There are many prospects, but politics frequently speaks of the short and long term. If we recognise these 2 perspectives as criteria for assessing the impact of Donald Tusk's government, then in no case will we see clean profits, at most we can minimize losses, but that is not possible. Here and now forceful acquisition of the Constitutional Court only the ruling and most fanatical electorate of the coalition on December 13 are considered successful. The opposition stands naturally on the another side, but it is worth noting that this time we are talking about the full opposition from the organization Together, before both Confederations, to the Law and Justice.
However, Donald Tusk's current defeat is marked by something else, namely the attitude of the coalitions from Poland 2050 and PSL and the clear division among legal experts. If, on specified a fundamental, systemic issue, illegal actions of power are challenged, by part of the camp of power and lawyers who have criticised the “written tribunal” for years, but are now reacting sharply to the effort to forcefully take over the Constitutional Court, it is hard to talk of success. specified a division is of tremendous importance in the long term, specifically the next year's elections. The basic question is how does this translate into election results? Will the assassination of the Constitutional Court increase Donald Tusk's chances of holding power, or will it be the opposite? The short-term position mostly responds to these questions.
Since Donald Tusk was incapable to convince his own coalitions and he has alienated a large group of people, who have consistently criticised the reforms of the justice strategy carried out by the Law and Justice Service, it is improbable that voters will support the civilian Coalition massively. Under these circumstances, another question arises. Or as experienced a politician as Donald Tusk can't see what's happening And there's no awareness of the hazard of losing power? most likely that's what happens, doesn't see and doesn't know, which is the consequence of a known syndrome that many politicians get. erstwhile power is exercised in the belief that this condition will last forever, the first instinct of self-preservation dies, and this in turn leads to bravado. Donald Tusk and the most determined environment believed in what they call a cause. The reflection of the Constitutional Court is to be a proof of this act, replacing “100 specifics”, fuel of PLN 5.19 and all another failures.
The common knowing of this plan boils down to the well-known phrase: “over dead bodies to the target”, but planners have not precisely defined what bodies are about. There is no chance that the violent action carried out in violation of the law, and at the level of the coup, will be regarded by most of the public as a "re-establishment of the TC to citizens". This means that the first body will be the Constitutional Court itself, and around the corpse it is very hard to build a affirmative election campaign. Donald Tusk will effort to convince voters that it's not a dead body but a surviving proof of "practice", but no 1 will buy it but the most faithful of the faithful. It takes far more votes to keep power than the eight-star ones, so a coffin of the coalition will appear next to the TK coffin on 13 December.
In Poland we have insurgent traditions, but this should not be confused with the revolution. The uprisings were directed against external attackers, and the only "peaceful revolution" under the banner of "Solidarity" ended in a brutal consequence of the power which introduced martial law. Donald Tusk he did not carry out a peaceful revolution, he created associations with the martial law and for specified power Poles always issued the highest bills. No substance how further things proceed around the Constitutional Court, 1 thing is clear and in a short and long-term position Donald Tusk loses everything.
We don't believe in anyone, we don't believe in anything! We look at facts and draw conclusions!
