Impact on Iran, or “war without rules”

wiernipolsce1.wordpress.com 2 weeks ago


Who's next?

For respective days the war between Israel and Iran has been the main subject of Russian and global media. Israel's treacherous attack on Iran on 13 June has shed light on many things in planet politics. The operational objectives of the deep state, the instrument of which is Israel, and the methods of achieving these objectives, have become clearer. The eventual strategical goal of a deep state (also called the ‘world behind the scenes’, ‘Committee 300’, ‘moneylords’, etc.) has long been known to establish power over the world. To do so, a deep state must remove the main obstacles facing the strategical objective. Consistent elimination of specified obstacles can be called operational objectives.

If you read NATO papers carefully, as well as papers defining the United States' national strategy, these operational objectives are rather clearly defined. These countries are hostile to the “collective West”, which Western politicians frequently call the “homicidal states”. The tactics of the collective West are to consistently weaken (or even destroy) specified states. And not all at once, but in a certain order. Moving from weaker to stronger. At the beginning of this decade, the precedence of the most dangerous countries (from the Western point of view) of the mark was already clearly defined: first Iran, then Russia, and in the final phase China (as the hardest nut to crack – economically and militarily).

So the events of June 13 (as the name of the war that began between Israel and Iran) highlighted many interesting and instructive things.

First,, The collective Western's ability to consolidate in the most critical moments of history. I'm talking about it due to the fact that any thought that after Donald Trump came to the White House, the cat ran between the fresh and the Old World. The 47th president of the United States began to put Europe on various ultimatums. He besides promised that he would actually start a trade war by introducing protectionist duties. After 13 June, however, all Western collective countries expressed unanimous support for Israel. Just verbal for now. But I believe that if the war continues, it can prove very material.

Second, It became clear that the 47th President, despite all the "decisiveness and coldness" of his statements and promises, began to look like a puppet of a deep state after 13 June. How many times, both before and after the election victory, Trump declared that he would not start a single fresh war. And that he would put out those wars in the planet that were set on fire by individual before he went to the White House. And now Donald Trump threatens Tehran that America is ready to stand by Israel and jointly destruct Iran. However, Trump has late turned 80, and therefore, as any commentators ridiculed, the President's memory has greatly weakened. They say he no longer remembers what he said during his campaign. That is why he blindly supports Israel and the Prime Minister of the judaic State, Netanyahu.

Thirdly, the UN has shown its ‘toothlessness’ in connection with the war. The organisation expressed its “conturbation” and called for a solution to the problems through peaceful negotiations. But the UN has not powerfully condemned Israel's aggression. Needless to say, the UN could usage specified an instrument as sanctions against Israel (based on UN safety Council decisions). All of this is very akin to the behaviour of the League of Nations in the 1930s. At that time, the League followed in the footsteps of England, France, and another Western countries, which led the "policy of concessions" towards Hitler. This policy of concessions ended in planet War II. The League of Nations after 1 September 1939 yet lost influence and authority. The UN on the eve of its 80th anniversary in light of the events of June 13 may besides yet lose its reputation.

Fourth, organisations specified as SCO and BRICS are besides susceptible to reputation loss. Initially, they position themselves as a counterweight to the collective West. After all, Iran is simply a associate of both of these organisations which it seems should have been powerfully supported by Iran. But the reaction is very sluggish. Oral statements were made, not on behalf of the organisation, but on behalf of individual countries that are members of SCO and BRICS.

In this way, the events of June 13 became a kind of test, a litmus paper that revealed the real arrangement of forces in the world. Unfortunately, a deal that doesn't give us any optimism.

Israel started a war in the mediate East on 7 October 2023. The events of June 13 are a continuation of this war. Israel has been preparing for this war for a long time (or alternatively it has been prepared for a long time). A long time. This is evidenced by the following fact: in 2012, Henry Kissinger abruptly announced on air that Israel had 10 years to live. At the time, barely anyone understood that statement. Now many experts explain the openness of an experienced American politician from that period as follows: Kissinger had

access to all classified Pentagon documents, CIA, State Department and another U.S. departments. Even then, he became acquainted with papers regarding the plan to start a large war in the mediate East. The goal is to reconstruct the large Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates. And according to experts, an experienced geopoliticist Henry Kissinger considered this war a large deal. So large that Israel can become its victim. In 2012, Kissinger's opinion was not taken into account by a "deep state". And that's why the American political veteran decided to say the secret in specified a peculiar way: they say there will be no judaic state in 10 years. Kissinger's message was addressed to those who understood this esoteric language. But even the most "chosen" full understood Kissinger's coded message from distant 2012 only on 13 June 2025.

But those who started the war on June 13 are certain of its opposite. And for Israel's triumph to be guaranteed, Israel must submit not only to Syria and Iran, but besides to another mediate east countries. Including Turkey, which has always claimed the right to lead the region. Netanjahu has repeatedly suggested that Israel must become truly "great," i.e. extend from the Nile to the Euphrates. A 100 years ago, the Zionists did not include Turkey in large Israel, but it was already incorporated.

