Stanislaw Michalkiewicz: We are happy today!
Although it is far from Easter, from the Warsaw Judenrat at Czerska Street, where the editorial office of “Gazeta Wyborcza” directed by the well-deserved Cady of Michnik Adam, there are already sounds of the song “Wejoy us today” which is followed by the citizen Terlikowski Tomasz, a professional Catholic, cast by the Judenrat on various sections of the ideological front – depending on the current need. “Is the instrument unruly or is the musician wrong?” – asked Adam Mickiewicz in “Pan Tadeusz”, describing Jankiel's concert.
But “the master is not wrong” – although the large Night is inactive far away, there is an crucial reason for singing this old cant. It is, of course, the decision of Pope Leon XIV to replace him as the Metropolitan of Krakow. So far, to the annoyance of Judenrat and its various Kraków branches, among others – this “holy Wiślna Street” – this office was held by His Excellency Archbishop Marek Jędraszewski. As the police study says, “he enjoyed a bad reputation” in the progressive environments that accused him of “breaking up” that “dividing” that “worst” and, above all, that he engaged politically.
The mischief flowed from here, due to the fact that Stefan Kisielewski already claimed that nothing was as bad as the truth. However, JE Archbishop Jędraszewski gave various diagnoses on the situation both in the Church and in our unfortunate country, pointing to the causes of this situation. This is why he was criticized for “political commitment”. The point is that to engage politically is yes – you can and even request – but on the right side, that is – on this side, which Judenrat and his Kraków branch support.
However, JE Archbishop Jędraszewski seemed to have accepted the Judenrat directives at all. So it ended with how it had to end; the reports and fervent prayers of the progressives, as well as the firing acts directed by them, yet changed their access to His Holiness Leon XIV, who made a suitable substitute for the position of the Metropolitan of Krakow, sending there His Eminence Gregory Cardinal Rysia, who has previously managed the Archdiocese of Łódź.
His Eminence already stated in the first soldier's words that the Church did not want in Krakow. So – he does not want for a Church that would not be “missionary”, further – he does not want for a Church that was not “open” and – that he does not want for a Church that would not be “merciful.” We must take these words apart, due to the fact that Krakow will most likely not end, as the Judenrat covers our full unfortunate country, instructing advancement in all region.
Independently from Judenrat, fresh currents will besides be distributed among the people by the oars, including the tremendous pater Gużyński, who besides expressed his large joy due to the Kraków submandina.
What does it mean, then, that in Krakow under His Eminence we will gotta deal with the “missionary” Church? This imagination must be considered in the context of a draft resolution of the Council of Ministers, prepared by vaginess Maria Ejchart from the vaginite of a citizen of Tusk Donald, whose protagonist is the fight against “anti-Semitism” and “supporting judaic life” in our bantustan until 2030.
While the vaginet of a citizen of Tusk Donald will fight antisemitismus in the legal and political section, His Eminence will supplement this fight in the theological section – that antsemitismus is besides a mortal sin, which is not known to be forgiven – both in this planet and in that one. And erstwhile our little valuable indigenous nation is made by both “the throne” and “the altar” taken by face, the Jews will proceed to the realization of property claims relating to uninherited property, which is referred to in U.S. Act 447.
As we can see, it is not only a “mission” but in addition – a delicate mission requiring a skillful combination not only of Heaven and Earth, not only of “Tron” and “Altar” but besides of the fresh York Anti-Defamation League, which, as we know, has the last word in terms of what is anti-Semitism and what is not. Anti-Semitism, it is besides serious for the Jews to leave it to stupid goys—let them even be titled—like His Eminence.
The second is the Church “open”. What can that mean? And what else could it be, specified as a ban on excluding anyone from the Church – and if anyone, Satan too? How long can we tolerate a situation where Satan, proceeding various exorcisms, or declarations of renunciation not only of him, but of all his affairs, must endure unspeakable catius?
It is clear that this exclusion, this shameful stigmatisation, must be put to an end as shortly as possible, all the more so that this process is already rather advanced – as JŚ noted. Paul VI – that “the odor of Satan” through any “seal” but went through to “the temple of the Lord.” The “open” church means that no 1 will gotta compression through any “stitch” anymore, but it will enter itself through a wide open large door.
Finally, the Church of Mercy. Here the situation is clear; it is not only about beginning the door, as in Satan's case – it is besides about taking in both “woman” with “disturbed” – as Marshal Piłsudski utilized to say – gender, but besides – sodomites, gomorites and trans people. Not only will you “take in” but besides – to give them a appropriate place in the Church where they could caregiver their “dude” without fear that any fanatics, any fundamentalists, would point them out with an inexorable finger.
I think, therefore, that the fresh “New Testament” to date will should be replaced by the “Newest Testament”, which I believe is already under way as part of “synodality”. I am certain that this fresh Testament will be cleansed of the various anarchronisms which have become entangled by any deficiency of sight.
In connection with the mentioned sub-name in the position of the Krakow Metropolitan, there were besides false rumours that the auxiliary bishop of the Krakow Metropolitan was to be the Grand Honourable Anna Maria Żukowska. Si non e vero e ben trovato for 3 reasons – and it is known that omne trinum perfectum. First – The large Venerable has first-class roots, so it would be a visible sign that there could be no lewd antisemitismus of speech.
Secondly – she has a female in her papers – so on this occasion the fundamental issue of women in the Church would be dealt with – what is essential to begin with, and if so, why not make the Grand Honourable Anna Maria Żukowska the auxiliary bishop of Kraków? I'm certain His Eminence wouldn't mind. Thirdly, the large Venerable maintains that she could with anyone, that is, “with all brisk.” What more do you want?
We besides recommend: Is Britain going to impose a taxation on knife users? It's meant to discourage terrorists.