Bralczyk's words about a dying dog have led the discourse astray.
Zbut alternatively of arguments, emotions arose, and with them, as he teaches years of experience, winning is (almost) impossible.
Meanwhile, the problem is highly serious and, unfortunately, we are identical to the left.
He was the first to announcement him. Stanisław Lem, constantly imprinted as a science-fiction writer, which limits the scope of his thoughts rather strongly.
It's a shame, due to the fact that sooner than Noam Chomsky (nb. younger than Lem by 7 years) he made crucial observations about the nature of the language.
OK, individual will. Lem was easier. As a writer, he saw the practice of Stalinists, which gave expressions that frequently have a centuries-old tradition of meaning completely fresh content, Chomsky had to deduce it more...
In advance in Slaska cuttings Labour Tribune (1958) novels Eden We are dealing with a full spectrum of a typical sf. Starship, a distant Cosmos, an alien civilization whose representatives are double individuals – 1 is simply a host, the another is mainly a brain role.
But the elements typical of socialism are already breaking through. So with alien civilization (in this case with the Earth) the Edenians do not fight to annihilate it. They separate by a tight cordon so that no information can get to the inhabitants, let alone contact with each other; in order to escape, Earthlings must usage atomic weapons.
The ‘Iron Curtain’ presented literally.
LBut it's only didaskalia, although I'll admit that erstwhile I read the fresh for the first time, they were blocking my message.
To master the world, you gotta name it first.
This is the actual power of the word.
The dublt (a double Edenic being) meets explains Earthon's complexity in the past of the planet. Well, there were fears, there were rebellions against power...
One tyrant in a row thought that his own anonymity, with the existing regulation system, would be beneficial. Society, incapable to concentrate its resistance, to direct its enemies to a peculiar person, becomes to any degree disarmed.
If there is no authority, against whom or why would they rebel?
However, the deficiency of a concept does not consequence in the absence of nominal declarations. However, it makes them invisible.
The left has mastered the art of replacing meanings to perfection. In times of alleged post-October thaw, the "lawfulness" was rediscovered. True, in the West (and besides in partition and inter-war Poland) this concept has worked for more than 2 centuries, but...
In a general sense, the state of real socialism was its denial. After a brief hope of changing the political climate (about mid-1957 - the flagship magazine of Gomulkowska thawing After Prostu was liquidated a small later – 2 October) the socialist screw was re-screwed. In the field of the doctrine of the law, then, an crucial discovery was made – the regulation of law (with which the regulation of law is inseparably linked) is not 1 in which institutions operate on the basis and within the limits of the law, but 1 in which laws respect both offices and citizens.
And abruptly it turned out that PRL and NRF (so-called RFN) were equally illegal.
Not to mention the U.S., where they beat up blacks... ;)
Ksody, who studied during the period of the Polish People's Republic remembers perfectly classes from the basics of Marxist doctrine and concepts, frequently implanted for the remainder of his life even present organization or government vouchers.
The street mocked these attempts not so much in fear of individual repression (Poland was yet a barracks in a socialist camp with the top comparative freedoms).
What is the difference between democracy and socialist democracy? - is 1 of the more popular questions. - I'm sorry. Same as between the chair and the electrical chair – was the answer.
And the real hit was the question.
- Why is there no socialism in Switzerland?
- I'm sorry. due to the fact that it's besides tiny a country for specified a large misfortune!
Kmunists (real socialists rather) were unlucky. Well, they came to the phase of past when, in fact, all concepts were already distributed.
Thus, fresh signatures had to be added, sometimes only somewhat modifying the first concept.
I have already written about the regulation of law in the period of the Polish People's Republic. Meanwhile, we are now observing the second invasion of Martians (their planet is red) pounding like a baseball bat a fresh “lawfulness”.
This is no longer a definition sold for the full block of states. Now “lawfulness” takes on a national face. Thus, the violation of the regulation of law in Poland was the subjection of illusory judges, indeed, but the existence of at least indirect control by the Nation, which is in accordance with Article 4 Sovereign. According to the lady, what she has done in her 40s is by default the law, specified a wuss in the thought of the full European Union. And that in Germany, judges are elected by the minister? They have a different legal culture...
That's easy to explain. It's just that all government another than neo-Marxist liberals is populist, breaks the regulation of law, democracy, and proputin. ;)
It's definitely worse where it's not that obvious. It's called tolerance. Of course, against the environment of rainbow progressives. To date, it has been seen as accepting that there are people who have different values than us; what is more, these values do not deserve our recognition. However, we respect others, although we disagree with them.
This means the right to criticize specified attitudes, as it is simply a moral imperative.
But here we hear Stop! Are you criticizing? That's all you think. That's hatred speech.Which should be banned.
In fact, alternatively of TOLERANTs, neo-markers request us to AFIRMATION. It is not adequate just to accept the presence of others in society.
We're expected to be affirmative about all kinds of homosexuality. In a minute it may turn out that being consecutive should be considered... embarrassing. ;)
AThe left-wing double-thinking pegeum is the attitude toward the invaders.
Throughout the years, from the mouth of prominent leftists, we have heard complaining to the West (US especially), which uses the educated by us for the dense money of people by buying what is more capable. This is even called "brain drain".
Now for a change we hear that what is bad for us does not rise any objections to others.
Without resistance, we are to receive engineers, architects and doctors from countries where the number of educated people reaches the fractions of the promilium! And alternatively of developing, possibly even more fall doesn't affect anyone.
At least this is the image of pro-government media...
You can see lying on a kilometer, due to the fact that who actually comes sees everyone, but we live in a created world, not a real world. The fact is not what is happening, but what the media will expel.
To master the world, you gotta name it first.
However, we have a set of concepts, and they must be filled in with fresh content.
There's a fight in front of us for the signs.
22.07 2024
photo of pixabay
