC did not apply sanctions, but the EU, assuming its superiority, created a strategy contrary to the UN.
Brexit and Ireland – sovereignty under pressure
The United Kingdom left the EU in 2020 due to the fact that it wanted sovereignty, but the EU made the process hard with trade threats – this is proof that members' ties. Ireland rejected the Lisbon Treaty in 2008 and the EU forced it to vote again in 2009 under pressure. Article 2, point 1 of the Charter gives emergence to self-determination and the EU takes it away. Countries outside the EU, like Norway, are free – equality is simply a fiction in the EU.
Italy – deficiency of self-control
In 2018, Italy wanted a larger deficit, but the EU threatened with sanctions. Rome bowed, losing financial sovereignty.
This is another breach of Article 2, point 1, states are not equal erstwhile Brussels dictates the conditions. The ECSC limited only coal and steel,
But the EU has extended this logic to everything.
Chapter VIII of the Charter-EU ignores the UN
Article 52:
‘Nothing in this Charter precludes the existence of regional groupings or organisations to deal with matters relating to the maintenance of global peace and security, provided that specified groups or organisations and their activities comply with the objectives and principles of the United Nations.’
Member States should first effort to resolve regional disputes through specified organisations before they turn to the safety Council.
"The safety Council supports the improvement of peaceful settlement of local disputes through specified regional organisations, either at the initiative of the States afraid or as a consequence of specified organisations."
Article 53:
"The safety Council shall, where appropriate, usage specified regional organisations in coercive actions based on its authority; however, no coercive action shall be taken on the basis of regional agreements or by regional organisations without the authority of the safety Council."
Exception: Action against countries considered enemies during planet War II (today out).
Article 54:
‘The safety Council should be full informed at any time of actions taken or planned under regional agreements or by regional organisations to keep global peace and security.’
The UN Charter in Chapter VIII (Articles 52 to 54) states that regional organisations, specified as the EU, can act for peace and security, but under the supervision of the safety Council. Article 53 requires the approval of the Council to act on coercion, specified as sanctions, and Article 54 requires the Council to be informed of specified plans. However, the EU acts alone. Sanctions on Russia after 2014 or on Poland and Hungary under the conditionality mechanics were not authorized by the safety Council. The EU is besides developing defence policy (PESCO), not reporting this in item to the Council. This is simply a violation of the Charter due to the fact that the EU is putting itself above the UN, alternatively of being subject to it, as required by Chapter VIII.
The ECSC was besides not subject to the Council, and the EU inherited this independency by becoming an organisation contrary to the Charter at 2 levels: sovereignty and UN supervision.
Legal succession – illegal roots
The ECSC expired in 2002 and the EU took over its rules through succession. If the ECSC was illegal – due to the fact that it took sovereignty
and ignored the Council - the EU, based on this, is besides illegal. EU supporters will say that countries themselves enter the EU,
but Greece or Ireland show pressure, not choice. The Charter does not let us to surrender sovereignty or act against UN rules.
Summary
The EU is illegal due to the fact that it breaks the UN Charter: Article 2, point 1 on sovereign equality and Chapter VIII on the supervision of the safety Council. The ECSC started this problem in 1952 and the EU developed it. Poland, Hungary, Greece, Brexit, Ireland, Italy, sanctions on Russia - everywhere we see the EU's sovereignty over sovereignty and the UN. In order to be legal, the EU would gotta give power to the countries and submit to the Council.
We have a strategy that goes against the UN Charter from the beginning.
___________________________
Why our powerlessness – can we be free from it?
But we don't mind. Or we don't know anything about it. We are disorganized, and that is why we are abolishing the force of the organized group.
A.Hiter:“The winners will not be asked if they are telling the truth” (from the briefing of the commanders in Obersalzberg, 22 VIII 1939)
This infirmity problem is not new, it is as old as the world, and it is governed by the same mechanisms. This was the case in ancient Greece, where democracy was born, but only one-third of the population had the right to vote in Athens. It was even worse during the German business 1939-45 – people were politely standing against the wall to be shot – A.Hitler brought peace to the planet – and although he was unaware of it, he prepared a subsoil under the EU according to a draft of financiers from the US, Fed owners – and fought the deadly enemy of the West: socialism and had the blessing of the Roman Curia, which besides laid the foundation for the EU.
Today we have a democracy of Zionist, Jewish, financier, erstwhile the real power does not even belong to 1/3 of the total, but to a tiny promilium – a minimum, but a degenerated number rules a immense majority.
Therefore, the mechanisms of democracy have not improved, but the mechanisms of oppression of societies, with oppression not always having to affect physical coercion, with brutal force—these are utilized only in exceptional situations erstwhile average "democracy" fails. Under average conditions, to keep societies in a state of enslavement, it was usually adequate for religion, which present is supported by the universal media and education – the indoctrinated people politely set up, not against the wall, due to the fact that this was replaced by an electoral urn and voted against each another with awareness and unchanging hope that they were doing well.
It may be that average “democracy” fails, as in Denmark in 1992.
.
Denmark, June 1992. "The Danish reject the Maastricht Treaty in referendum – they do not want to build the European Union. The mass media propaganda of attacks and political blackmail begins. After 11 months, the Danes were forced to re-conference. The Maastricht Treaty is adopted by a minimum majority – fraud of power? The Danes are certain of that. They go out on the streets in protest. Police besides go out to protesters – and shoot. He's shooting dense ammo. They're dead, they're hurt. Western democracy has been saved.
The President
_____________
