Constantly in the public debate, this and that of right-wing politicians, with the hope of gaining the support of a mythical center, formulates a postulate seeking a moral compromise. In the meantime, the category of "moral matters" itself is false. The compromises mentioned here are nothing more than approval to kill children, to chemical and surgical castration of minors, and to vulgar sexual education and privileges for homosexual agreements. Moreover, the field erstwhile devoted to specified a "compromise" never recovers, due to the fact that the revolutionary left, which urges a favorable agreement for it, does not compromise itself, but does not quit in undermining the foundations of social order.
From the minute that open enemies of science, reason and fact entered the democratic scene, advocating that the authority of the state be harnessed to realise their ideology and utopia, any compromise with them becomes a step towards destruction. Under specified circumstances, healthy political communities enter open polemics and marginalize forgers of reality, clashing them with fundamental, acquainted and defined facts.
All the more reason to remind modern politicians that compromise is not possible where it concerns verifiable data and the nature of man. In these areas, the only function of policy is to spread and advance fact – all another solution will consequence in the request to multiply further regulations and instruments of coercion. 1 offense against the fact has consequences in many areas.
This is evident in the economy. erstwhile applied, an intervention that introduces a false supply or request impulse generates predictable effects that will inexorably accompany the first intended effect. A politician who ignores this – even if he provides a "zero-percent" credit for young people – will not avoid a punishment in the form of an avalanche increase in housing prices erstwhile the marketplace adjusts prices to increased demand. In order to prevent this, there will be a natural temptation to increase supply by further regulations, whether by limiting the right to rent apartments, either by launching the improvement margin control or the work to sale immediately after completion of the investment. And these movements will make successive waves of unintended effects. The deeper the marketplace intervention, the more many and more serious the government will gotta deal with. The higher the costs of regulation, supervision and failure of profitability of the sector.
To a lesser extent, this rule should be applied to violations of the laws of biology. A government that rejects the existence of 2 sexes must prepare itself for the consequences of rejecting the truth. The smallest of these will be to change the function of civilian position acts from a certain origin of information about a man into certificates of individual identity preferences. There will be further restrictions – in the name of the protection of these subjective preferences – on the freedom of speech and expression of those citizens who inactive believe in the biological fact and want to proclaim it. This in turn means intervention in the freedom of religion, at least those that grow out of realistic designation of fact and falsehood by referring these categories to the known and nonsubjective characteristics of the surrounding reality. Finally, discipline itself must then admit the precedence of relativism, which will strike the very heart of the explanation of cognition which spawned the advancement of discipline and technology.
And so from a small, it would seem, misdemeanors against biological fact we rapidly scope the planet of universities that emphasize cultural diversity and sexual workers at the expense of advancement and knowledge.
The social, economical and cultural consequences of a policy rejecting fact multiply with all law and regulation, yet threatening the state and the full culture to fall. due to the fact that at the end of each specified process comes – in the economical aspect – cost, failure and poverty; in the social aspect – conflict, polarization, oppression and distribution of the political community.
The same rules apply to life defence. Violation of the fundamental and human-wide rule that people are not killed and, in particular, children are not killed must lead to tsunami consequences. All the more so, erstwhile the government refuses to recognise the effects of the improvement of discipline and medical knowledge, including the designation of previously only presumed, due to the fact that it is hard to notice, the fullness of the humanity of the unborn man – from genetics confirming full defined individual and unique DNA, through ultrasound examination showing each physionomy, reflexes, heartbeat, and pain, to medicine, which allows the endurance of an ever-born man or treatment, including the surgery of an unborn patient.
Denying the humanity of an unborn kid has become as a consequence of the advancement of anti-scientific discipline a claim equal to the economical views of communists or irrational claims of genderists.
The failure of the full human rights strategy is simply a consequence of the abolition of equal human rights before and after birth. This is what the Constitutional Court wrote about erstwhile in 1997 it pointed out that the regulation of law was unacceptable for the legislator to decide on the border on the protection of human life in isolation from the boundaries set by biology – conception and death.
Contrary to the belief of the post-politics era, policy is not to obliterate compromises and search a "golden measure". specified a political function is simply a margin for its tasks, concerning fewer major issues and a number of insignificant matters, the regulation of which is within the limits of the previously recognized fact and nature of man. In this light, the request to search "moral compromises" is, first, to escape responsibility, but above all, to remove the burden of power from each other, which is not to search easy solutions but beneficial for the common good and the full political community.
Mec. Jerzy Kwasniewski
The text was published in the 102nd issue of the bimonthly "Polonia Christiana" (January-February 2025).
Order a letter: +48 12 423 44 23
Click HERE and check the archive numbers
