In 1956, Marian Tompson and six another women founded the La Leche League in the U.S. state of Illinois. The intent of the organization was to advance breastfeeding alternatively of fashionable then bottles. Currently, 94-year-old Tompson resigned from honorary membership of the group, after being taken over by utmost left-wing activists of the “woke” ideology.
The utmost left took over a group promoting breastfeeding. The goal of the organization founded by Tompson was to supply assistance mothers in breast-feeding At a time erstwhile most children in the United States were fed a bottle and modified milk. It shortly spread to the full world. In fresh years However, the League deals with different things, but not what it was called for.
The current leadership of the organization has engaged in promoting sodomy and genderism. Its leadership includes posters showing a breastfeeding man, which fits into the neo-Elysian concept of cultural gender. Therefore, 94-year-old Marian Tompson, the last surviving founder of the organization, published a letter announcing her complete resignation with membership in the “La Leche League”. Her message states:
La Leche League is slow taken over by transsexual activists, and the global council late ordered its subsidiaries in the UK to allowed men identified as “transsexual women” to attend meetings that erstwhile were reserved exclusively for mothers.
Miriam Main, a Scottish breast-feeding supporter, besides announced that she was leaving La Leche League this week for akin reasons. Main noticed in his own resignation letterShe tried to force the leaders to perceive to her fears, but was completely ignored:
“In LLL publications and materials, I noticed that “mother” is replaced by “parent”, “feeding” by “feeding” and women are constantly referred to as “families breastfeeding”. However, these linguistic changes rapidly evolved into a complete departure from the doctrine and mission of the LLL, leading by a group of ideological fanatics. Leaders who expressed concerns about the clarity of language – for example for women for whom English is not the first language – were ridiculed and insulted.
We have been told that as an “inclusive organization” we will gotta welcome at our meetings men identified as “trans” who would like to breastfeed. The leaders then began raising legitimate concerns about safety issues. For example, the physical safety of a breast-fed kid by a man; the social and physiological safety of a parent separated from a child, so that a man can breast-feed; the intellectual safety of women in a area where a man is present; the request for privacy for women with certain spiritual beliefs.
When we raised specified concerns, we were told that we were “transphobic” and were compared to racists and Nazis” – she wrote.
LLL leaders - confirmed Main – "showing that purely theoretical male lactation is more crucial to them than the needs of real women surviving in the UK".
Neither Tompson nor Main have so far responded to media requests for closer representation of their positions, but a survey of the LLL websites shows how far the decay of sex ideology has spread in this organization.
LLL global website includes the full section dedicated to ‘transgender and non-binary parents’. There are step by step instructions on how men can produce milk. This is despite the fact that there is no medical evidence that this is at all possible and safe for the kid — but the LLL, like many another institutions taken over by the left, puts the desires of mentally sedated men above the needs of children.
“La Leche League Canada” has a section with a giant rainbow flag and the question “What is breastfeeding?” in which they explain: “Breast-feeding’ is a word utilized by any parents who identify themselves as transmese and non-binary to describe the way they feed and nurture their children.
Once again, we see that erstwhile trans activists talk about "incllusion", in practice their demands mean precisely the opposite. Including mentally sick men in the space reserved exclusively for women, women are excluded. Thus, the left-wing organization excludes first founders and activists who cannot support a new, rainbow-communist vision.
We besides recommend: Critics crush the utmost left-wing MEN task on sexual education