The echo of the words on the fallen tv that the legal icon of the existing position, the "unbreakable" justice Igor Tuley's...
Nesthetics. The vast majority of commentators focused on the recipes of this "law defender" etc. on the KRS and the Constitutional Court. The "incorruptible" justice proposes that, as part of the restoration of the regulation of law (such as he and Tusk understands it) simply close the doors to the KRS's premises on 4 triggers and not let anyone in. And shut down the water and electricity at the Court.
Unfortunately. This openly aberrative message only shows the tremendous scales of revenge that have accumulated in the form of this "altorite" .
What else should scare us? Tuley's unaddicted question is what would happen if PiS returned to power, for he states:
– I think there would be no independent courts, independent judges, independent media, culture and art, and independent free elections and free citizens. I'm certain dismal lawyers, citizens and journalists would go to jail.
If individual has forgotten, I remind you that in Poland, even as part of a temporary arrest or a alleged replacement punishment, judges decide to close anyone in return for the unpaid fine.
Even if Kaczyński had actually returned and become Prime Minister, he would not have locked anyone up personally. Unless it's a cat in the morning before going to the Sejm. ;)
Nand the way to imagine that Kaczyński, as shortly as he took office, realized the celebrated request to repair the justice strategy of Wojtek Cejrowski (All WON!!!) and replaced the judges with faithful members of his party.
However, Tuley was severely intimidated by the imagination of a “kaczystowski” government closing incorruptible lawyers, citizens and journalists (leaded by Michnik???).
And that only means 1 thing. Theoretically, we have a "tripartition of power", but in fact it is only a rhetorical figure in the Constitution. It is hard to talk about the separation of legislative and executive powers erstwhile the parliamentary majority is ruled by the majority and the prime minister is usually the 1 who is the leader of the party.
Tuley extends it to the judges. His words mean only 1 thing.
POl's judges are mostly just servilist. If the PiS reaches for power and claws the knife, today's independent and uninvited, even presented for presidential nomination by the "right" KRS, will without blinking an eyelid will regulation arrests against their present-day allies. Only by the whim of current power.
In fact, worse than Tuley about the “tog” environment can not be said.
In this context, Igork’s next message is surprising. The evil of the Polish Temida itself is the alleged neo-judges.
Persons who have stood in unfair competitions before the false National Judicial Council, either have no legal knowledge, or do not have the quality that the justice should have, or an immaculate character. There are no schools to teach specified things....
JHow is it possible to talk of the immaculate character of a justice who was nominated for the Jaruzel junta or by the red criminal Jaruzelski who was the first president of Poland?
JHow could it be, since it is said earlier seriously that those who are pristine after being taken over by the Law and Justices will close the righteous and insubordinate only to satisfy the current power???
One of the worst lawsuits you can make on the another side is to show a deficiency of logic to her claims.
However, Tuleya shows that the absence does not concern only the parties to the proceedings.
Both the doctrine (science of law) and the judicature (judicature) emphasise the function of logic principles in the assessment of evidence by the judge.
The deficiency of simple logic demonstrated beyond uncertainty clearly indicates the deficiency of professional ability of justice Tuleyi.
The question which all Polish citizen should now ask himself, regardless of the political option or deficiency thereof, concerns the remainder of the "extraordinary caste" - What percent of judges show akin inability to think logically as Igorek mentioned above?
That includes prosecutors.
So it's bad, and it's on the brink of hopelessness.
Despite attempts to improvement the judiciary, it has been much worse since 1990 than it was even... at war. But alternatively of taking on what truly is to be changed, 1 tries to "improve" the procedure in specified a way that alternatively of clear and understandable rules, the civilian procedure is turned into a thicket of traps lurking no longer only for a individual appearing without a professional attorney, but even for a lawyer or lawyer. In specified a state of affairs, the justice focuses alternatively on catching the organization to error, while the judgement issued constitutes a “court truth” frequently far from even the celebrated highland “shit truth”.
TIt is essential to change the methodology of judgement itself. alternatively of a one-man lineup aimed at the usage of traps set on the little acquainted side of the guilt (claim) the jury should decide.
A professional justice would be only from ruling on the penalty. Then even the inability to usage logic would not be an obstacle.
And this would be a real reform, changing the image of the Polish subject practically during the quarter.
Instead, we have dictatorships told with all seriousness about the alleged failure of the regulation of law by selecting members of the KRS through the Sejm.
It should be borne in head that no of these "defensors" of the regulation of law has a bearing on the function of the chief rule of the constitutional principle, which is relegated in Article 4 of the Constitution.
The superior authority in the Republic of Poland belongs to the Nation. The nation shall exercise authority by its representatives or directly.
The selection of members of the National Court registry by representatives of the Nation (Members!) is precisely in this provision.
Until the 1997 Constitution is amended in this respect, any another explanation is incorrect.
And that would be as prof. Jan Tadeusz Stanisławski utilized to say.
3.10 2024
