In the Sejm, a key decision was made which redefines the career way of 1 of the crucial professional groups in Poland. Members have passed a bill importantly amending the rules on the retirement of judicial bailiffs. Under the fresh regulations, they will be able to execute their profession until they are 70 years of age, not as yet, until 65 years of age. This is simply a breakthrough change which, according to the Ministry of Justice, aims to destruct unequal treatment within the legal professions. The amendment besides introduces crucial facilitations for those who are just entering the profession – asessors.
The majority of the parliament's decision sparked a heated debate and met with criticism from the opposition. Although the changes concern a narrow, specialised group, experts indicate that they can give emergence to a broader discussion on the flexibility of the pension strategy and the age of professional activity in Poland. The bill that passed through the Sejm is now waiting for the legislature to decide.
No more mandatory retirement at 65. What's changing?
The most crucial amendment introduced by the amendment of the law on bailiffs is extension of professional opportunities by 5 years. The erstwhile regulations were clear: the bailiff at age 65 had to make compulsory rest. Now this compulsion is gone. 234 Members voted in favour of these revolutionary changes, 174 voted against and 19 abstained.
What does this mean in practice? A chamberlain who reaches 65 will face a choice. He will be able to resign from office and quit as he has been. However, the fresh government gives it an additional flexible option – the anticipation of continuing to work until the age of 70. It is simply a law, not a duty, which gives the bailiffs greater freedom in planning their professional and individual future. This amendment does not prejudice the general principles of the pension strategy – the right to quit after reaching the universal retirement age remains intact.
Ministry of Justice: It was discrimination
The bill was prepared and brought to the Sejm by the Ministry of Justice. During the parliamentary work, Deputy Minister Arkadiusz Myrcha argued that the current regulations were unfair and constituted a form of discrimination against bailiffs against another legal professions. He stressed that there was no substantive basis for treating this group in a more restrictive manner.
To realize this argument, it is worth looking at the rules of another legal professions:
- Notaries: They leave office mandatoryly only after turning 70.
- Judges: They quit at the age of 65, but have the chance to apply for approval to proceed their post until they are 70.
- Lawyers and legal advisers: They don't exist. no statutory advanced age limitswhich would force them to end their professional activities.
Against this background, the compulsory cancellation of bailiffs at the age of 65 was a clear exception. The government argued that harmonising these principles is simply a step towards fair and equal treatment for all public trust professionals. The fresh law is so intended to destruct this "legislative anomaly".
An crucial change besides for the asessors. No more force on time
The amendment is not only a revolution for experienced bailiffs, but besides an crucial signal for young lawyers who aspire to this profession. The Act introduces a second, highly crucial change – abolishes a six-year time limit for the profession of asessor. So far, the asessor has had a maximum of six years to gain experience and apply for appointment as bailiff.
This time limit created tremendous pressure. Many young lawyers felt compelled to compete in competitions for the position of bailiff, even if they did not feel full prepared to take on specified a large responsibility. If they did not scope the deadline, their career way was questionable. The abolition of this regulation is simply a bow to the legal environment. Assessors will now be able to get practice without unnecessary rush, at their pace, which is to translate into better preparation for future bailouts.
The opposition criticizes change. What's next on the bill?
Despite the arguments of the Ministry of Justice, the task met with strong criticism from the opposition. erstwhile Deputy Minister of Justice, Sebastian Kaleta of Law and Justice, argued from the Sejm talker that the changes were unfavourable. He recalled that the improvement introduced by his group contributed to a crucial increase in the number of bailiffs and asessors, which in turn improved the availability of enforcement services for citizens. In his view, the fresh rules may undermine this balance.
Despite these votes of opposition, the majority of the Sejm voted the bill. However, this is not the end of the legislative process. According to the procedure, The bill will now go to the Senatewho has 30 days to consider it. The Higher Chamber may adopt the Act without amendment, make its own amendments or reject it in its entirety. The final form of the regulations that will find the future of professional bailiffs and asessors will be known in the coming weeks.
SEO tags: retirement age, bailiff, ministry of justice, parliament, bill, law, asessor
Alternative Title 1: A major change in law. Chambers will be able to work 5 years longer
Alternative Title 2: The government abolished the age limit for this professional group. No more discrimination?
Alternative Title 3: The Sejm voted. Work to 70 and no more limit for asessors. What does that mean?
More here:
The Sejm passed an crucial bill. This professional group will work until 70.
