The Gdańsk-Śródmieście territory Attorney's Office refused to initiate an investigation into 7 key themes concerning the takeover of the studio owned by Jerzy Ż. by the president-elect Karol Nawrocki and his spouse. This decision was taken despite the earlier initiation of a wider fraud investigation. Investigators have provided concrete reasons for refusal for each of the excluded threads, referring to the deficiency of any sign of a prohibited act or limitation of criminality. The prosecution's ruling is not yet final, which means that further legal steps can be taken.
The issue of surviving in Gdańsk, which became loud during the election campaign, is again gaining importance in the context of the prosecution's decision. It is simply a controversial acquisition of property from an older man, Jerzy Z., by Karol Nawrocki and his wife. Although an investigation into fraud was initiated on 13 June 2012-2017 to the detriment of Jerzy Z., we now find that any of the charges will not be investigated.
Which 1 of the D.A.'s notes excluded from the investigation?
Prosecutor of the territory Prosecutor's Office in Gdańsk, Mariusz Duszyński, confirmed that by a decision of 13 June, the prosecutor excluded 7 circumstantial threads from the case, refusing to analyse them. These included allegations made in 3 notices which were received by the prosecutors, including the Deputy Marshals of the legislature Magdalena Biejat and the president of Gdańsk.
Among the key issues that will not be examined were:
- The charge of bringing the Municipality of Gdańsk to an unfavourable regulation by misleading its typical erstwhile Jerzy Ż bought the apartment.
- Extortion of a message of untruth in a notarial act dated January 24, 2012. It is about the insidious introduction of the notary into mistake as to the payment by buyers (Nawrocki's marriage) of PLN 120 1000 for selling the apartment.
- Extortion of a message of untruth in the final notarial act of the sale of the flat dated March 6, 2017, besides by misleading the notary as to the payment of the full price at the preliminary contract in 2012.
- Making a false message in a notarial act on January 24, 2012 about paying PLN 120 1000 for the acquisition of Jerzy Ż.
- The submission in the 2017 notarial act of a false message of payment for the flat at the conclusion of the preliminary contract in 2012.
- The vulnerability of Jerzy Z. from 2012 to 2024 to the immediate danger of failure of life or severe injury to wellness by failing to comply with the work of care and assistance.
- Depreciation or depletion of the satisfaction of the creditor (Cities of the City of Gdańsk) on 14 May 2025 by granting the property of the flat in a situation threatening insolvency.
The EPPO shall state the reasons for its refusal: Limitation and absence of prohibited action
The D.A. made it clear why she refused to analyse the mentioned threads. In the case of allegations concerning the failure of the municipality, the false message in the 2017 notarial act of payment in 2012, and the vulnerability of Jerzy Ż. to danger, investigators considered that ‘the act does not contain any sign of a prohibited act’. This means that, in the assessment of the prosecution, the reported actions, even if they have occurred, do not meet the definition of criminal law.
Three another threads – 2 concerning the fraud of false statements in notarial files (2012 and 2017) and 1 concerning the false message in the 2012 notarial act on price payment – were refused to initiate an investigation due to ‘criminal limitation’. Polish law defines time limits after which criminal proceedings for a given act cannot be initiated or continued. In these cases, the D.A. concluded that these deadlines had passed.
The last of the excluded threads, concerning the possible failure to satisfy the creditor (community) in the future (date 14 May 2025) by giving up the apartment, besides met with a refusal. The prosecutors considered that specified action ‘is not a prohibited act’which may propose that the envisaged action (gift) in itself is not a crime in the context of the alleged charge.
What about the flat thing? Decision not valid
It should be stressed that the decision to refuse to analyse these 7 threads ‘not valid’As the D.A.'s spokesperson pointed out. This means that the parties who have submitted notices have the right to complain about this decision to the court. If the court considers the complaint, the D.A. will be required to analyse and analyse these threads.
Despite refusing to address these circumstantial 7 issues, investigation into a general suspicion of fraud made in 2012-2017 to the detriment of Jerzy Z. in connection with the acquisition of the flat is inactive being conducted. The prosecution will analyse another aspects of this case which have not been covered by the order to refuse to initiate an investigation. The resolution of this case is of public importance, given that it concerns the President-elect.
SEO tags: Karol Nawrocki, Housing scandal, Gdańsk Public Prosecutor's Office, Investigation, Initiation denied, Jerzy Z., Notary Act, Criminal Limitation, Google Discover
Alternative titles:
The D.A. refuses to analyse Nawrock's apartment. Is this going to be a dead end?
Nawrocki housing scandal: The prosecution will not analyse key themes. We know why.
Decision of Nawrocki D.A. These 7 charges will not be investigated.
Continued here:
The D.A. has decided on Nawrock's apartment. These 7 key threads won't investigate.