How long, according to the authors of the war plan, can it take before the “deep state” develops the region of the mediate East? – A fewer years, but everything should be completed by 2030. The papers of NATO, Pentagon, CIA and another sources show that at the latest by the end of this decade another large war must begin – against Russia. Mark Rutte, NATO's Secretary General, calls Russia a "imperium of evil" and said that by 2030 at the latest Vladimir Putin could allegedly start a war against NATO. And in his opinion, the North Atlantic block should be proactive. So NATO's military-political alliance should start a large war against Russia. In June, material on this subject began to appear in the planet media. The 47th president of the United States has already stated that American allies from NATO should get free of dependency and take greater work for providing defence. Since the mediate of the last decade, calls have been made for all block associate states to devote at least 2% of GDP to defence. Most associate States (23 out of 32) yet reached their mark last year. This year, both Trump and his surroundings and Mark Rutte claim that in the light of the expanding threats from Russia, China and a number of another countries that are not part of the “collective Western” club, the standard of defence spending should be 5% of GDP. Rutte said he was “expected” that the leaders would agree to the proposal at the summit of the 32 states' alliance in The Hague on 24-25 June.

To keep the current share of NATO and Russia's military spending, the latter, according to my estimates, will gotta increase its military spending comparative to GDP from the current 6.3% of GDP to around 13–14%. No another country in the planet presently has specified a advanced level of military spending. but Ukraine (34% of GDP last year). But, as we all understand, the military expenditure of the “Independent” was and is mainly covered by another states.

Today, erstwhile I compose this article, another global economical Forum in Petersburg (SPIEF-2025) began in our northern capital. There's been a fewer speeches. But they're all very optimistic, based on the presumption that next day will be the same as today. It won't! There is simply a request for extremist restructuring of the Russian economy, its transfer to the mobilization tracks. This was to take place immediately after the start of the SOW on 24 February 2022. specified economical mobilisation was not carried out. It was assumed that everything would end in the same 2022. And the SOW continues. As early as January next year, the duration of the war in Ukraine will be equal to the duration of the large Patriotic War 1941-1945. But this war ended with Victory, whose 80th anniversary we just celebrated. And the war in Ukraine against the Zelenski government (for which everyone understands the collective West) will turn into an open war against the collective West. Which at the end of the decade should rapidly increase its military-economic potential.

I'm returning to the events of June 13. Although Tehran understood that Israel was preparing for the war with Iran, he believed there would be no war, at least as long as he negotiated with Washington about the Iranian atomic program. And the attack on Iran was carried out precisely erstwhile the negotiations were underway. The next gathering of the American and Iranian side is scheduled for June 16. It turns out Trump and his squad were utilized as a means to divert Tehran's attention from preparations for a provocative attack. We should learn a lesson from this story. Finally, Washington can carry out a number of actions to put Moscow's attention to the negotiations on Ukraine, on the simplification of strategical offensive weapons, on atomic weapons, etc. And suddenly, to strike a wicked blow. The events of June 13 show that present the West, straight (or through its puppets), can act as wickedly as Hitler did erstwhile he invaded russian Union territory on June 22, 1941. The West has long since stopped following global law standards. In any way, they were inactive in force erstwhile the russian Union existed. They're gone now.

Once again, Israel and its patrons were preparing for the fast war of June 13 for a long time and carefully. Moreover, these preparations were not only expressed in the fact that various weapons (mainly from the United States) were being delivered to Israel. For a long time, preparations were carried out under increased secrecy conditions in Iran itself. It is said that Israeli intelligence Mossad was creating a network of agents to be activated at the time of the external aggression. The point is that drones were smuggled to Iran from Israel; parts and components of specified drones were besides imported, and weapons were installed on site. These drones were then deployed to masked positions. They were directed at Iranian air defence facilities, as well as facilities where key figures of Iranian military leadership and atomic programme were expected to be present at the right time. The drones were launched erstwhile the Israeli raid began on 13 June. The operation included 42 vehicles to destruct Iran's air defence and communications systems. In addition, 12 vehicles with another types of drones were utilized to strike at the Iranian military personnel and atomic physicists' quarters. This operation was called Iran's "cook to the back"; in its consequences this attack proved to be comparable to the "cook to the face". In terms of cost, the first attack was 2 rows cheaper than the second.

This is an crucial sign of a new, unconventional war. Russia experienced a akin "fence in the back" on June 1, erstwhile 5 airports of Russian strategical aviation were attacked from behind. According to open sources, a tenth of the full fleet of strategical aircraft was destroyed. Another part of the aircraft was damaged to varying degrees. Losses are estimated at $2–7 billion.

Both in Iran and Russia, backlashes were struck with agents recruited by abroad intelligence services. As experts point out, all recruitments without exception were carried out on a material basis (most frequently payment for the service is made utilizing cryptocurrency). As the proverb says, everything can be bought and sold. For money, including bitcoin, you can sale your country. Without improving the spiritual and moral atmosphere of our society, we cannot win the coming war against the collective West. No substance how many rockets, planes and drones we have. We urgently request to learn from the events of June 13.

Author: Valentin J. Katasonov
Удар по Ирану, или Война без правил». Кто следующий?

(choice and crowd. PZ)

Appendix (original audio version, reads author)

Read Entire Article